Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operations

10/23/2019
04:15 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

IoTopia Framework Aims to Bring Security to Device Manufacturers

GlobalPlatform launches an initiative to help companies secure connected devices and services across markets.

IoTopia, a new framework for IoT security, aims to standardize the design, certification, deployment, and management of connected services and services, GlobalPlatform reports.

This initiative marks the latest effort to build on IoT security by the industry standards body, whose members work to ensure its specifications align with current and emerging market requirements. GlobalPlatform has 2,600 industry representatives from 90 member companies, and people around the world rely on its certified secure elements, which have been integrated in chip-enabled credit cards, smartphones, smart TVs, and control units built into vehicles.

As the Internet of Things continues to expand, so, too, do GlobalPlatform's efforts to better secure it, says executive director Kevin Gillick. "We're progressing farther into this world of interconnected devices everywhere," he explains. "The same component technology and the same security mindset is logically extensible into this new space."

The IoT is the "wild, wild west," Gillick continues. Device makers are entering the ecosystem and creating connected products without bringing security into the picture. Part of GlobalPlatform's effort involves sharing standardization to bring products to market faster, at a lower price. It makes more sense, he says, for manufacturers to invest R&D into a service they can build their brands around rather than in their own security architectures and certifications.

"There is a lack of a common IoT security framework," he adds. Device manufacturers don't have security at the core of their competence; many avoid it because of the bias that adding more protection will increase cost and time to market. The idea behind IoTopia is to help these makers implement a framework that helps them move forward wihout bring security experts.

"We're seeing a lot of industry associations crop up around IoT who talk a lot about requirements, talk about security and use cases, but don't tell you how to implement it into technology," Gillick says. "Moving from words and speech to something actionable and adoptable is [a gap] no one has been able to close."

IoTopia is based on four pillars. The first is security by design, which includes capabilities and features that define how secure components and APIs can be used with existing "secure by design" standards. The second pillar is device intent. IoTopia uses Internet Engineering Task Force's manufacturer usage descriptions and uniform resource identifier to manage device permissions and access on networks, GlobalPlatform explains.

"We want to make sure we have in place a simple way to answer important questions about the device," Gillick says. "What is this thing? Who is responsible for it? How do I protect it, and how do I protect my business? Is it doing what it should be doing? … There's no systematic way to go about doing that."

The third pillar addresses autonomous, scalable, secure device onboarding (SDO), as IoTopia will offer an open, standards-based secure onboarding process to streamline network administration. The fourth focuses on device life cycle management, including a range of capabilities to manage devices throughout their life cycles aligned with international regulations.

Related Content:

This free, all-day online conference offers a look at the latest tools, strategies, and best practices for protecting your organization’s most sensitive data. Click for more information and, to register, here.

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Cybersecurity Team Holiday Guide: 2019 Gag Gift Edition
Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer,  12/2/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19647
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
radare2 through 4.0.0 lacks validation of the content variable in the function r_asm_pseudo_incbin at libr/asm/asm.c, ultimately leading to an arbitrary write. This allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted input.
CVE-2019-19648
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
In the macho_parse_file functionality in macho/macho.c of YARA 3.11.0, command_size may be inconsistent with the real size. A specially crafted MachO file can cause an out-of-bounds memory access, resulting in Denial of Service (application crash) or potential code execution.
CVE-2019-19642
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-08
On SuperMicro X8STi-F motherboards with IPMI firmware 2.06 and BIOS 02.68, the Virtual Media feature allows OS Command Injection by authenticated attackers who can send HTTP requests to the IPMI IP address. This requires a POST to /rpc/setvmdrive.asp with shell metacharacters in ShareHost or ShareNa...
CVE-2019-19637
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-08
An issue was discovered in libsixel 1.8.2. There is an integer overflow in the function sixel_decode_raw_impl at fromsixel.c.
CVE-2019-19638
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-08
An issue was discovered in libsixel 1.8.2. There is a heap-based buffer overflow in the function load_pnm at frompnm.c, due to an integer overflow.