Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operational Security

5/23/2019
09:55 AM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
50%
50%

Strategic Security Equals Faster Digital Transformation

Survey finds that respondents who adopted a more traditional or reactive approach to their data protection and security program did not believe they would reach their digital transformation goals.

A new survey carried out for Titus by Market Strategies International involved more than 600 IT decision-makers at leading brands across a diverse set of industries in the US, Canada and the UK. It found that respondents who adopted a more traditional or reactive approach to their data protection and security program did not believe they would reach their digital transformation goals.

The report, The Vital Role of Security in Digital Transformation, showed that nine out of ten who said they did hold a strategic approach to security thought their current efforts would address digital transformation needs within five years and, consequently, that their organization would achieve its digital transformation goals in the next five years.

Most of these "strategic" leaning respondents held senior-level titles. Over 50% gave their title as Chief Information Security Officer (CISO).

However, only 50% of those who say that they have adopted a more traditional approach to their security initiatives thought their current efforts would address digital transformation needs in the next five years. Many of this group held more junior titles, but a full third self-identified as a CISO.

The "strategic" camp had a number of other characteristics. They were found by the report to be more likely to say that their company's existing security infrastructure is "up-to-date," with 64% indicating that they were early adopters of new technologies and 60% pursuing best-of-breed security solutions on an ongoing basis.

This greatly contrasts with the fewer than 40% of "non-strategic" respondents that identified themselves as early adopters, as well as the 43% of the same group that described themselves as best-of-breed purchasers.

Three quarters of the strategic security professionals in the survey say that they have strong buy-in from executive leadership on the role of security as a "critical driver" in digital transformation initiatives. But only half of the professionals taking a traditional approach to security could say the same.

The tools used in the initiatives of the two groups were also different. The strategic security professionals reported that there were fewer vendors and fewer products in their security armory. The study showed that more than 80% of the "strategics" worked with ten or fewer security vendors and 70% deployed ten or fewer security solutions.

The more conservative and traditional counterparts had nearly a quarter of them using more than 25 different security solutions.

There were geographical differences as well. Eighty-one percent of North American respondents thought the success of their digital transformation efforts relied heavily on strong IT security and data protection, but only 70% of the UK respondents expressed a similar view.

Some sectors expressed their own views on the overall process. Half of all the financial services respondents viewed security as their biggest obstacle to digital transformation, which was well above the average of other sectors.

Alternatively, retail and professional services respondents were the least concerned in the report about security, which likely contributed to their greater buoyancy about digital transformation.

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/3/2020
Pen Testers Who Got Arrested Doing Their Jobs Tell All
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  8/5/2020
New 'Nanodegree' Program Provides Hands-On Cybersecurity Training
Nicole Ferraro, Contributing Writer,  8/3/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-16248
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-09
** DISPUTED ** Prometheus Blackbox Exporter through 0.17.0 allows /probe?target= SSRF. NOTE: follow-on discussion suggests that this might plausibly be interpreted as both intended functionality and also a vulnerability.
CVE-2020-15820
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-08
In JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.2.6881, the markdown parser could disclose hidden file existence.
CVE-2020-15821
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-08
In JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.2.6881, a user without permission is able to create an article draft.
CVE-2020-15823
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-08
JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.2.8873 is vulnerable to SSRF in the Workflow component.
CVE-2020-15824
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-08
In JetBrains Kotlin before 1.4.0, there is a script-cache privilege escalation vulnerability due to kotlin-main-kts cached scripts in the system temp directory, which is shared by all users by default.