Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operations

9/28/2016
11:15 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
0%
100%

More Than Half Of IT Pros Employ Insecure Data Wiping Methods

Recent study shows most enterprise IT professionals incorrectly believe emptying a Recycle Bin or reformatting a computer drive permanently erases data.

A recent study found that nearly half of IT pros surveyed don't know how to permanently erase data from a drive, leaving potentially confidential and sensitive data languishing on devices.

The study by Blancco Technology Group, which surveyed over 400 IT professionals, found that 51% of respondents believe emptying a Recycle Bin permanently deletes files. When asked whether they believe performing a quick format and/or full reformat of a computer’s entire drive would permanently erase data, another 51% replied "Yes."

"I was surprised by how many IT professionals did not understand the difference between 'deleting' and 'permanently erasing' files," says Richard Stiennon, chief strategy officer of data erasure company Blancco Technology Group. "Part of the problem is that the terms 'delete' and 'erase' are confusing and misleading."  

Dragging files into and emptying a Recycle Bin on computers or reformatting drives doesn't erase data from that computer. "These methods only mark the disk space as reusable so data isn't fully wiped and can be recovered easily with the use of free data recovery tools," he says. Erasing data involves overwriting data on a storage device multiple times to render it fully unrecoverable, he adds.

Data removal has not historically been given as much weight threat-wise as malware, extortion hacks, backdoor attacks, and accidental insider threats, for example. That could be one reason we're seeing such a high percentage of IT pros who don't know how to properly erase data, Stiennon says.

When it comes to actually wiping company-owned computers, 22% of respondents say they reformat the entire drive, and 31% wipe individual files by using the "delete" button and dragging the files to the Recycle Bin. In other words, 53% of IT professionals use two ineffective and insecure methods to wipe active files.

Only 9% of respondents actually pay to use an erasure tool to permanently erase the entire drive.

Stiennon says squeezed IT budgets are keeping organizations from gaining the resources, tools, and staff to implement proper data removal methods. "[IT pros] end up using more accessible, but less secure methods and tools, which puts them in a very dangerous situation and leaves their corporate, customer, and employee data at risk of loss/theft," he says.

Despite the lack of best practices when it comes to data erasure, the study found that organizations recognize the risks of incomplete/improper data removal.

When asked to rank a list of 14 security threats by risk level on a scale of one (lowest) to 14 (highest), incomplete/improper data removal ranked at the top, at 9.44. Next in line were backdoor attacks (6.17), extortion hacks (6.42), malware (6.23), and accidental insider threats (6.60).

Steinnon believes that this newer focus on proper data erasure is a positive sign for the state of data security and privacy. "It suggests that organizations may be starting to change the way they think about and approach how data is managed across its entire lifecycle – from creation to collection to storage to archival to transfer to destruction."

Related Content:

 

Emily Johnson is the digital content editor for InformationWeek. Prior to this role, Emily worked within UBM America's technology group as an associate editor on their content marketing team. Emily started her career at UBM in 2011 and spent four and a half years in content ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
7 Truths About BEC Scams
Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer,  6/13/2019
DNS Firewalls Could Prevent Billions in Losses to Cybercrime
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  6/13/2019
Can Your Patching Strategy Keep Up with the Demands of Open Source?
Tim Mackey, Principal Security Strategist, CyRC, at Synopsys,  6/18/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-1874
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-20
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Prime Service Catalog Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protection mechanisms on the web-ba...
CVE-2019-1875
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-20
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Prime Service Catalog could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the web-based interface. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input by t...
CVE-2019-1876
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-20
A vulnerability in the HTTPS proxy feature of Cisco Wide Area Application Services (WAAS) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to use the Central Manager as an HTTPS proxy. The vulnerability is due to insufficient authentication of proxy connection requests. An attacker could exp...
CVE-2019-1878
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-20
A vulnerability in the Cisco Discovery Protocol (CDP) implementation for the Cisco TelePresence Codec (TC) and Collaboration Endpoint (CE) Software could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to inject arbitrary shell commands that are executed by the device. The vulnerability is due to insuff...
CVE-2019-1879
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-20
A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco Integrated Management Controller (IMC) could allow an authenticated, local attacker to inject arbitrary commands that are executed with root privileges. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input at the CLI. An attacker could exploi...