Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


12:45 PM
Tony Buffomante
Tony Buffomante
Connect Directly
E-Mail vvv

Cyber Monday, Consumers & The Bottom Line Of A Data Breach

Yes retailers can achieve ROI for their investments in cybersecurity during the upcoming holiday season - and for the rest of the year, too! Here's how.

Cyber Monday retail sales have been on a steady upward trajectory since 2013, topping more than $3 billion last year and expected to reach $3.36 billion in revenue this year. Adobe, which tracks these numbers, anticipates that the annual online shopping day will “continue to be the largest revenue day of the holiday season.”

To get a slice of that growing revenue pie – on Cyber Monday and every day of the year – retailers are trying everything they can to engage existing and new customers. This often means better on-line or mobile interfaces, faster shipping, and more convenient checkout options.

It also means protecting customers’  information from cyberattack, which would bring positive sales momentum to a screeching halt and cause reputational damage with serious repercussions to the bottom line.

According to the KPMG Cyber Services “Consumer Loss Barometer” nearly 20% of consumers say they would stop shopping at a retailer if they learned that a retailer had experienced a hack. One-fifth of their customer base, gone and not coming back. Our survey also found that of the remaining 80%, nearly half (49%) say that it will take six months for them to build their trust back with a brand and continue shopping.                 

Despite that daunting outlook, many retailers are either blissfully unaware or woefully underprepared for the present risk factors in the industry. According again to the “Consumer Loss Barometer:”

  • 89% of retailers have experienced a data breach in the past two years
  • 42% of retailers don’t have an executive in charge of cybersecurity
  • 55% of retailers haven’t invested in cybersecurity in the past year.

Why are retailers choosing to operate as if cybersecurity isn’t important?

One reason is ROI. Even in the aftermath of high profile breaches at major retailers like Target, Home Depot or Eddie Bauer, investment in cybersecurity protection is often hindered by the tough question of how to measure the bottom line impact. Where an investment in marketing can show immediate ROI in increased sales, traffic and brand awareness, an investment in cybersecurity does little to boost consumer confidence or increase shopping habits.

Or does it?

Conventional wisdom holds that it is hard for retailers to see cybersecurity as a priority because they operate at such razor thin margins; that given the choice between spending on marketing or cybersecurity, legacy thinking – marketing - typically wins.

These failures to invest in cybersecurity are not only dangerous, they are missed opportunities to grow a customer base. Our KPMG research shows that consumers see cybersecurity as a brand builder. For example, 68% of respondents said that a “lack of a solid plan to prevent future attacks” would lead them away from shopping with that retailer again.

According to the KPMG “Barometer,” shoppers are also more likely to do more business with that brand when the company is transparent about its cybersecurity efforts and, in the event of a hack, how they remediate the problem and take care of their customers. In fact, 53% of those same customers stated that a “lack of timely acknowledgement/response from the retailer providing details of the incident and impact on customers” would contribute to them not shopping with that retailer again. Retailers can take their customer communication a step further by offering tips on how consumers can protect themselves while shopping online and creating educational material around that theme.

Cyber Monday sales are likely to keep growing – as will competition for those shoppers. A retailer that wants to protect its existing customer base and also stand-out to new customers, needs to consider cybersecurity as more than an extraneous expense. As our “Consumer Loss Barometer” shows, it’s also a way to build a trusting consumer base that will eventually ensure a return on that investment.

Related Content:



Tony Buffomante is the US cyber security services leader for KPMG based in Chicago. Over the past 16 years, he has managed and executed Information Technology (IT) security, audit and control reviews and implementations for some of the largest companies in the United States, ... View Full Bio

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/25/2020
Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, when determining the common dimension size of two tensors, TFLite uses a `DCHECK` which is no-op outside of debug compilation modes. Since the function always returns the dimension of the first tensor, malicious attackers can ...
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, a crafted TFLite model can force a node to have as input a tensor backed by a `nullptr` buffer. This can be achieved by changing a buffer index in the flatbuffer serialization to convert a read-only tensor to a read-write one....
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, if a TFLite saved model uses the same tensor as both input and output of an operator, then, depending on the operator, we can observe a segmentation fault or just memory corruption. We have patched the issue in d58c96946b and ...
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, saved models in the flatbuffer format use a double indexing scheme: a model has a set of subgraphs, each subgraph has a set of operators and each operator has a set of input/output tensors. The flatbuffer format uses indices f...
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, models using segment sum can trigger writes outside of bounds of heap allocated buffers by inserting negative elements in the segment ids tensor. Users having access to `segment_ids_data` can alter `output_index` and then write to outside of `outpu...