Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Partner Perspectives  Connecting marketers to our tech communities.
11/8/2016
02:47 PM
Ned Miller
Ned Miller
Partner Perspectives
50%
50%

Every Minute Of Security Planning Will Save You 10 Minutes In Execution

Leveraging automation, orchestration, and interoperability in your cybersecurity plans now will save you significant time later.

Time management guru Brian Tracy is often quoted as saying, “Every minute of planning you do now will save you 10 minutes in execution; this gives you a 1,000% return on energy.”

In cybersecurity, where we are faced with a volume of threats and events that exceeds the capacity of available resources, achieving this level of return on time and energy is essential. Whether you need to update existing plans or build new ones, investing in cyber defensive strategies, incident response plans, security personnel, and operational processes has to be part of your organization’s continuous improvement practice.

When building and updating plans, look to industry best practices. In cybersecurity, this means promoting the use of as much interoperability, automation, and orchestration as possible within an organization’s security operations. However, you will not necessarily get optimal results and maximum velocity by simply adding these capabilities on top of existing architectures, policies, and processes.

Architecture Enables Velocity

Increasing velocity requires an architecture that can actually be sped up. Most organizations rely on a multivendor, siloed security infrastructure, where products do not communicate with each other. These types of security architectures lack sufficient interoperability of the inspection, intelligence gathering, analytics, and enforcement components to gain much from automation.

Interoperability enables automation and improves effectiveness. The active sharing of data makes it practical and possible for every security control to leverage each other’s strengths and experiences. Rather than treating each malware interaction as a standalone event, adaptive threat prevention integrates processes and data through an efficient messaging layer. This approach reinforces levels of inspection and analysis and connects end-to-end components to generate and consume as much actionable intelligence as possible from each event.

Processes And Policies Are Lubricants

An adaptive and interoperable security architecture helps overcome the all too common functional fences that impede detection, response, and any chance of improved prevention. However, this is only possible when the organization’s processes and policies complement the architecture. Unintegrated security functions keep organizations in firefighting mode, always reacting and pouring human resources into every breach. Process inefficiency exhausts scarce investigative resources and lengthens the timeline during which data and networks are exposed to determined attackers, which is directly correlated with the extent of damage.

Automation And Orchestration Are Accelerants

Enabled by an interoperable architecture and efficient processes, automation and orchestration become a force multiplier, augmenting human capabilities, increasing processing capacity, reducing workloads, and significantly improving incident response times. Security products, integrated with a real-time, bidirectional messaging layer, can directly share event data, context, and threat intelligence, regardless of location and with little or no human interaction. This means that you can communicate security policies and commands from centralized security controls to remote branches, home offices, mobile devices, cloud services, and IoT devices.

It is simply no longer acceptable for the time-to-detection to reaction to containment to take hours or even minutes. To accelerate this process and keep up with the enormous volume of sophisticated threats, security architectures and processes must evolve and be automated.

Intel Security’s Data Exchange Layer (DXL) is an open and easily integrated messaging fabric that enables security components from a large ecosystem of vendors to share relevant data. By providing near real-time command and control options for otherwise inaccessible systems, it benefits organizations by facilitating automated response, vastly reduced response times, and better containment. The goal of DXL is to promote collaborative security, enable active command and control, forge interoperability (plug-and-play) among distributed elements from disparate vendors, and ensure consistency and speed of outcomes.

In closing, get started planning today so that you can benefit from the savings on execution time tomorrow. Remember to apply your security reference architecture planning across all phases of your protection domains, including your IoT ecosystems. One last quote from Brian Tracy: “Imagine no limitations; decide what's right and desirable before you decide what's possible.”

Ned Miller, a 30+ year technology industry veteran, is the Chief Technology Strategist for the Intel Security Public Sector division. Mr. Miller is responsible for working with industry and government thought leaders and worldwide public sector customers to ensure that ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/6/2020
Ripple20 Threatens Increasingly Connected Medical Devices
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/30/2020
DDoS Attacks Jump 542% from Q4 2019 to Q1 2020
Dark Reading Staff 6/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15570
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-06
The parse_report() function in whoopsie.c in Whoopsie through 0.2.69 mishandles memory allocation failures, which allows an attacker to cause a denial of service via a malformed crash file.
CVE-2020-15569
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-06
PlayerGeneric.cpp in MilkyTracker through 1.02.00 has a use-after-free in the PlayerGeneric destructor.
CVE-2020-7690
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-06
It's possible to inject JavaScript code via the html method.
CVE-2020-7691
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-06
It's possible to use <<script>script> in order to go over the filtering regex.
CVE-2020-15562
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-06
An issue was discovered in Roundcube Webmail before 1.2.11, 1.3.x before 1.3.14, and 1.4.x before 1.4.7. It allows XSS via a crafted HTML e-mail message, as demonstrated by a JavaScript payload in the xmlns (aka XML namespace) attribute of a HEAD element when an SVG element exists.