Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Analytics

Obstacles Nick NAC, But Growth Continues

Most companies are getting network access control, but cost and lack of integration still are pain points

The vast majority of companies are deploying network access control (NAC) technology as a means of securing their endpoints -- but they aren't all happy about it.

That's the gist of a new survey, conducted by Applied Research West, which was published earlier today by Symantec.

In interviews with 300 security pros at the recent InfoSecurity 2007 conference in New York, Applied Research found that nearly 70 percent of companies surveyed have already implemented NAC products or plan to do so in the next 12 months.

NAC, which is offered by virtually all the major security tool vendors, including Cisco and Microsoft, has often been ballyhooed as the answer to the question of how to secure desktops, laptops, and mobile endpoints. But a diversity of products and confusion about the technology's capabilities have slowed deployment. (See NAC: Can't Get No Satisfaction.)

Interestingly, 86 percent of the survey respondents who had deployed NAC said they had "no problems" deploying NAC and that everything went smoothly. But the question allowed users to have multiple responses, and 21 percent said they had difficulty integrating NAC with other security hardware and software. Eighteen percent said NAC used too many resources, including people, equipment, and time, and 16 percent complained about the lack of industry standards.

More than 30 percent of respondents said they have no plans to deploy NAC within the next 12 months. Of those respondents, 35 percent said the technology is too costly; 27 percent said NAC is not interoperable with their current infrastructure or operating systems; 20 said it is "too disruptive" to implement.

Many of the security pros complained about NAC's interoperability issues. Fifty-four percent of respondents said they would prefer to buy all-in-one products from a single vendor, rather than multiple products from multiple vendors. Sixty-one percent say they believe vendors should adopt standards for NAC.

In its early phases, NAC was promoted as a means of safely connecting guests and mobile users to the corporate network. So far, however, only 27 percent of users say they are using NAC for guest access. Eighty percent of enterprises that have deployed NAC say they did it to prevent unauthorized users from entering their networks. Sixty-six percent say they did it to protect critical business assets and prevent data loss.

Similarly, early discussions of NAC focused on policy enforcement at the endpoint, forcing users to meet specific security requirements before allowing them onto the network. But 63 percent now say they prefer NAC enforcement to take place within the network, using existing network security features, rather than at the endpoint.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Data Leak Week: Billions of Sensitive Files Exposed Online
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  12/10/2019
Lessons from the NSA: Know Your Assets
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  12/12/2019
4 Tips to Run Fast in the Face of Digital Transformation
Shane Buckley, President & Chief Operating Officer, Gigamon,  12/9/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19807
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-15
In the Linux kernel before 5.3.11, sound/core/timer.c has a use-after-free caused by erroneous code refactoring, aka CID-e7af6307a8a5. This is related to snd_timer_open and snd_timer_close_locked. The timeri variable was originally intended to be for a newly created timer instance, but was used for ...
CVE-2014-8650
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-15
python-requests-Kerberos through 0.5 does not handle mutual authentication
CVE-2014-3536
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-15
CFME (CloudForms Management Engine) 5: RHN account information is logged to top_output.log during registration
CVE-2014-3643
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-15
jersey: XXE via parameter entities not disabled by the jersey SAX parser
CVE-2014-3652
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-15
JBoss KeyCloak: Open redirect vulnerability via failure to validate the redirect URL.