Partner Perspectives  Connecting marketers to our tech communities.
SPONSORED BY
10/19/2017
09:00 AM
Mike Convertino
Mike Convertino
Partner Perspectives
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
RSS
100%
0%

CISOs: Striving Toward Proactive Security Strategies

A new survey paints a compelling picture of the modern security executive, how they succeed, and how much power they wield.

Chief Information Security Officers are in a tough spot. Organizations are squeezed by cyber criminals, new compliance requirements, and bleeding-edge technologies that erode privacy and stability. The team that leads defense efforts is becoming a more and more vital player in the long-term survival of any organization that sells, uses, or produces information technology — that is to say, everyone. But what do we really know about CISOs and how they operate?

Many surveys talk about CISO salaries and job prospects, but we felt that the industry as a whole needed to fully understand what goes into the day-to-day job of a CISO. F5 and research firm Ponemon teamed to directly survey CISOs. Our goal: to draw as complete a picture as we could on the modern security executive. In the report, "The Evolving Role of CISOS and Their Importance to the Business," we focus on key areas like budgetary control, organizational influence, decision rationale, and strategic methodology. In other words, how do CISOs succeed, and how much power do they wield? We also delve into the background of CISOs and their experience, both in terms of technical capability and business savvy.

To cast a wide net, we interviewed senior level IT security professionals from 184 organizations in seven countries, tracking nearly 70 questions. We wanted a deep, unbiased look at the contemporary CISO. The results are eye-opening, and both encouraging and worrisome.

First, the discouraging news: security programs appear to be reactive: 60% of respondents say material data breaches and cybersecurity exploits are the primary drivers of change in security programs. A mere 22% of respondents say their organizations’ security function is integrated with other business functions. Perhaps most concerning, only 51% say their organization has an IT security strategy and, of those, only 43% say that the company strategy is reviewed, approved, and supported by C-level executives.

Now the is good news. A full 77% of respondents say their IT security operations are aligned with IT operations, although fewer respondents (60%) say they have achieved alignment of IT security operations with business objectives.

Furthermore, there are some promising trends in the day-to-day responsibilities CISOs hold. Most CISOs (67%) believe they should be responsible for setting security strategy, and the majority are influential in managing their companies’ cybersecurity risks, with 65% reporting to senior executives (meaning, no more than three steps below the CEO on the organization chart). Over half (61%) set the security mission and are responsible for informing the organization about new threats, technologies, practices, and compliance requirements (60%). In the event of a serious security incident, more than half (60%) have a direct channel to the CEO.

These findings indicate both the challenges and the progress CISOs are making in today’s complex environment. I invite you to reflect on and discuss these findings with your peers and in the comment section below. My hope is that we now have a foundation for more meaningful conversations with one another, and have a greater impact on our organizations. I also hope the broader discussions we are driving here at F5 Labs are providing CISOs and future CISOs the tools to tackle this challenge.

There's a lot there. You can read the full report here

Get the latest application threat intelligence from F5 Labs.

Mike Convertino has nearly 30 years of experience in providing enterprise-level information security, cloud-grade information systems solutions, and advanced cyber capability development. His professional experience spans security leadership and product development at a wide ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
It Takes an Average of 3 to 6 Months to Fill a Cybersecurity Job
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  3/12/2019
763M Email Addresses Exposed in Latest Database Misconfiguration Episode
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  3/11/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: LOL  Hope this one wins
Current Issue
5 Emerging Cyber Threats to Watch for in 2019
Online attackers are constantly developing new, innovative ways to break into the enterprise. This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at five emerging attack trends and exploits your security team should look out for, along with helpful recommendations on how you can prevent your organization from falling victim.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-6149
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-18
An unquoted search path vulnerability was identified in Lenovo Dynamic Power Reduction Utility prior to version 2.2.2.0 that could allow a malicious user with local access to execute code with administrative privileges.
CVE-2018-15509
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-18
Five9 Agent Desktop Plus 10.0.70 has Incorrect Access Control (issue 2 of 2).
CVE-2018-20806
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-17
Phamm (aka PHP LDAP Virtual Hosting Manager) 0.6.8 allows XSS via the login page (the /public/main.php action parameter).
CVE-2019-5616
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-15
CircuitWerkes Sicon-8, a hardware device used for managing electrical devices, ships with a web-based front-end controller and implements an authentication mechanism in JavaScript that is run in the context of a user's web browser.
CVE-2018-17882
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-15
An Integer overflow vulnerability exists in the batchTransfer function of a smart contract implementation for CryptoBotsBattle (CBTB), an Ethereum token. This vulnerability could be used by an attacker to create an arbitrary amount of tokens for any user.