Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Partner Perspectives  Connecting marketers to our tech communities.
SPONSORED BY
1/26/2018
09:00 AM
Paul Martini
Paul Martini
Partner Perspectives
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
50%
50%

Selling Cloud-Based Cybersecurity to a Skeptic

When it comes to security, organizations don't need to look at cloud as an either/or proposition. But there are misconceptions that need to be addressed.

Nearly five years ago, a study conducted by the MIT Sloan Management Review found that the vast majority of business managers surveyed believed that "achieving digital transformation" – the process of virtualizing operations and migrating toward the cloud – was critical to their organizations. Yet the same report showed that 63% of respondents believed their organization was too slow to embrace technological change, primarily due to a lack of communication about the strategic benefits of cloud adoption.

While in recent years the adoption of cloud-based communication and productivity tools has picked up among businesses -- hybrid cloud adoption increased from 19% to 57% of organizations surveyed in a recent McAfee cloud trends report -- many companies are stillskeptical about embracing cloud-based cybersecurity solutions, even as the benefits of cloud services are becoming more widely acknowledged. Still, misconceptions remain. Here are three key objections, and how to dispel them. 

Objection One: My Data Will Be Safer On-Premises.
When the servers that manage company data move from an on-premises data center into a cloud environment, security teams often feel a loss of control due to their lack of physical proximity to sensitive corporate data. Consequently, before blindly trusting a cloud provider, companies need to vet a potential cloud’s security posture by asking probing questions, for example:

  • What compliance certifications has the cloud earned?
  • Can cloud provider meet industry compliance regulations?
  • What is the disaster recovery plan at the data center?
  • How is individual customer data isolated?
  • What encryption policies does the cloud employ?

Every data center and cloud provider should have clear answers to these questions before they are even considered. Even then, security teams should be mindful of the specific requirements of their own organizations and make sure the cloud services they need are available to them.

Objection Two: Do I Have To Go All In On Cloud?
Organizations don’t need to look at cloud in an either/or context. The next generation of cloud security platforms decouple the physical from the cloud, enabling organizations to meet regulatory compliance for data isolation while leveraging the cloud for remote sites and mobile users without increasing resource overhead.

In this context, organizations can leverage as much or as little cloud as they’d like. If they need certain traffic and data isolated to headquarters, organizations can direct that information through local appliances rather than redirect them to cloud-based solutions. Mixing-and-matching cloud-delivered and appliance-based security tools is also a boon for remote workers, as traffic that doesn’t need to necessarily be backhauled to an appliance at headquarters will experience less latency when processed directly through the cloud. Flexibility is at the core of these tools by not restricting customers to solutions that might be an ill fit.

Objection Three: Migration Will Be Too Disruptive
The truth is, the foundational infrastructure of the cloud is quite mature, having been developed and improved upon since the dawn of the Internet. We simply now call it the cloud, and the benefits of adoption have taken a while to funnel up to critical business decision makers. Teams need to simply do their research and find the least disruptive cloud security solution for their business – one that can scale to their needs appropriately and can be implemented seamlessly rather than upend an entire network infrastructure. 

Paul Martini is the CEO, co-founder and chief architect of iboss, where he pioneered the award-winning iboss Distributed Gateway Platform, a web gateway as a service. Paul has been recognized for his leadership and innovation, receiving the Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of The ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
7 Truths About BEC Scams
Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer,  6/13/2019
DNS Firewalls Could Prevent Billions in Losses to Cybercrime
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  6/13/2019
Can Your Patching Strategy Keep Up with the Demands of Open Source?
Tim Mackey, Principal Security Strategist, CyRC, at Synopsys,  6/18/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-1874
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-20
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Prime Service Catalog Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protection mechanisms on the web-ba...
CVE-2019-1875
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-20
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Prime Service Catalog could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the web-based interface. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input by t...
CVE-2019-1876
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-20
A vulnerability in the HTTPS proxy feature of Cisco Wide Area Application Services (WAAS) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to use the Central Manager as an HTTPS proxy. The vulnerability is due to insufficient authentication of proxy connection requests. An attacker could exp...
CVE-2019-1878
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-20
A vulnerability in the Cisco Discovery Protocol (CDP) implementation for the Cisco TelePresence Codec (TC) and Collaboration Endpoint (CE) Software could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to inject arbitrary shell commands that are executed by the device. The vulnerability is due to insuff...
CVE-2019-1879
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-20
A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco Integrated Management Controller (IMC) could allow an authenticated, local attacker to inject arbitrary commands that are executed with root privileges. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input at the CLI. An attacker could exploi...