Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operations

1/31/2018
02:20 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

K-12 Study Gives Schools Low Marks for Protecting Student Privacy Online

Survey says local school districts and education departments lack even the most basic security and privacy safeguards.

A new study released today by EdTech Strategies found that the websites of leading state education departments and local school districts lack even the most basic online security and privacy protections.

Douglas Levin, president of the Arlington, Va., consulting group, says his study comes out in the context of an intense discussion the past several years about the online privacy of students.

"We need to protect students, but in many ways that is too narrow a focus,” Levin says. "Keep in mind that technology is used at school districts for human resources, food, health and transportation, and it is also used by educators and parents."

Levin based the study on automated and manual reviews of the 50 state department of education websites and the websites of 159 K-12 school districts nationally. The study, "Tracking EDU: Education Agency Website Security" was conducted from October 2017 to January of this year.

Here are some highlights from the study:

Lack of secure browsing. Most state and local education websites do not support secure browsing, which puts both schools and websites at risk. And, at least 12 states offer no HTTPS support for secure browsing: Arkansas, Connecticut, Kansas, Maryland, Mississippi, Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia or Washington.

Widespread use of tracking cookies. Virtually every state and local district (158 out of 159 tracked) has partnered with online advertising companies to deploy sophisticated user tracking and surveillance on their websites.  Many states and the vast majority of local school district websites do not disclose the presence and nature of this ad tracking and user surveillance, or the mechanism for how users can opt out of these data collections.

Absence of privacy policies. Nearly 15% of state department of education websites do not publish a privacy policy of any kind. Of the 43 state agencies that publish a privacy policy, only 32 disclosed the use of ad tracking or surveillance cookies.

Noncompliance with Google terms of service. Despite the near universal deployment of Google Analytics on state and local education websites, only four state and two local school districts were found in compliance with Google’s terms of service which require specific privacy-related disclosures by its customers to their users, including what data is collected, and how users can opt out.

Moving forward, Levin says K-12 state departments of education and schools district should consider deploying HTTPS to offer more secure web browsing, and find ways to notify users of the presence of ad trackers. He says the websites posted by the states of Maine and Utah demonstrate that state and local agency websites can offer meaningful experiences to parents, educators and other stakeholders that offer privacy without resorting to invasive and undisclosed ad tracking. Maine, for example does not record personal information without the user’s permission.

Follow this link for a more complete list of action items.

Related Content:

 

Steve Zurier has more than 30 years of journalism and publishing experience and has covered networking, security, and IT as a writer and editor since 1992. Steve is based in Columbia, Md. View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
2/1/2018 | 8:11:50 AM
THINK SCHOOLS ARE BAD? TRY A MEDICAL OFFICE
When I was an indeppendent consultant, my worst clients in terms of security and basic funding issues were medical professionals.  Forget HIIPA considerations.  They all hated to write to check and had zero understanding really of secure private patient data.  In part because their own minds are so full of medical data that perhaps they have no room for other stuff.  We all have that problem to a degree.
When It Comes To Security Tools, More Isn't More
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  1/11/2021
US Capitol Attack a Wake-up Call for the Integration of Physical & IT Security
Seth Rosenblatt, Contributing Writer,  1/11/2021
IoT Vendor Ubiquiti Suffers Data Breach
Dark Reading Staff 1/11/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2020: The Year in Security
Download this Tech Digest for a look at the biggest security stories that - so far - have shaped a very strange and stressful year.
Flash Poll
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises
COVID-19 has created a new IT paradigm in the enterprise -- and a new level of cybersecurity risk. This report offers a look at how enterprises are assessing and managing cyber-risk under the new normal.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-25533
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-15
An issue was discovered in Malwarebytes before 4.0 on macOS. A malicious application was able to perform a privileged action within the Malwarebytes launch daemon. The privileged service improperly validated XPC connections by relying on the PID instead of the audit token. An attacker can construct ...
CVE-2021-3162
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-15
Docker Desktop Community before 2.5.0.0 on macOS mishandles certificate checking, leading to local privilege escalation.
CVE-2021-21242
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-15
OneDev is an all-in-one devops platform. In OneDev before version 4.0.3, there is a critical vulnerability which can lead to pre-auth remote code execution. AttachmentUploadServlet deserializes untrusted data from the `Attachment-Support` header. This Servlet does not enforce any authentication or a...
CVE-2021-21245
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-15
OneDev is an all-in-one devops platform. In OneDev before version 4.0.3, AttachmentUploadServlet also saves user controlled data (`request.getInputStream()`) to a user specified location (`request.getHeader("File-Name")`). This issue may lead to arbitrary file upload which can be used to u...
CVE-2021-21246
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-15
OneDev is an all-in-one devops platform. In OneDev before version 4.0.3, the REST UserResource endpoint performs a security check to make sure that only administrators can list user details. However for the `/users/` endpoint there are no security checks enforced so it is possible to retrieve ar...