Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operations

8/28/2017
05:00 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

New York's Historic FinSec Regulation Covers DDoS, Not Just Data

Starting today, New York banks and insurers must report to authorities within 72 hours on any security event that has a 'reasonable likelihood' of causing material harm to normal operations.

As of today, banks, insurers, and other financial services companies in the state of New York must officially report the kind of cybersecurity incidents that until now most organizations have been able to sweep under the carpet.

The new rules will apply to entities covered by the New York Department of Financial Services' (DFS) new cybersecurity regulation, 23 NYCRR 500, which officially went into effect in March, but hit its first compliance deadline today.

Under 23 NYCRR 500, covered entities must report to the DFS Superintendent within 72 hours any cybersecurity incidents "that have a reasonable likelihood of materially harming any material part of the normal operation of the Covered Entity." 

The regulation does not state under what conditions, if any, an incident needs to be reported to law enforcement, customers, or to the general public. "The regulation specifically relates to the authority that DFS has over its regulated entities. A regulated entity may have other reporting obligations depending on the facts and circumstances, " a DFS spokesperson said.

The regulation requires covered entities to report any incident covered by other regulations as well - therefore, a bank that suffers a PII breach that triggered a PCI violation would also now need to tell DFS.   

More importantly, the new rules would capture many of the significant cybersecurity incidents that currently go uncatalogued and unreported because they are not covered by any formal regulation. Disruptions and denials of service caused by WannaCry, NotPetya, Mirai, or the recent attacks on the SWIFT network, for example, would now be covered (as well as smaller incidents that do not make their way into the news cycle).

However, 23 NYCRR 500 extends beyond operational damage. Any cybersecurity incident that could materially damage the business - like a BEC fraud that cost millions of dollars or an intellectual property theft that jeopardizes the company's market advantage - must also be reported, a DFS representative confirmed. 

Last month, DFS launched a new online portal for reporting incidents. Businesses covered by the regulation must also submit to the Superintendent an annual compliance report, due Feb. 15 each year.

The regulation is the first of its kind in the US. It officially went into effect in March with a series of compliance deadlines staged over two years. Today marks the end of the first transitional period. 

As of today, covered organizations must have a cybersecurity program, a cybersecurity policy, a chief information security officer (who could be employed by either the covered entity or a third party), a security incident response plan, and a process to begin limiting user access priviliges. They also must begin reporting incidents.

By March 2018, covered entities must complete a full infosec risk assessment, conduct penetration testing, conduct end-user awareness training, issue an annual cybersecurity report to internal board-level management, and as a risk assessment deems fit, deploy multi-factor authentication. The regulation specifically calls out multi-factor authentication for any individual accessing internal networks from an external network, unless the CISO has approved reasonably equivalent or more secure controls.

More deadlines hit in September 2018. Organizations will need a secure application development program in place for in-house apps and a process for assessing security of commercial software. This is also when processes for maintaining adequate audit trails (some for at least three years, others for at least five years) data retention, end-user monitoring and data encryption must be in place.

The final piece comes in March 2019, two years after the initial enactment of the regulation, when covered entities must have a third-party service provider security policy. The policy must include due diligence when selecting providers, contractional protections with each third party, and minimum cybersecurity baseline requirements for each third party, including use of access controls and encryption.   

See the full text of 23 NYCRR 500 at DFS.ny.gov.

Learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable CISOs and IT security experts in a setting that is conducive to interaction and conversation. Click for more info and to register.

Related Content:

 

Sara Peters is Senior Editor at Dark Reading and formerly the editor-in-chief of Enterprise Efficiency. Prior that she was senior editor for the Computer Security Institute, writing and speaking about virtualization, identity management, cybersecurity law, and a myriad ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
NicolaiBezsonoff
50%
50%
NicolaiBezsonoff,
User Rank: Author
9/11/2017 | 2:44:32 PM
Step in the right direction
This is a step in the right direction in terms of providing transparency for consumers. Our research shows that organizations of all sizes are getting hit with DDoS attacks, increasing the likelihood that all kinds of financial services firms will be targets. The good news is that these firms are becoming more prepared to mitigate these kinds of attacks, so they do not cause the significant downtime they have caused in the past. 
Data Leak Week: Billions of Sensitive Files Exposed Online
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  12/10/2019
Lessons from the NSA: Know Your Assets
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  12/12/2019
4 Tips to Run Fast in the Face of Digital Transformation
Shane Buckley, President & Chief Operating Officer, Gigamon,  12/9/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-5252
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-14
There is an improper authentication vulnerability in Huawei smartphones (Y9, Honor 8X, Honor 9 Lite, Honor 9i, Y6 Pro). The applock does not perform a sufficient authentication in a rare condition. Successful exploit could allow the attacker to use the application locked by applock in an instant.
CVE-2019-5235
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-14
Some Huawei smart phones have a null pointer dereference vulnerability. An attacker crafts specific packets and sends to the affected product to exploit this vulnerability. Successful exploitation may cause the affected phone to be abnormal.
CVE-2019-5264
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
There is an information disclosure vulnerability in certain Huawei smartphones (Mate 10;Mate 10 Pro;Honor V10;Changxiang 7S;P-smart;Changxiang 8 Plus;Y9 2018;Honor 9 Lite;Honor 9i;Mate 9). The software does not properly handle certain information of applications locked by applock in a rare condition...
CVE-2019-5277
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
Huawei CloudUSM-EUA V600R006C10;V600R019C00 have an information leak vulnerability. Due to improper configuration, the attacker may cause information leak by successful exploitation.
CVE-2019-5254
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
Certain Huawei products (AP2000;IPS Module;NGFW Module;NIP6300;NIP6600;NIP6800;S5700;SVN5600;SVN5800;SVN5800-C;SeMG9811;Secospace AntiDDoS8000;Secospace USG6300;Secospace USG6500;Secospace USG6600;USG6000V;eSpace U1981) have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. An attacker who logs in to the board m...