Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operations

3/18/2015
05:30 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail

New Security Mindset: Focus On The Interior

Chief privacy officer Jason Straight shares his insights on why organizations are struggling to stop the breach wave -- and manage the aftermath.

Jason Straight, senior vice president and chief privacy officer at UnitedLex

Jason Straight, senior vice president and chief privacy officer at UnitedLex

Comment  | 
Print  | 
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Kelly Jackson Higgins
50%
50%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
5/8/2015 | 7:42:28 AM
Re: An Outline for a Quick and Dirty InfoSec Governance Team
@Christian, thanks for sharing this. A nice addition to Straight's insights. 
RetiredUser
50%
50%
RetiredUser,
User Rank: Ninja
5/7/2015 | 5:15:37 PM
An Outline for a Quick and Dirty InfoSec Governance Team
This was a great interview and one of the most packed I've read in recent weeks with take-away material for research and reflection.  The notes on how focus on the wrong things for organizations when it comes to InfoSec rings true.  While not entirely focused on the "interior" I have a simplistic model below that does put focus on three key areas that ultimately translate to improving the integrity of "interior" data and processes.  

Not to oversimplify Information Security and the complex roles that need to be filled for organization-wide coverage, but these three points are great shortcuts to establishing an InfoSec governance team, especially for small orgs that may not have the resources for a formal loss prevention lifecycle.  Because the environment elements often overlap with these states, you then can have the same person (for very small teams) take more than one function.  

Org Function 1:

* Governs architecture/standards/implementation/lifecycle:  Network data that is in transit, flowing across internal networks and to the outside world (i.e., data on the wire and in the air). 

Org Function 2:

* Governs architecture/standards/implementation/lifecycle:  Data that is at rest on servers, databases, file shares, Intranet sites, workstations, laptops, mobile devices, portable storage, backup tapes, removable media, cloud storage. 

Org Function 3:

*  Governs usage standards/auditing/lifecycle:  Data that is in use in temporary memory on a local machine, an open report or running query on a workstation, an email that has been drafted but not sent, a file being copied to a USB drive, and data being copied and pasted from one local document to another. 

Feeding into all three of these areas would be incident response root cause analysis reports for continuous improvement for each lifecycle and their interfaces. 

A tight, compact approach to InfoSec and one that could improve upon some of the shortcomings this article mentions.

(Nod to Ernst & Young's 2011 data security report for some of the above verbiage.)
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
3/19/2015 | 3:06:13 PM
Re: Perimeter Emphasis

I agree. External and internal; security measures. Unless it is layered it does not really matter what you do in any side of your network perimeter.

Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
3/19/2015 | 3:03:51 PM
Re: Excellent interview of a person who has a clear understanding of information security. Thanks!

"You need to make sure Legal has a formal and well-defined role in IR before there's an incident"

I completely agree with this, at the end of the day, an incident would have a legal liability, you may want to cover that aspect of it from the beginning.

Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
3/19/2015 | 3:01:23 PM
Re: Excellent interview of a person who has a clear understanding of information security. Thanks!

I would not categorize humans as most sophisticated detection devices, they are sophisticated for sure and because of that could to really detect anything unless it is absolutely made visible to them. If we can take humans out of security equation we will be in better shape.

Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
3/19/2015 | 2:56:20 PM
An industry was created
I do not have an evidence to prove what I am saying here, there is a real industry is created on the security, security insurance, security devices and applications  companies are living their golden days. You can not create an industry by just hacking, there must be big investors and supports of this industry that we may not be aware of.
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
3/19/2015 | 11:43:12 AM
Perimeter Emphasis
This was a great interview. I didin't realize how much emphasis was put on perimeter defenses and how underutilized internal defenses were until Jason alluded to this. Looking at it now, that fact couldn't have been more prevalent. I agree with his statements in the first step to moving towards increasing the security posture internally is to change the mind set of the human element with frequent human training sessions backed by the executives. Otherwise, we will continue to build these walls to the sky.
Kelly Jackson Higgins
50%
50%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
3/19/2015 | 11:20:22 AM
Re: Excellent interview of a person who has a clear understanding of information security. Thanks!
Thank you for sharing your thoughts, @xmarksthespot. I think Straight's perspective as both a lawyer and a cyber security expert make his insights even more interesting and helpful.
xmarksthespot
50%
50%
xmarksthespot,
User Rank: Strategist
3/19/2015 | 2:50:30 AM
Excellent interview of a person who has a clear understanding of information security. Thanks!
Jason Straight has a clear understanding of core security principles. "I'm not saying forget the perimeter. It's got to be a balance, with a focus on the interior, too":  This is a well-crafted statement by Straight.  Defense-in-depth is a core security principle.

It appears he includes 2 factor authentication as part of internal security, but in my mind it also can be authentication via a site on the web, like some banks are now supporting, which is external.  It seems to me like the one other area internally is encryption of data at rest and data in transit (all internal network traffic). 

The human layer is definitely the most vulnerable, but I don't agree that is an intractable problem. ... Human beings are the most sophisticated detection devices you've got". - Another golden nugget from Mr. Straight. 

He has a good point where the security industry is pushing for people to purchase more and more endpoint solutions out there, and the focus should be internal controls.

Thank you, Jason Straight
How Attackers Infiltrate the Supply Chain & What to Do About It
Shay Nahari, Head of Red-Team Services at CyberArk,  7/16/2019
US Mayors Commit to Just Saying No to Ransomware
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/16/2019
The Problem with Proprietary Testing: NSS Labs vs. CrowdStrike
Brian Monkman, Executive Director at NetSecOPEN,  7/19/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-3414
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
All versions up to V1.19.20.02 of ZTE OTCP product are impacted by XSS vulnerability. Due to XSS, when an attacker invokes the security management to obtain the resources of the specified operation code owned by a user, the malicious script code could be transmitted in the parameter. If the front en...
CVE-2019-10102
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
tcpdump.org tcpdump 4.9.2 is affected by: CWE-126: Buffer Over-read. The impact is: May expose Saved Frame Pointer, Return Address etc. on stack. The component is: line 234: "ND_PRINT((ndo, "%s", buf));", in function named "print_prefix", in "print-hncp.c". Th...
CVE-2019-10102
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
aubio 0.4.8 and earlier is affected by: null pointer. The impact is: crash. The component is: filterbank. The attack vector is: pass invalid arguments to new_aubio_filterbank. The fixed version is: after commit eda95c9c22b4f0b466ae94c4708765eaae6e709e.
CVE-2019-10102
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
aubio 0.4.8 and earlier is affected by: Buffer Overflow. The impact is: buffer overflow in strcpy. The component is: tempo. The fixed version is: after commit b1559f4c9ce2b304d8d27ffdc7128b6795ca82e5.
CVE-2019-10102
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
aubio 0.4.8 and earlier is affected by: null pointer. The impact is: crash (DoS). The component is: onset. The fixed version is: after commit e4e0861cffbc8d3a53dcd18f9ae85797690d67c7.