Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operational Security

12/18/2017
11:20 AM
Curtis Franklin
Curtis Franklin
Curt Franklin
50%
50%

Security for the Broken Business

What is the IT security's responsibility when the business itself is intrinsically secure? The first step may be to point out the obvious.

IT security professionals have recently been talking about the importance of having "a seat at the table," that is, a voice in the corporate decision-making process. I've begun to doubt whether those professionals, or any other members of corporate management, fully appreciate what that seat could mean.

As a discipline, security is about protecting assets of every sort from dangers of every type. But what if... what if a portion of the organization -- or the organization itself, cannot be protected? What is security's responsibility then?

I was thinking about this recently as I listened to men, even older than myself, talking about the memories of a war long ended. As they discussed battles and action I was reminded of what little military strategy I've been taught. In strategy, positions and how to defend them are often discussed. In those discussions the hard truth is laid out: Some positions can't be defended.

Through geography or materiel, human resources or munitions, circumstances conspire to make certain positions so vulnerable to attack that there is no workable defense. And in those circumstances there's really only one option. Do not, under any circumstances, allow yourself to be caught in that position.

In business we like to believe that we're smart enough and the tools we wield so powerful that any position -- and circumstance -- can be successfully defended. It can be defended if only we apply enough discipline, intelligence, knowledge and technology. But it's possible that we're wrong.

Let's take a famous example, that of Equifax. Tens of thousands of words have been written looking for "what went wrong" at Equifax. Certainly there were mistakes and errors of process, procedure and action, but it's possible that that data would have been compromised at Equifax (or one of its competitors) even if those mistakes had not been made. Why? Because of the indefensible position.

The business in which Equifax finds itself requires vast stores of sensitive, personally identifiable information. Data comes into the system in huge streams and must be accessible, via applications and various products, to customers on a constant basis. It is possible that the business requirements (as the business currently exists) is impossible to truly secure. Today's question is whether there exists a CISO who could rise from their "seat at the table" and question the basic premise of the business.

I chose Equifax (and, by extension, the whole credit reporting industry) because it's very visible and has become hugely important. It's not alone in having some basic qualities that may make it impossible to protect. There are other important industries that share many of the same qualities and it's reasonable to ask whether those businesses are so important that any security breaches must be considered a reasonable cost of doing business.

If security is to take its place around the table in the executive suite then security leaders must be ready to talk about the most basic business issues. One of those issues has to be whether the organization has occupied an indefensible position -- and if it has, what to do about the horde rapidly advancing on all fronts.

Related posts:

— Curtis Franklin is the editor of SecurityNow.com. Follow him on Twitter @kg4gwa.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/10/2020
Researcher Finds New Office Macro Attacks for MacOS
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  8/7/2020
Digital Clones Could Cause Problems for Identity Systems
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  8/8/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-8913
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-12
A local, arbitrary code execution vulnerability exists in the SplitCompat.install endpoint in Android's Play Core Library versions prior to 1.7.2. A malicious attacker could create an apk which targets a specific application, and if a victim were to install this apk, the attacker could perform a dir...
CVE-2020-7029
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-11
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was discovered in the System Management Interface Web component of Avaya Aura Communication Manager and Avaya Aura Messaging. This vulnerability could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to perform Web administration actions with the privileged ...
CVE-2020-17489
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-11
An issue was discovered in certain configurations of GNOME gnome-shell through 3.36.4. When logging out of an account, the password box from the login dialog reappears with the password still visible. If the user had decided to have the password shown in cleartext at login time, it is then visible f...
CVE-2020-17495
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-11
django-celery-results through 1.2.1 stores task results in the database. Among the data it stores are the variables passed into the tasks. The variables may contain sensitive cleartext information that does not belong unencrypted in the database.
CVE-2020-0260
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-11
There is a possible out of bounds read due to an incorrect bounds check.Product: AndroidVersions: Android SoCAndroid ID: A-152225183