Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


08:00 AM
Connect Directly

4 Signs Your Board Thinks Security Readiness Is Better Than It Is

Ponemon Institute survey shows a gap in perception between boards of directors and IT executives when it comes to IT risk posture.

While most boards of directors today consider cybersecurity risks a top concern for the companies they help govern, their true awareness of the threats may not be as good as they think, according to recent results of a Ponemon Institute survey that compared directors' perceptions to IT security executives'. The study showed that there's a gap between how well the boards believe their charges are doing with security and the perception by security personnel in the trenches working to protect company assets. Here are some indications from the survey that boards of directors (BoDs) may underestimate the cybersecurity risks facing their organizations.


Baseline Knowledge Missing

Even though almost three-quarters of directors report that they're charged with overseeing risk assessments and audits at their companies, they may not have the baseline knowledge necessary to really decipher information and capably lead based on these assessments. The survey showed that only 33 percent of board members consider themselves knowledgeable or very knowledgeable about cybersecurity. It's not surprising, then that while 70 percent of board members say they understand the security risks their organizations face, just 43 percent of IT security personnel believe their boards truly understand the cyber risk landscape.


Overconfidence Endemic To Boards

The lack of knowledge allows many directors to maintain somewhat Pollyanna-ish views about their organization's security readiness. Approximately 59 percent of board members rate their cybersecurity governance practices as very effective. At the same time, only 18 percent of security pros also believe this to be true.

"This finding reveals the deep divide in the thinking about what constitutes effective governance practices between board members who are in charge of overall company performance and those responsible for stopping data breaches and cyber attacks," the report said.


BoD Not Informed of Incidents

The disparity between breaches that board members know about versus those that IT security staff have knowledge of hints at a troubling lack of communication between the board and infosec pros.  

Over half of IT security professionals reported that their organizations had experienced a breach involving theft of high-value information in the past two years. That's compared with just 23 percent of board members who believed the same. Furthermore, in many cases, board members are unsure if their organizations have experienced security incidents. About one in five directors say they're uncertain if their organization experienced a cyber attack that disrupted business or IT operations in the past few years and 18 percent said they were unsure if it experienced a breach involved high-value information.


Directors Don't Ask For Security Measurables

While board members recognize the importance of cyber security—89 percent say they recognize the reputational and marketplace impacet breaches or security failures pose—they're not asking for enough information from security departments. In fact, only 19 percent of boards use any kind of cybersecurity metrics to keep IT accountable for maintaining an acceptable level of risk for the organization.

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Apprentice
7/7/2015 | 6:10:54 PM
Comment on the 4 Signs Your Board Thinks Security Readiness Is Better Than It Is
It is not surprising to hear that top management knows little about real security threats and the value of ensuring that you have near to watertight security protocols to protect the future of your corporation. This all stems from the fact that IT governance is not aligned appropriately with corporate strategies. With this gap, there is no way for top management to appreciate the value of providing security to the corporate information. It is also the lack of showing how much the coporation loses due to security breaches. I fail to see a board members underestimating the importance of securing critical information if millions are lost due to security intrusions. A corporate strategy that does not take into account the risk of loss lacks the very fundamentals of appropriate stratgic goal setting and achievement.
User Rank: Ninja
6/30/2015 | 10:05:06 AM
Need for a CISO
This is precisely why organizations need a CISO. An individual who has a hybrid techincal/policy background to be able to delineate the need for pursing certain security endeavors. They will have a seat at the table and be able to display value in the form of metrics. But to truly have security be appreciated at an organization you need someone at the highest levels where its there number 1 priority so that those initiatives trickle down through the organization and are not pushed to the back burner due to lack of authority.
7 Truths About BEC Scams
Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer,  6/13/2019
DNS Firewalls Could Prevent Billions in Losses to Cybercrime
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  6/13/2019
Can Your Patching Strategy Keep Up with the Demands of Open Source?
Tim Mackey, Principal Security Strategist, CyRC, at Synopsys,  6/18/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-20
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Prime Service Catalog Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protection mechanisms on the web-ba...
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-20
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Prime Service Catalog could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the web-based interface. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input by t...
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-20
A vulnerability in the HTTPS proxy feature of Cisco Wide Area Application Services (WAAS) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to use the Central Manager as an HTTPS proxy. The vulnerability is due to insufficient authentication of proxy connection requests. An attacker could exp...
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-20
A vulnerability in the Cisco Discovery Protocol (CDP) implementation for the Cisco TelePresence Codec (TC) and Collaboration Endpoint (CE) Software could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to inject arbitrary shell commands that are executed by the device. The vulnerability is due to insuff...
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-20
A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco Integrated Management Controller (IMC) could allow an authenticated, local attacker to inject arbitrary commands that are executed with root privileges. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input at the CLI. An attacker could exploi...