Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Network Security

12/11/2019
09:40 AM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
50%
50%

Snatch Is Both Novel & Evil

The Sophos Managed Threat Response team found out that, where the Snatch ransomware is concerned, things just more ugly.

The Sophos Managed Threat Response (MTR) team and SophosLabs researchers have been investigating an ongoing ransomware campaign from Russian threat actors called Snatch for about a year. It was highly targeted to high-payout victims, and seemed the work of financially oriented attackers.

But things just got uglier recently. Sophos realized that the malware had changed how it was doing things.\r\nThe victim’s PC was being rebooted into the Safe Mode of Windows before the encryption of data files was being done. It is both a novel and evil technique, as Andrew Brandt (the author of the Sophos blog report) said on Twitter.

Running the encryption in Safe Mode means that endpoint protection software that may be present will not operate. Even AV software is cut off. The victim’s defensive line is totally swamped by this method.

Fortunately Snatch is not multi-platform, even though it was coded in Go, Google’s multi-platform coding language. Sophos says that, “the malware we’ve observed isn’t capable of running on platforms other than Windows. Snatch can run on most common versions of Windows, from 7 through 10, in 32- and 64-bit versions.”

Sophos thinks that Snatch’s operators have adopted the “active automated attack” model, in which they seek to penetrate enterprise networks via automated brute-force attacks against vulnerable, exposed services, and then leverage that foothold to spread internally within the targeted organization’s network through human-directed action.

They got the needed partners by advertising on criminal message boards. Sophos found one of the “Snatch Team” posting a quite explicit ad saying they were “Looking for affiliate partners with access to RDP\VNC\TeamViewer\WebShell\SQL inj [SQL injection] in corporate networks, stores and other companies.”

Sophos found that in one case, attackers initially accessed the company’s internal network by brute-forcing the password to an administrator’s account on a Microsoft Azure server, and were able to log in to the server using Remote Desktop (RDP). They could then conduct surveillance of the network which lasted weeks.

The ransomware installs itself as a Windows service called SuperBackupMan, which has properties that prevent it from being stopped or paused by the user while it’s running. The malware then adds this key to the Windows registry so it will start up during a Safe Mode boot.

Using the BCDEDIT tool on Windows, it issues a command that sets up Windows in Safe Mode, and then immediately forces a reboot of the infected computer.

Sophos recommends that “organizations of any size refrain from exposing the Remote Desktop interface to the unprotected internet. Organizations that wish to permit remote access to machines should put them behind a VPN on their network.”

They also say that organizations should immediately implement multi-factor authentication for users with administrative privileges, to make it more difficult for attackers to brute force those account credentials.

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Enterprise Cybersecurity Plans in a Post-Pandemic World
Download the Enterprise Cybersecurity Plans in a Post-Pandemic World report to understand how security leaders are maintaining pace with pandemic-related challenges, and where there is room for improvement.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-41393
PUBLISHED: 2021-09-18
Teleport before 4.4.11, 5.x before 5.2.4, 6.x before 6.2.12, and 7.x before 7.1.1 allows forgery of SSH host certificates in some situations.
CVE-2021-41394
PUBLISHED: 2021-09-18
Teleport before 4.4.11, 5.x before 5.2.4, 6.x before 6.2.12, and 7.x before 7.1.1 allows alteration of build artifacts in some situations.
CVE-2021-41395
PUBLISHED: 2021-09-18
Teleport before 6.2.12 and 7.x before 7.1.1 allows attackers to control a database connection string, in some situations, via a crafted database name or username.
CVE-2021-3806
PUBLISHED: 2021-09-18
A path traversal vulnerability on Pardus Software Center's "extractArchive" function could allow anyone on the same network to do a man-in-the-middle and write files on the system.
CVE-2021-41392
PUBLISHED: 2021-09-17
static/main-preload.js in Boost Note through 0.22.0 allows remote command execution. A remote attacker may send a crafted IPC message to the exposed vulnerable ipcRenderer IPC interface, which invokes the dangerous openExternal Electron API.