Partner Perspectives  Connecting marketers to our tech communities.
SPONSORED BY
10/19/2017
09:00 AM
Mike Convertino
Mike Convertino
Partner Perspectives
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
RSS
100%
0%

CISOs: Striving Toward Proactive Security Strategies

A new survey paints a compelling picture of the modern security executive, how they succeed, and how much power they wield.

Chief Information Security Officers are in a tough spot. Organizations are squeezed by cyber criminals, new compliance requirements, and bleeding-edge technologies that erode privacy and stability. The team that leads defense efforts is becoming a more and more vital player in the long-term survival of any organization that sells, uses, or produces information technology — that is to say, everyone. But what do we really know about CISOs and how they operate?

Many surveys talk about CISO salaries and job prospects, but we felt that the industry as a whole needed to fully understand what goes into the day-to-day job of a CISO. F5 and research firm Ponemon teamed to directly survey CISOs. Our goal: to draw as complete a picture as we could on the modern security executive. In the report, "The Evolving Role of CISOS and Their Importance to the Business," we focus on key areas like budgetary control, organizational influence, decision rationale, and strategic methodology. In other words, how do CISOs succeed, and how much power do they wield? We also delve into the background of CISOs and their experience, both in terms of technical capability and business savvy.

To cast a wide net, we interviewed senior level IT security professionals from 184 organizations in seven countries, tracking nearly 70 questions. We wanted a deep, unbiased look at the contemporary CISO. The results are eye-opening, and both encouraging and worrisome.

First, the discouraging news: security programs appear to be reactive: 60% of respondents say material data breaches and cybersecurity exploits are the primary drivers of change in security programs. A mere 22% of respondents say their organizations’ security function is integrated with other business functions. Perhaps most concerning, only 51% say their organization has an IT security strategy and, of those, only 43% say that the company strategy is reviewed, approved, and supported by C-level executives.

Now the is good news. A full 77% of respondents say their IT security operations are aligned with IT operations, although fewer respondents (60%) say they have achieved alignment of IT security operations with business objectives.

Furthermore, there are some promising trends in the day-to-day responsibilities CISOs hold. Most CISOs (67%) believe they should be responsible for setting security strategy, and the majority are influential in managing their companies’ cybersecurity risks, with 65% reporting to senior executives (meaning, no more than three steps below the CEO on the organization chart). Over half (61%) set the security mission and are responsible for informing the organization about new threats, technologies, practices, and compliance requirements (60%). In the event of a serious security incident, more than half (60%) have a direct channel to the CEO.

These findings indicate both the challenges and the progress CISOs are making in today’s complex environment. I invite you to reflect on and discuss these findings with your peers and in the comment section below. My hope is that we now have a foundation for more meaningful conversations with one another, and have a greater impact on our organizations. I also hope the broader discussions we are driving here at F5 Labs are providing CISOs and future CISOs the tools to tackle this challenge.

There's a lot there. You can read the full report here

Get the latest application threat intelligence from F5 Labs.

Mike Convertino has nearly 30 years of experience in providing enterprise-level information security, cloud-grade information systems solutions, and advanced cyber capability development. His professional experience spans security leadership and product development at a wide ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
'Shift Left' & the Connected Car
Rohit Sethi, COO of Security Compass,  6/12/2018
Microsoft Fixes 11 Critical, 39 Important Vulns
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/12/2018
Why CISOs Need a Security Reality Check
Joel Fulton, Chief Information Security Officer for Splunk,  6/13/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Partner Perspectives
What's This?
F5 makes apps go-faster, smarter, and safer. With solutions for the cloud and the data center, F5 technology provides unparalleled visibility and control, allowing customers to secure their users, applications, and data. For more information, visit www.f5.com.
Featured Writers
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-12578
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-19
There is a heap-based buffer overflow in bmp_compress1_row in appliers.cpp in sam2p 0.49.4 that leads to a denial of service or possibly unspecified other impact.
CVE-2018-1061
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-19
python before versions 2.7.15, 3.4.9, 3.5.6 and 3.7.0 is vulnerable to catastrophic backtracking in the difflib.IS_LINE_JUNK method. An attacker could use this flaw to cause denial of service.
CVE-2018-1073
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-19
The web console login form in ovirt-engine before version 4.2.3 returned different errors for non-existent users and invalid passwords, allowing an attacker to discover the names of valid user accounts.
CVE-2018-12557
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-19
An issue was discovered in Zuul 3.x before 3.1.0. If nodes become offline during the build, the no_log attribute of a task is ignored. If the unreachable error occurred in a task used with a loop variable (e.g., with_items), the contents of the loop items would be printed in the console. This could ...
CVE-2018-12559
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-19
An issue was discovered in the cantata-mounter D-Bus service in Cantata through 2.3.1. The mount target path check in mounter.cpp `mpOk()` is insufficient. A regular user can consequently mount a CIFS filesystem anywhere (e.g., outside of the /home directory tree) by passing directory traversal sequ...