Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operations

10/29/2019
04:15 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Old RAT, New Moves: Adwind Hides in Java Commands to Target Windows

The Adwind remote access Trojan conceals malicious activity in Java commands to slip past threat intelligence tools and steal user data.

The Adwind jRAT, a remote access Trojan known for targeting login credentials and other data, is adopting new tactics as its operators aim to better conceal malicious activity. Its actors exploit common Java functionality to steal information while evading defensive security tools.

Adwind, related to AlienSpy and also known as Frutas, Unrecom, Sockrat, and JSocket, is a known cross-platform RAT that has been targeting businesses since 2013. It's capable of stealing credentials, system information, and cryptographic keys, as well as keylogging, taking screenshots, and transferring files. This jRAT typically uses phishing emails, infected software, or malicious websites to target a range of platforms including Windows, Linux, and macOS.

A new variant is focused on Windows machines and common Windows applications Explorer and Outlook, report researchers at Menlo Security who detected it about four months ago. Adwind is now going after Chromium-based browsers, including newer browsers such as Brave. Menlo security researcher Krishnan Subramanian says the pivot to Windows was a logical move for Adwind's operators: While the jRAT was platform-agnostic, most of its victims ran Windows.

The latest jRAT variant uses Java to take control over and collect data from a victim's machine. It's specifically after login credentials, says Subramanian, who notes this particular variant has been actively targeting industries like financial services, where login credentials are valuable.

This malware arrives in a JAR file concealed in a link inside a phishing email or downloaded from a legitimate site serving up unsecured third-party content. Researchers also noticed infections coming from outdated and illegitimate Wordpress sites, noting the latter delivery technique is growing popular among cybercriminals capitalizing on vulnerabilities in the publishing platform.

Adwind jRAT arrives in a malicious JAR file, with malware hidden under layers of obfuscation. The initial JAR decrypts, prompting a set of processes that ends with initializing the RAT with the command-and-control (C2) server. Adwind is then able to decrypt a file to access a list of C2 server IP addresses. It chooses one, and an encrypted request is made via TCP port 80 to load another set of JAR files. These activate the jRAT, which becomes functional and can send C2 requests to access and send credentials from the browser to a remote server. Credentials can be from banking websites or business apps, so long as they're from a Windows browser or app.

Hidden in Plain Sight
This variant of Adwind stays hidden by acting like any other Java command. Millions of Java commands flow in and out of an enterprise network, and threat intelligence has little to know heuristics to use for creating a static rule or signature that will detect the initial JAR payload. There is nothing suspicious about its appearance or behavior; on the surface, it seems normal. 

"Malware that takes advantage of common Java functionality is notoriously difficult to detect or detonate in a sandbox for the simple fact that Java is so common on the Web," Subramanian writes in a blog post. As he explains, efforts to block or limit Java on the Web would have far-reaching consequences. It's a nonstarter for those relying on rich web apps or SaaS platforms.

There is one way the Adwind jRAT stands out: Most Java commands don't view and send stolen credentials to a remote server, Subramanian says. This behavior will eventually show itself.

Related Content:

This free, all-day online conference offers a look at the latest tools, strategies, and best practices for protecting your organization’s most sensitive data. Click for more information and, to register, here.

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
SOC 2s & Third-Party Assessments: How to Prevent Them from Being Used in a Data Breach Lawsuit
Beth Burgin Waller, Chair, Cybersecurity & Data Privacy Practice , Woods Rogers PLC,  12/5/2019
Navigating Security in the Cloud
Diya Jolly, Chief Product Officer, Okta,  12/4/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: "This is the last time we hire Game of Thrones Security"
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19230
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
An unsafe deserialization vulnerability exists in CA Release Automation (Nolio) 6.6 with the DataManagement component that can allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2013-0342
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
The CreateID function in packet.py in pyrad before 2.1 uses sequential packet IDs, which makes it easier for remote attackers to spoof packets by predicting the next ID, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0294.
CVE-2014-0242
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
mod_wsgi module before 3.4 for Apache, when used in embedded mode, might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via the Content-Type header which is generated from memory that may have been freed and then overwritten by a separate thread.
CVE-2015-3424
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
SQL injection vulnerability in Accentis Content Resource Management System before the October 2015 patch allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the SIDX parameter.
CVE-2015-3425
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Accentis Content Resource Management System before October 2015 patch allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the ctl00$cph_content$_uig_formState parameter.