Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operations

MITRE ATT&CK Framework Not Just for the Big Guys

At Black Hat, analysts from MITRE and Splunk will detail how organizations of many different sizes are leveraging ATT&CK's common language.

Biology, zoology, and related sciences have a tool to help scientists around the world communicate with one another: scientific names. These scientific names, generally rooted in Latin, provide a common set of terms for animals, plants, virii, and other living things. When it comes to cybersecurity, though, things are a bit less rigorous, and creativity can be the enemy of precision. That's where the MITRE ATT&CK framework comes in.

At its heart, ATT&CK is a database of the tools and techniques hackers use to attack, damage, and disrupt computer operations. Displayed as a grid, ATT&CK shows the various stages of an attack and the tools that can be used for each one. It does so in a language that can be understood among researchers in different departments, on different continents, and who speak different languages.

Ryan Kovar, principal security strategist at Splunk, says he has seen companies around the world use ATT&CK in their security work. "The people who are using it now are taking the taxonomy from ATT&CK, changing it to meet their needs, and then using it to describe, across multiple teams, what's going on," he says.

The common language is critical, says Katie Nickels, MITRE threat intelligence lead. "The common framework can provide a way to talk about the threats among different groups and defenders," she says. "With the common language, it can be used for red teams to decide what they're going to be doing. They all kind of work together."

One of the points both Nickels and Kovar stress is how ATT&CK can be used by organizations of many different sizes. For example, Kovar says he worked with a small company in the Midwest whose CISO was concerned about APT10 targeting his organization. Using the ATT&CK framework, "I was able to show him the names people came up with for the group, what they did, and who they went after," Kovar says. "The CISO was able to take the information back to his board of directors and explain that APT10 was unlikely to target a company in their industry."

Different types of organizations use ATT&CK in different ways, Nickels says. Vendors tend to come at the framework from a tools point of view, while most companies will look at ways in which they can base operations on the framework. For those companies, she says, "You get the most power from ATT&CK when you use it across teams. You can use it on the detection team and then pass what they learn to the red team for testing, using the same language."

At Black Hat USA, Nickels and Kovar will present a briefing, "MITRE ATT&CK: The Play at Home Edition," during which they will show attendees how to use the framework in organizations of different sizes and types. Their goal is for attendees to "hit the ground running" when they get back from the conference.

Related Content:

 

Black Hat USA returns to Las Vegas with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier security solutions, and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

 

Curtis Franklin Jr. is Senior Editor at Dark Reading. In this role he focuses on product and technology coverage for the publication. In addition he works on audio and video programming for Dark Reading and contributes to activities at Interop ITX, Black Hat, INsecurity, and ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
tdsan
50%
50%
tdsan,
User Rank: Ninja
7/19/2019 | 8:22:15 PM
Attack Online Grid
https://mitre-attack.github.io/attack-navigator/enterprise/ or Attack Navigator

The online grid is great, right click on an element, press select, then click on view technique, this provides a page that details on what is using that exploit, this is good for identying the threat, the techniques they use but it does not provide the ways to mitigate. Google's ProjectZero provide the code and way to mitigate the variant or method of attack.

What I do like is that there are numerous resources from FireEye, Google, McAfee, Symantec and other sources that have validated the attack problem, this is very good, a way to verify and cross-reference the attack.

I think the next evolution would be to implement a guide that provides the solution or fix to the vulnerability or threat. This should be cross-referenced by multiple sites to ensure what we are proposing actulaly fixes or resolves the problem. Also, if the solution was identified on a Linux or Windows machine, then some sort of code could be used to mitigate the problem, short or long term.

Todd

 
SOC 2s & Third-Party Assessments: How to Prevent Them from Being Used in a Data Breach Lawsuit
Beth Burgin Waller, Chair, Cybersecurity & Data Privacy Practice , Woods Rogers PLC,  12/5/2019
Cybersecurity Team Holiday Guide: 2019 Gag Gift Edition
Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer,  12/2/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19645
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
alter.c in SQLite through 3.30.1 allows attackers to trigger infinite recursion via certain types of self-referential views in conjunction with ALTER TABLE statements.
CVE-2019-19678
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
In "Xray Test Management for Jira" prior to version 3.5.5, remote authenticated attackers can cause XSS in the generic field entry point via the Generic Test Definition field of a new Generic Test issue.
CVE-2019-19679
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
In "Xray Test Management for Jira" prior to version 3.5.5, remote authenticated attackers can cause XSS in the Pre-Condition Summary entry point via the summary field of a Create Pre-Condition action for a new Test Issue.
CVE-2019-19647
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
radare2 through 4.0.0 lacks validation of the content variable in the function r_asm_pseudo_incbin at libr/asm/asm.c, ultimately leading to an arbitrary write. This allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted input.
CVE-2019-19648
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
In the macho_parse_file functionality in macho/macho.c of YARA 3.11.0, command_size may be inconsistent with the real size. A specially crafted MachO file can cause an out-of-bounds memory access, resulting in Denial of Service (application crash) or potential code execution.