Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Partner Perspectives //

bitdefender

1/17/2017
12:00 PM
Liviu Arsene
Liviu Arsene
Partner Perspectives
Connect Directly
Twitter
Google+
LinkedIn
RSS
100%
0%

Machine Learning For Cybersecurity Not Cybercrime

Cybercriminals have yet to adopt machine learning for offensive attack strategies - and they probably won't for a long time.

The cybersecurity industry has always been under constant strain from cybercriminals and malware. With increasing integration of hardware, software and services being built into every aspect of our lives, the task of keeping data secure has become even more difficult.

The arsenal of tools that cybercriminals now have at their disposal has raised concerns for security companies, and turned the criminals into threat actors who can create, disseminate and penetrate a target’s defenses using custom-built and never-before-seen malware. The security industry has had to adopt a new way of dealing with the unknown by leveraging the powerful capabilities of machine learning algorithms.

Cybersecurity & Machine Learning
Because targeted and advanced threats that seek to prey on organizations and businesses often evade traditional security mechanisms, machine learning algorithms have stepped in to fill in the gap between proactivity and detection. While humans are great at in-depth analysis and pinpointing code subtleties in malicious samples, machine learning is better at applying models on large data without tiring or complaining of repetitive tasks.

In the context of big data – where everything connected to the Internet from IoT devices to physical and virtual endpoints is a potential source of information or point of attack - machine learning can be trained to parse, analyze and interpret that data with little no effort.

The human component, however, is responsible for the accuracy of the machine learning model and for supplying its “wits.” Cybersecurity specialists with years of experience in reverse engineering malware samples and analyzing attack techniques are the ones who usually transfer their experience to machine learning algorithms, training the algorithms for behavior analytics and anomaly detection. While machine learning algorithms range from neural networks to genetic algorithms, their ultimate goal is to adapt to variations of a baseline behavior.

Do Cybercriminals Use Machine Learning?
No, they don’t! That’s because they already have a wide range of tools and mechanisms that have automated not only malware development but also ensured that each new malware sample is unique.

Obfuscation and polymorphism are just two examples cybercriminals use to create and deliver ransomware samples to both average users and organizations. They are so effective that ransomware is estimated to have inflicted at least $1 billion in financial losses in 2016 alone.

Encryption is another powerful tool consistently leveraged by cybercriminals to mask data exfiltration and even extort victims. The whole point of the cybercrime industry is to constantly create new packing mechanisms for malware samples, and not necessarily come up with innovative attack techniques or behavior. This doesn’t require machine learning; it involves constant algorithm tweaking or the development of obfuscation functions or encryption algorithms.

Is Machine Learning Offensive or Defensive?
When applied in the “cyber” context, current machine learning capabilities are mostly defensive. Machine learning helps the security industry tackle more than 500 million malware samples. Cybercriminals have yet to adopt machine learning and they probably won’t for a long time.

While there have been examples of machine learning algorithms being pitted against each other; one looking for software vulnerabilities and the other trying to patch them – these exercises were for demonstration only.

Of course, machine learning can be considered to have offensive capabilities when applied in the gaming industry, as it can be trained to take out virtual foes with the same accuracy as their human counterparts. However, they’re yet to be used for cybercriminal activities. 

Liviu Arsene is a senior e-threat analyst for Bitdefender, with a strong background in security and technology. Reporting on global trends and developments in computer security, he writes about malware outbreaks and security incidents while coordinating with technical and ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Moises Danziger
50%
50%
Moises Danziger,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/24/2017 | 5:27:15 PM
I wouldn't be so sure
During my researchs in the application of Machine Learning (ML) on security I've been surprising with some proposals showing ways to apply ML to cybercrime. For example, for malware obfuscation, to improve the C&C channel from botnets, to add intelligence for worms...etc. These are simple examples. After that, I've been studying the impact of ML when in bad hands. I can tell you hackers will use ML to improve their attack tools soon (although they may already be applying). Our challenge is discovering how it could be dangerous for current security tools.
Florida Town Pays $600K to Ransomware Operators
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  6/20/2019
Pledges to Not Pay Ransomware Hit Reality
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  6/21/2019
AWS CISO Talks Risk Reduction, Development, Recruitment
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/25/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-1619
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-27
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication and execute arbitrary actions with administrative privileges on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper session ...
CVE-2019-1620
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-27
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to upload arbitrary files on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to incorrect permission settings in affected DCNM software. An attacker could ex...
CVE-2019-1621
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-27
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain access to sensitive files on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to incorrect permissions settings on affected DCNM software. An attacker...
CVE-2019-1622
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-27
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to retrieve sensitive information from an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper access controls for certain URLs on affected DCNM software...
CVE-2019-10133
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-26
A flaw was found in Moodle before 3.7, 3.6.4, 3.5.6, 3.4.9 and 3.1.18. The form to upload cohorts contained a redirect field, which was not restricted to internal URLs.