Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operations

9/11/2018
05:40 PM
Dark Reading
Dark Reading
Products and Releases
50%
50%

Global Report Card Survey Reveals Cybersecurity Program Trends Since 2017

GPAs are on the rise with security pros feeling more confident than ever before; Automation and training are key to getting an A grade.

SEATTLE, Sept. 10, 2018 /PRNewswire/ -- Just in time for the beginning of a new school year, DomainTools released its second annual Cybersecurity Report Card in which security professionals were surveyed about their security posture and asked to grade the overall health of their programs.The annual survey of more than 500 security professionals revealed that the health of cybersecurity programs has improved over the past year. The report also sheds light on how cybersecurity practices are evolving, and what successful organizations are doing to adapt to the ever-changing threat landscape.

In spite of today's volatile security climate, the research shows infosec professionals feel more confident now than in previous years due to a greater investment in automated processes, threat intelligence solutions, and a commitment to company-wide training. When compared to 2017, the percentage of respondents that said their organization should be graded as a C or lower declined. Looking at the grades overall, it's clear that organizations surveyed have refined and improved their security posture.

"In the midst of a seemingly never-ending flow of attacks, this annual report provides insight into the approaches that will take security grades from an F to an A." said Corin Imai, DomainTools' Sr. Product Marketing Manager. "It's notable that A and B grades come from a strategic use of automation and that we are seeing a decrease in the number of teams using manual processes."

Additional findings revealed the success behind this year's top cybersecurity programs and grade A security pros include:

Automation: 92 percent of grade A companies said they use automation to simplify time consuming processes. Conversely, D and F companies said their processes are highly manual.

Training: 5 percent more organizations plan to step up security awareness training in the coming year than did last year, and the number that intend to skip training initiatives decreased by half from 2017.

Threat intelligence: 82 percent of security professionals find value in using DNS-based threat intelligence.

Expand to a larger threat infrastructure map: 71 percent of grade A organizations have the ability to expand from one indicator to a larger map of threat infrastructure, but 35 percent of organizations still lack in this area.

Forensic analysis: A and B organizations were more likely to follow-up on clues and evidence and conduct forensic analysis of compromised machines compared to D and F teams.

The report also looked at the most common threat vectors that organizations detect and found that one-third of organizations detect malicious activity – predominantly from malware, spear-phishing, ransomware and business email compromise – several times every day. Among organizations that did report a breach in 2018, fewer indicated they "did not know" whether they were targeted or not than in 2017.

The survey was conducted by DomainTools in July 2018, and polled 525 global security professionals and executives working in finance, government, healthcare, retail, technology and other industries in organizations of 10,000+ employees. Regions include North America, EMEA, APAC and LATAM. A breakdown of the respondents' titles, roles and industries are provided below.

Read the DomainTools 2018 Cybersecurity Report Card to get the full story behind the numbers and best practices. Download the report now.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
The Problem with Proprietary Testing: NSS Labs vs. CrowdStrike
Brian Monkman, Executive Director at NetSecOPEN,  7/19/2019
RDP Bug Takes New Approach to Host Compromise
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/18/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-14248
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-24
In libnasm.a in Netwide Assembler (NASM) 2.14.xx, asm/pragma.c allows a NULL pointer dereference in process_pragma, search_pragma_list, and nasm_set_limit when "%pragma limit" is mishandled.
CVE-2019-14249
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-24
dwarf_elf_load_headers.c in libdwarf before 2019-07-05 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (division by zero) via an ELF file with a zero-size section group (SHT_GROUP), as demonstrated by dwarfdump.
CVE-2019-14250
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-24
An issue was discovered in GNU libiberty, as distributed in GNU Binutils 2.32. simple_object_elf_match in simple-object-elf.c does not check for a zero shstrndx value, leading to an integer overflow and resultant heap-based buffer overflow.
CVE-2019-14247
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-24
The scan() function in mad.c in mpg321 0.3.2 allows remote attackers to trigger an out-of-bounds write via a zero bitrate in an MP3 file.
CVE-2019-2873
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-23
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox component of Oracle Virtualization (subcomponent: Core). Supported versions that are affected are Prior to 5.2.32 and prior to 6.0.10. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox...