Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operational Security //

AI

4/2/2018
09:35 AM
Simon Marshall
Simon Marshall
Simon Marshall
50%
50%

Red Bull Powers Security Strategy With AI, Automation

When it comes to security, Red Bull is looking to close the gap by turning toward newer technologies, including automation, AI and machine learning.

Red Bull is well-known for projecting an energetic brand. Behind the scenes, its IT security team also likes to be energetic, however, not in the way the company's commercials would have you believe.

Despite the play-hard image of the brand, the Red Bull team likes to be very Zen. About a year ago, it began investing in automating some of its security processes, so the organization could free-up detection and response resources to become higher value, less tactical brains.

At times, an enterprise security strategy can be dangerous when it gets overly defensive. However, when security teams want to be strategic, as Red Bull has shown, automation technology can actually help the security team think, and not just act. (See Unknown Document 736875)

"We don't want to lose the right focus or become over-protective," Jimmy Heschl, Red Bull's CISO, told Security Now, explaining how sometimes reacting to and resolving an incident can be a mistake. Even reacting and remediating correctly, shouldn't ideally -- in his world -- be done manually because it's at the cost of contending against hackers who have time on their hands and are very inventive.

"Overwhelming or excessively intrusive security controls are significant roadblocks, when [we] want to be creative, spontaneous and innovative," Heschl said. "Overreaction from security -- as this is done by colleagues that are primarily driven by various compliance requirements -- has a significant impact on these objectives."

Advent of security automation
A number of tech vendors including Demisto, IBM's Resilient Systems, Microsoft's Hexadite, and Red Bull's vendor, EnSilo, are capturing the mood with orchestration and automation offerings, powered by artificial intelligence, and more specifically, machine learning. (See Automation Answers Security Skills Shortage.)

Gartner's 2017 "Innovation Insight for Security Orchestration, Automation and Response" report finds enterprises hobbled because of analyst time lost to manual, heavy-lift processes.

"Security operations still primarily rely on manually created and maintained, document-based procedures for operations, which leads to issues such as longer analyst onboarding times, stale procedures, tribal knowledge and inconsistencies in executing operational functions," according to the report.

Increasingly, the engine behind endpoint detection and response (EDR) system automation is AI and machine learning. These technologies are in the hype curve and for some organizations, offer not only to automate manual work, but to actively couple learned threat knowledge with their own business security policies and then independently remediate attacks.

But a lack of human intervention, on the other hand, worries Red Bull, for one.

"Automated response is a challenge in itself," Heschl said. "It has to do with giving away control, and automation always has some drawbacks. It's not the detection function that I fear, but automated response from simple mail filters and network blocks; via user and access management to advanced countermeasures: the more complexity you have in response, the more that can go wrong."

The cost of dwell time
The elapsed time between threat detection and response -- dwell time -- is what costs enterprises money in terms of increased risk of data theft or damage, and the price of running through investigation and remediation processes that usually take months.

A 2017 study by the Ponemon Institute of 419 companies, entitled "The Cost of Data Breach," reported that the time to identify and the time to contain malicious attacks were an average 214 and 77 days respectively. The average cost per breach is currently about $4 million.


Want to hear more about the leading operator use cases for AI technologies? Join us in Austin from May 14-16 at the fifth-annual Big Communications Event. There's still time to register and communications service providers get in free!

Although a current drive towards zero dwell time is noble, it's a massive challenge. Fortunately, a more realistic return on investment in automated EDR is already benefiting Red Bull.

"It's the speed of initiating action [that's important]," Heschl said. "On the other side, it's the automation of response that leaves [us] independent of scarce resources.

"It helps me address my big fear: losing focus. My team can use their time to think and to improve rather than hunt adversaries," Heschl added.

Although it's the computing and learning crunch power that AI and machine learning that support this drive, despite the hype, the technology itself is relatively unimportant.

"I believe that machine learning and AI are the means to meet and achieve security initiatives," EnSilo CEO Roy Katmor said. "[But] organizations believe in added value -- namely alert efficacy, in pre- and post-infection, and operational efficiency via automation. The technology behind it is less relevant."

Related posts:

— Simon Marshall, Technology Journalist, special to Security Now

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/3/2020
'BootHole' Vulnerability Exposes Secure Boot Devices to Attack
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/29/2020
Average Cost of a Data Breach: $3.86 Million
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  7/29/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-18112
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
Affected versions of Atlassian Fisheye allow remote attackers to view the HTTP password of a repository via an Information Disclosure vulnerability in the logging feature. The affected versions are before version 4.8.3.
CVE-2020-15109
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
In solidus before versions 2.8.6, 2.9.6, and 2.10.2, there is an bility to change order address without triggering address validations. This vulnerability allows a malicious customer to craft request data with parameters that allow changing the address of the current order without changing the shipm...
CVE-2020-16847
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
Extreme Analytics in Extreme Management Center before 8.5.0.169 allows unauthenticated reflected XSS via a parameter in a GET request, aka CFD-4887.
CVE-2020-15135
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
save-server (npm package) before version 1.05 is affected by a CSRF vulnerability, as there is no CSRF mitigation (Tokens etc.). The fix introduced in version version 1.05 unintentionally breaks uploading so version v1.0.7 is the fixed version. This is patched by implementing Double submit. The CSRF...
CVE-2020-13522
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
An exploitable arbitrary file delete vulnerability exists in SoftPerfect RAM Disk 4.1 spvve.sys driver. A specially crafted I/O request packet (IRP) can allow an unprivileged user to delete any file on the filesystem. An attacker can send a malicious IRP to trigger this vulnerability.