Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operational Security //

Compliance

2/26/2018
08:05 AM
Dawn Kawamoto
Dawn Kawamoto
Dawn Kawamoto
50%
50%

GDPR Non-Compliance: Will Your Enterprise Get Busted?

GDPR enforcement begins May 25 and regulators are likely to focus on particular industries and types of companies, according to attorneys and analysts.

With the deadline for General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) compliance fast approaching, US companies may be surprised to find that some organizations may face greater regulatory scrutiny than others.

Supervisory Authorities for each of the 28 European Union member states will be responsible for investigating and enforcing GDPR violations and compliance, according to cybersecurity audit and advisory firm Sera-Brynn. Come May 25, companies that have not taken the necessary steps to safeguard personally identifiable information of European Union citizens under the GDPR may face fines up to 4% of their company's annual revenues.

Data breaches that reveal thousands of users' personally identifiable information will likely draw the attention of supervisory authorities, but so will the type of industry and size of the company, say security and compliance analysts and attorneys.

Dissecting the sectors
Healthcare companies and organizations that deal with background checks are some of the industry sectors regulators will likely focus on, given the highly sensitive data that they access and process, Jim Halpert, partner and co-chair of global data protection, privacy and security practice for law firm DLA Piper, told Security Now.

He pointed to France and how regulators there have already publicly announced certain sectors they plan to focus on for potential GDPR investigations in the beginning of the year, such as the healthcare industry and online advertising industry.

Enza Iannopollo, a security and risk analyst for Forrester Research, agrees that some sectors will be targeted by regulators more than others.

"If you handle a large quantity of users' sensitive data, such as the financial industry or healthcare industry, then you'll likely be a target," Iannopollo told Security Now. "Although it goes to the sensitivity of the data, at the end of the day, it comes down to how well did you handle sensitive data."

Big companies vs. SMBs
EU regulators will generally go after large companies for GDPR violations, in part to make an example of them and also to collect higher enforcement fees, Halpert predicts.

Iannopollo agrees that while regulators may turn to large companies to make an example of GDPR enforcement, it has been the small and midsized companies that have been dinged more frequently for privacy violations and fines under Europe's existing data protection laws.

"There will be nothing different with GDPR except under this regulation you do not have to have a physical presence in Europe," she said.

Rick Hemsley, managing director of Accenture Security, told Security Now that the UK's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has noted they are going to provide more support to small businesses, so he doubts SMBs will be targeted for GDPR investigations.

And as for fines against companies that have failed to comply with the GDPR, Hemsley makes this prediction: "The big numbers associated with GDPR, 2% to 4% [of revenue], will only be enforced if there is significant or gross-negligence type of breaches."

He added there is nothing to suggest that companies that repeatedly fall out of GDPR compliance will face a progressively larger fine, adding, it is unlikely a "three-strikes" and you are out type of rule will be imposed.

Related posts:

— Dawn Kawamoto is an award-winning technology and business journalist, whose work has appeared in CNET's News.com, Dark Reading, TheStreet.com, AOL's DailyFinance, and The Motley Fool.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/3/2020
'BootHole' Vulnerability Exposes Secure Boot Devices to Attack
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/29/2020
Average Cost of a Data Breach: $3.86 Million
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  7/29/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-18112
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
Affected versions of Atlassian Fisheye allow remote attackers to view the HTTP password of a repository via an Information Disclosure vulnerability in the logging feature. The affected versions are before version 4.8.3.
CVE-2020-15109
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
In solidus before versions 2.8.6, 2.9.6, and 2.10.2, there is an bility to change order address without triggering address validations. This vulnerability allows a malicious customer to craft request data with parameters that allow changing the address of the current order without changing the shipm...
CVE-2020-16847
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
Extreme Analytics in Extreme Management Center before 8.5.0.169 allows unauthenticated reflected XSS via a parameter in a GET request, aka CFD-4887.
CVE-2020-15135
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
save-server (npm package) before version 1.05 is affected by a CSRF vulnerability, as there is no CSRF mitigation (Tokens etc.). The fix introduced in version version 1.05 unintentionally breaks uploading so version v1.0.7 is the fixed version. This is patched by implementing Double submit. The CSRF...
CVE-2020-13522
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
An exploitable arbitrary file delete vulnerability exists in SoftPerfect RAM Disk 4.1 spvve.sys driver. A specially crafted I/O request packet (IRP) can allow an unprivileged user to delete any file on the filesystem. An attacker can send a malicious IRP to trigger this vulnerability.