Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operations

5/27/2016
12:40 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

SWIFT Proposes New Measures For Bolstering Its Security

Measures come amid news that up to 12 banks may have fallen victim to attacks attempting to steal millions via the SWIFT network.

Beleaguered global financial messaging services provider SWIFT today outlined a five-part plan to help its banking customers respond to the growing cybersecurity concerns caused by recent multi-million dollar heists at multiple banks in Asia.

The plan includes measures for increased information-sharing between banks, tougher security requirements for bank software that interface locally with SWIFT’s network, new audit and certification standards, and the use of tools to detect fraudulent transactions over SWIFT.

In a statement, SWIFT, which is short for the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication, continued to insist that its own systems and security have not been directly implicated in the attacks. It cast the proposals instead as measures designed to help the global banking community better secure their locally managed infrastructure against compromise and misuse.

The measures come amid reports that at least 12 banks may have fallen victim to attacks in which threat actors used stolen login credentials to transfer, or attempt to transfer, money from victim banks to their own accounts, over the SWIFT network. News of the thefts, beginning with the stunning $81 million heist at the Bangladesh Bank in February, have shaken confidence in the integrity of the global financial messaging system and the controls that banks use to access and transfer funds over it.

Meanwhile, in a separate but related development, Symantec became the second security vendor after BAE Systems to confirm a connection between the bank thefts and the massive Nov. 2014 attacks on Sony Pictures.

In a blog post this week, Symantec said it has found evidence that links malware used in recent attacks against Bangladesh Bank and two other banks in the Philippines and Vietnam, with a cybercrime group known as Lazarus. The Lazarus group has been linked to a highly destructive Trojan that was used in the Sony attack, Symantec said.

The FBI and the US government have formally accused the North Korean government of complicity in the Sony attacks. The new evidence has raised some media speculation of a potential North Korean link in the bank attacks. But it is always possible that while the tools are the same, the groups behind the Sony attack and the attacks on the banks are entirely different.

SWIFT said its five-point proposal sets a clear operational and security baseline that banks would need to meet when conducting SWIFT transactions. The information-sharing component, for instance, would require banks to provide more information about any security incidents they experience involving SWIFT infrastructure so it can be shared with the broader community.

Similarly, SWIFT said it would require stronger security controls for software that banks use to connect to the SWIFT network, but did not elaborate on what those requirements would be.

2FA

SWIFT in turn will also take steps to harden its own products, the statement noted. For example, in addition to two-factor authentication, SWIFT would require additional controls for banks accessing its network, but it did not specify what those controls should be. SWIFT will also increase remote monitoring of customer environments to supplement the measures, which banks have in place to protect access to its networks,

In addition, SWIFT will explore the use of tools that would help detect anomalous transactions on its network as well as tools that would help banks quickly recall fraudulent transfers and to put "stop payments" on them in a timely fashion.

“The Bangladesh fraud is not an isolated incident,” SWIFT CEO Gottfried Leibbrandt had warned in prepared remarks at a financial conference in Brussels recently. “We are aware of at least two, but possibly more, other cases where fraudsters used the same modus operandi, albeit without the spectacular amounts.”

The recent attacks are a “big deal” and pose a problem on two fronts, Leibbrandt said. “First it’s a problem because banks that are compromised like this can be put out of business,” he said. “Second, it’s a problem because the financial system is hugely interconnected and it operates on trust.”

Related stories

 

 

 

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Natasha_D_G
50%
50%
Natasha_D_G,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/31/2016 | 2:42:06 PM
Sock draw safer than banks?
It's disturbing that we had to wait for 12 banks to be breached to make changes. As well as it's scary how easy it is to breach our banking systems. With technology we've opened a whole new world of opportunities for citizens but also for cyber criminals. The only way we can counter and mitigate threats on our banking systems and networks as a whole is to know and understand the motivations of threat actors so that we can stay ahead of them. We must stay on the offensive and I hope we rectify these flaws in our cyber security before another spate of attacks.  If not my sock draw is not looking sp bad for my pennies.
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
5/31/2016 | 10:44:50 AM
Re: 2FA
Yes, you are correct I misread that line. However, outside of organizations that incorporate SWIFT messages there are many that still use single factor authentication as a security measure for internet facing apps.
dritchie
50%
50%
dritchie,
User Rank: Strategist
5/31/2016 | 9:40:17 AM
Re: 2FA
I believe that the article says that "in addition to 2FA" they are looking at implementing additional safety protocols.  3FA anyone?
Jdamon
50%
50%
Jdamon,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/30/2016 | 4:12:18 PM
Re: 2FA
Thanks for this interesting point of view about these new measures
RyanSepe
100%
0%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
5/29/2016 | 12:29:56 PM
2FA
At this point in time its astonishing that banks do not incorporate 2FA.
Commentary
Ransomware Is Not the Problem
Adam Shostack, Consultant, Entrepreneur, Technologist, Game Designer,  6/9/2021
Edge-DRsplash-11-edge-ask-the-experts
How Can I Test the Security of My Home-Office Employees' Routers?
John Bock, Senior Research Scientist,  6/7/2021
News
New Ransomware Group Claiming Connection to REvil Gang Surfaces
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  6/10/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-20733
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Improper authorization in handler for custom URL scheme vulnerability in ????????? (asken diet) for Android versions from v.3.0.0 to v.4.2.x allows a remote attacker to lead a user to access an arbitrary website via the vulnerable App.
CVE-2021-20734
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Cross-site scripting vulnerability in Welcart e-Commerce versions prior to 2.2.4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary script or HTML via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2021-20735
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Cross-site scripting vulnerability in ETUNA EC-CUBE plugins (Delivery slip number plugin (3.0 series) 1.0.10 and earlier, Delivery slip number csv bulk registration plugin (3.0 series) 1.0.8 and earlier, and Delivery slip number mail plugin (3.0 series) 1.0.8 and earlier) allows remote attackers to ...
CVE-2021-20736
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
NoSQL injection vulnerability in GROWI versions prior to v4.2.20 allows a remote attacker to obtain and/or alter the information stored in the database via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2021-20737
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Improper authentication vulnerability in GROWI versions prior to v4.2.20 allows a remote attacker to view the unauthorized pages without access privileges via unspecified vectors.