Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Network Security

8/11/2017
06:50 PM
Curtis Franklin
Curtis Franklin
Curt Franklin
50%
50%

Obscurity Hampers Security: The Latest Survey

Lack of visibility is the number one obstacle to security, according to a new study released this week.

"Security through obscurity" says that you can't attack what you can't see. In far too many cases, though, it's the defenders who are flying blind when it comes to the configuration and status of their own network. "Visibility" was one of the five words that defined this year's Black Hat conference, and its importance to security professionals is amplified in the results of the Vanson Bourne survey sponsored by Gigamon.

In the report on the survey results, Vanson Bourne notes that more than two thirds of those responding noted that they have a lack of visibility into all aspects of their IT operation. Around half of those responding that they have a lack of visibility noted that the blind spots represent an active hurdle to good security in their network.

Where is all this hidden data? Are there vast distributed networks of virtual nooks and crannies just waiting for unsuspecting data to fall in? According to those taking the survey, some of the data gets lost in the data gyre that exists between the network operations center and security operations center, while the rest is hidden between and amongst the various cloud services that make up the modern hybrid IT architecture.

When you add to this the security difficulties that can arise when organizations take expert advice and encrypt data both in motion and at rest, you quickly find situation in which administrators have an out-of-date image of the network infrastructure and very little insight into the contents of all the packets flowing back and forth between their mysterious IT boxes.


You're invited to attend Light Reading's Virtualizing the Cable Architecture event – a free breakfast panel at SCTE/ISBE's Cable-Tec Expo on October 18 featuring Comcast's Rob Howald and Charter's John Dickinson.

As if all this wasn't complication enough, in many organizations there is confusion over which organization has responsibility for security planning an operations. According to the report,

In general, it would appear that the SecurityOps (69%) team is accountable for cloud security in respondents' organizations. However, in around half of organizations, CloudOps (54%) and NetworkOps (47%) are also involved.
When looked at in conjunction with the fact that over a third (36%) of respondents believe that there is confusion within their organization over which team owns the cloud security problem, potential problems begin to arise.

So how should organizations begin to resolve the issues that come with lack of visibility and a clear security management structure? Though it seems obvious, the answers are relatively straightforward. First, develop a clear chain of command and control when it comes to security functions. While cloud and network operations should legitimately be involved in security roles, there should be no confusion about the group that is charged with planning security and coordinating the security operations of all teams.

Next, visibility into the architecture of the network as it currently exists should be a top priority. Invest in the tools and processes required to give security professionals access to the existing network configuration and the contents of the traffic flowing through that network. Only then can you begin to see real results in your security operations.

Related posts:

— Curtis Franklin is the editor of SecurityNow.com. Follow him on Twitter @kg4gwa.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/3/2020
Pen Testers Who Got Arrested Doing Their Jobs Tell All
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  8/5/2020
Researcher Finds New Office Macro Attacks for MacOS
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  8/7/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-12777
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-10
A function in Combodo iTop contains a vulnerability of Broken Access Control, which allows unauthorized attacker to inject command and disclose system information.
CVE-2020-12778
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-10
Combodo iTop does not validate inputted parameters, attackers can inject malicious commands and launch XSS attack.
CVE-2020-12779
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-10
Combodo iTop contains a stored Cross-site Scripting vulnerability, which can be attacked by uploading file with malicious script.
CVE-2020-12780
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-10
A security misconfiguration exists in Combodo iTop, which can expose sensitive information.
CVE-2020-12781
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-10
Combodo iTop contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability, attackers can execute specific commands via malicious site request forgery.