Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operational Security //

AI

2/11/2019
09:40 AM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
50%
50%

AI & 'Fuzzing' Combination Empowers APT

When the bad guys add AI and 'fuzzing' to their armory, the advanced persistent threat gets, erm, even more threatening.

Zero-day vulnerabilities -- those flaws that are unknown to those who may be interested in mitigating the vulnerability -- have lately shown an increased presence in the security landscape.

Apple just patched two of them in an iOS update. Adobe's products have a long history of these kinds of vulnerabilities, as does Microsoft Windows.

These kinds of vulnerabilities emerge when some threat actor uses them in mounting an exploit which takes advantage of them. That's the point when it shows up on the security radar.

The method by which these vulnerabilities are discovered by a threat actor can be opaque. Reverse engineering has shown to be one of the most currently productive techniques for cybercriminals looking for holes in the security fence.

But this way of doing things is labor-intensive. It seems likely that criminals are going to be seeking other more productive techniques in the future to give them exploitable information.

The use of artificial intelligence along with machine learning could drastically increase the speed of finding chinks in the security armor of a program. Presently, a kind of analysis called "fuzzing" is also used by threat actors to find exploitable situations in code. This sort of analysis is not as widely used as other techniques, since it requires expertise in order for it to be effective.

But what will happen when the process is augmented by AI tools?

The fuzzing technique focuses a software tool so that it will by automated means inject invalid, unexpected, or semi-random data into the user-facing frontend of a program. The resulting output is monitored for unexpected outcomes like crashes, failing code assertions and memory leaks.

Fuzzing correlates unexpected and exploitable outcomes with certain kinds of inputs. That is just what someone looking to bust open software is looking for.

Now, if you put AI into the process -- especially one that can learn from its mistakes when doing it -- you will make the fuzzing process more efficient. It will not need as much human input or oversight as current techniques. Which can make threat actors more dangerous as they become more efficient at finding weaknesses.

There are counter efforts underway using fuzzing for proactively finding program faults before they can be exploited by others as a zero-day. Microsoft has already begun work on such efforts from a defensive, rather then attack, position.

Its latest research on neural fuzzing is bearing some promising results. It is able to learn from previously performed fuzzing, which is a hallmark of AI techniques.

Their AI prototype was found vulnerabilities that un-enhanced fuzzing missed, so it seems that the approach is practical and effective.

The enterprise will need these kinds of enhanced fuzzing tools to counteract those that attackers will develop. By understanding what these tools can reveal about software, a company can proactively defend against their use and hopefully avoid vulnerabilities that show up as zero-day exploits.

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/2/2020
Ripple20 Threatens Increasingly Connected Medical Devices
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/30/2020
DDoS Attacks Jump 542% from Q4 2019 to Q1 2020
Dark Reading Staff 6/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-9498
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
Apache Guacamole 1.1.0 and older may mishandle pointers involved inprocessing data received via RDP static virtual channels. If a userconnects to a malicious or compromised RDP server, a series ofspecially-crafted PDUs could result in memory corruption, possiblyallowing arbitrary code to be executed...
CVE-2020-3282
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager, Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition, Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM & Presence Service, and Cisco Unity Connection could allow an unauthenticated, remote attack...
CVE-2020-5909
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, when users run the command displayed in NGINX Controller user interface (UI) to fetch the agent installer, the server TLS certificate is not verified.
CVE-2020-5910
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, the Neural Autonomic Transport System (NATS) messaging services in use by the NGINX Controller do not require any form of authentication, so any successful connection would be authorized.
CVE-2020-5911
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, the NGINX Controller installer starts the download of Kubernetes packages from an HTTP URL On Debian/Ubuntu system.