Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Partner Perspectives  Connecting marketers to our tech communities.
8/26/2015
09:15 AM
Torry Campbell
Torry Campbell
Partner Perspectives
50%
50%

From Vicious To Virtuous: A Plan Of Attack For Incident Response

How do you get there? Increase the cost and effort required by the bad guys and boost your efficiency.

Post-audit, post-breach, post-I-just-started-a-new-job, you know you should boost your incident-response efforts and may wonder where to invest. In a new SANS survey on incident response, co-sponsored by Intel Security, the top impediments to IR success were predictable, with shortage of skills and budget for tools and technology leading the list (see chart below). 

Overall, there’s a correlation between many of the top 10 impediments. For example, a company’s visibility across events and domains and its ability to discern malicious from benign events would both be improved if it had the right tools and technology. This is a vicious circle.

How do you get off this hamster wheel? Through two strategies:

  • Increase the cost and effort required by the bad guys
  • Increase your efficiency

Harder For Them

First, make the bad guys lives’ difficult. For example, in a survey at Black Hat 2015, we asked where people were struggling most today across the attack chain (see chart below). 

Mitigation of the number one challenge -- exploitation -- requires reducing the attack surface, not just structurally as you might with controls such as application whitelisting, but in an ongoing way with active vulnerability management.

Incident responders can provide the most valuable insights as to the nature and tactics of attacks and where your specific organizations may be vulnerable. Capturing and sharing that feedback quickly so administrators can refine policies and improve countermeasures can be tremendously helpful in staying on the pre-breachside of the attack timeline. And this effort is selfishly beneficial for incident responders: By raising the bar on protection, fewer security events enter their queue.  

Threat-intelligence sharing is another way that you can make the cybercriminal business less profitable. Attackers have to keep moving on, keep evolving, keep investing. For instance, as you discover new malware in your sandbox, use STIX to share its details. In addition, consume select STIX feeds, hunt for those indicators within your infrastructure, and match your internal detections to industry findings to prioritize events (and the utility of external data). These efforts help address the command-and-control and delivery challenges that Black Hat attendees highlighted.

Easier For You

In addition, drive to increase your efficiency. As the SANS survey shows, there are many different opportunities for improvement in both detection and response such as better detection of stealthy maneuvering through expanded visibility and advanced analytics. This survey shows that correlation and anomaly detection are being adopted and having an impact. It aligns with other survey findings about the value of timely data.

Customers tell us they see ROI when they centralize event and threat data, processes, and policy management. They can distill and prioritize events that are most relevant to their organizations (detect the real malicious events), then contain and remediate compromised systems using centralized tools and workflows. These are the challenges the SANS survey respondents highlighted. Together, these strategies shrink dwell time, reduce the costs of attacks, and enhance that virtuous cycle. 

Torry Campbell is the Chief Technology Officer for Endpoint and Management technologies for Intel Security, formerly McAfee. From a decade at McAfee, he couples his security operations background with product management, development, and customer implementation experience to ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
10 Ways to Keep a Rogue RasPi From Wrecking Your Network
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  7/10/2019
The Security of Cloud Applications
Hillel Solow, CTO and Co-founder, Protego,  7/11/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-0234
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-15
A Reflected Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Apache Roller. Roller's Math Comment Authenticator did not property sanitize user input and could be exploited to perform Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS). The mitigation for this vulnerability is to upgrade to the latest version of ...
CVE-2018-7838
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-15
A CWE-119 Buffer Errors vulnerability exists in Modicon M580 CPU - BMEP582040, all versions before V2.90, and Modicon Ethernet Module BMENOC0301, all versions before V2.16, which could cause denial of service on the FTP service of the controller or the Ethernet BMENOC module when it receives a FTP C...
CVE-2019-6822
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-15
A Use After Free: CWE-416 vulnerability exists in Zelio Soft 2, V5.2 and earlier, which could cause remote code execution when opening a specially crafted Zelio Soft 2 project file.
CVE-2019-6823
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-15
A CWE-94: Code Injection vulnerability exists in ProClima (all versions prior to version 8.0.0) which could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the targeted system in all versions of ProClima prior to version 8.0.0.
CVE-2019-6824
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-15
A CWE-119: Buffer Errors vulnerability exists in ProClima (all versions prior to version 8.0.0) which allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the targeted system in all versions of ProClima prior to version 8.0.0.