Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operations

10/24/2019
04:55 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

40% of Security Pros Job Hunting as Satisfaction Drops

Symptoms of job dissatisfaction creep into an industry already plagued with gaps in diversity and work-life balance.

Security professionals are reporting lower levels of job satisfaction, a sign of trouble for an industry struggling with higher stress levels and lower work-life balance, researchers report.

To gain a better sense of skills, salary, satisfaction, and stress in today's security industry, Exabeam researchers polled 479 security professionals in the US, UK, Canada, India, Australia, and the Netherlands. Their results show 71% of respondents are "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with their positions in 2019, compared with 83% in 2018. More than three-quarters say they feel secure in their jobs, and 78% say they would recommend a career in security, they report.

"It's not clear what contributed to the drop," says Trevor Daughney, vice president at Exabeam. "However, symptoms of job dissatisfaction were visible elsewhere in the report."

Sixty-two percent of respondents say their jobs are "stressful" or "very stressful," he adds, and 44% feel they lack work-life balance. "It is a struggle," says Charity Wright, security intelligence threat researcher at IntSights, pointing to the industry's talent shortage. "A lot of it would be relieved if we had more people. … If we had more people, our workload wouldn't be so heavy."

Forty percent of respondents are actively job searching. More than half (51%) are motivated by poor compensation and unsupportive leadership, which is interesting given the median salary is $75,000 to $100,000 and 53% of respondents report salary satisfaction — up 35% from last year.

Salary satisfaction fluctuated by job title: CISOs were the most satisfied (64%) and report a median salary of $125,000 to $150,000. They were followed by cybersecurity analysts and threat/intel research analysts (59%), who reported a salary of $50,000 to $75,000, and information security analysts (58%), who reported the same salary range. Information security directors have the highest median earnings at $175,000 to $200,000, and 57% reported salary satisfaction.

While important, salary isn't the only factor in job satisfaction. Nearly 60% of respondents say a challenging and engaging work environment is the most rewarding aspect of their position, with many of them prioritizing this over salary. A lack of advancement opportunities was the least satisfying aspect of any security job, researchers report. It seems businesses often have difficulty providing employees with sufficient challenges without overburdening them.

"Allowing for both professional challenges and intermittent reprieve in a high-stress environment seems to remain a challenge for security organizations," says Daughney.

Which responsibilities are most common among security pros? Audit and compliance was the most popular (36%), followed by incident response (28%), application security (21%), endpoint security (19%), and leadership (18%). Threat intelligence proved the least common task (<1%). This isn't surprising, says Daughney, as most organizations have automated the process of collecting and distributing intelligence across their security ecosystem. Other tasks, like security training and penetration testing, are usually only done by a small number of people, he adds.

"We aren't surprised that audit and compliance was the most common responsibility," says Daughney. "Compliance is table stakes for most organizations and is often prioritized ahead of security." It was somewhat surprising to see incident response in second place, he continues. This suggests breaches remain common and the response process is manual and time-intensive.

Some responsibilities have a greater effect on satisfaction than others; for example, malware analysis and security architecture each had a 96% satisfaction rate, followed by security operations center management (90%), network security (87%), cloud application security (85%), application security (82%), and compliance reporting (79%). Security education and training fell in last place, with only 22% of respondents reporting satisfaction with these responsibilities.

Diversity Challenges Persist
More than 90% of respondents were male, an increase from 90% in 2018 and proof of security's gender gap. Further, only 3% of respondents were African-American, 13% were Asian, and 9% were Latino/Hispanic. Caucasians made up 65% of total respondents.

It's no secret the security industry is overwhelmingly male; however, its women are growing more vocal about challenges they face. "Gender discrimination happens in subtle ways that it's not easy to see outright," says Wright, who belongs to communities of women in security who have been sharing negative experiences of gender harassment and bullying in the workplace. Some are up against peers who say they're not as smart, as capable, or as technical as men.

"One of the things I've noticed is that women are not applying for IT jobs as much as men," Wright points out. Women outside IT are open to career change but don't think they would qualify for jobs in the space because they lack knowledge and experience; as a result, they hesitate to apply. Men, she says, are much more confident in their ability to step into a new career, even one that might be more technical or challenging than what they're used to.

"I think it's a problem with just getting them to apply," she adds. "Anybody can learn this field. You can start in an entry-level role and in the interview, tell them what your valuable skills are, what you're good at. … It's mind-blowing for them, that [women would] even try to do that."

Progress is being made, adds Yumi Nishiyama, Exabeam's director of global services, who says that when she started in the industry, she was often the only female among male colleagues. "Now, years later, the community of women has gotten stronger and incredibly welcoming and embracing," she says. "It's been slow, but it's changing.

Dark Reading

This free, all-day online conference offers a look at the latest tools, strategies, and best practices for protecting your organization’s most sensitive data. Click for more information and, to register, here.

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
ChrisK92103
50%
50%
ChrisK92103,
User Rank: Author
10/30/2019 | 4:59:47 PM
Curious the vertical analysis...
Thought the drop noted here is notable, it's not clear how this messaging is stacking up against other like industries... for example, where do IT infrastucture people compare.

Security and its many disciplines are tough jobs.  You're usually an overhead function, which means constant budget pressure, especially if you don't have a clear risk management process/plan. Security leaders have a difficult time navigating what the relationship with the board should be (and thier responsibilties), leaving the security team in ambiguous states of responsibility - a bad place ot be in a  breach.  Every company today is tehcnolgy driven, and tech adoption and operationalization is often the lynchpin of competitive edge... agile security is hard and can drag the business in it's goals.  

I think there's some organizational coaching work, better leadership around roles and repsonsibilties, and better technical approaches that could change the climate for the security proffessional.
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/13/2020
Omdia Research Launches Page on Dark Reading
Tim Wilson, Editor in Chief, Dark Reading 7/9/2020
Mobile App Fraud Jumped in Q1 as Attackers Pivot from Browsers
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  7/10/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-14174
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-13
Affected versions of Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center allow remote attackers to view titles of a private project via an Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) vulnerability in the Administration Permission Helper. The affected versions are before version 7.13.6, from version 8.0.0 before 8.5....
CVE-2019-20901
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-13
The login.jsp resource in Jira before version 8.5.2, and from version 8.6.0 before version 8.6.1 allows remote attackers to redirect users to a different website which they may use as part of performing a phishing attack via an open redirect in the os_destination parameter.
CVE-2019-20898
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-13
Affected versions of Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center allow remote attackers to access sensitive information without being authenticated in the Global permissions screen. The affected versions are before version 8.8.0.
CVE-2019-20899
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-13
The Gadget API in Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center in affected versions allows remote attackers to make Jira unresponsive via repeated requests to a certain endpoint in the Gadget API. The affected versions are before version 8.5.4, and from version 8.6.0 before 8.6.1.
CVE-2019-20900
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-13
Affected versions of Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTML or JavaScript via a cross site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Add Field module. The affected versions are before version 8.7.0.