Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Network Security

10/17/2017
04:11 PM
Curtis Franklin
Curtis Franklin
Curt Franklin
50%
50%

KRACK Attack: How Enterprises Can Protect Their WiFi

A flaw in the WPA2 protocol means that most WiFi networks worldwide are open to successful attack.

By this time you've probably heard about the KRACK attack, and what you've heard is right. This one is bad, and it's everywhere.

The name is an acronym taken from key reinstallation attacks, the technique used to take advantage of a vulnerability that exists in pretty much every WiFi access point in use today. The reason it's so widespread is that the vulnerability in the way WPA2 (WiFi Protected Access II) is implemented in the WiFi protocol.

Here, in a nutshell is the problem: In WPA2 there's a shared secret (the password) that a device and the access point use to begin the process, and then a single-use string (or "nonce") that is shared to actually encrypt the conversation. This happens in a process known as a four-way handshake. The vulnerability is in step three of the four-way handshake, when an attacker can force the access point to re-use a previous nonce -- a nonce that the attacker has.

Once the bogus nonce is in use, the attacker can decrypt the entire session and steal any information passing over the network. Now, if this is happening on a public network where employees have already been trained to use a VPN, then there's no real problem since sensitive traffic will travel within an ecnrypted tunnel and the encryption used by SSL and most other VPNs isn't affected by the vulnerability.

The issue is with corporate WiFi networks (and home networks where the employee has implemented WPA2) in which people have been trained to think of traffic as secure, and VPNs as unnecessary. There are few situations more dangerous than one in which people think they're far more secure than they actually are -- and this KRACK attack combines that with near ubiquity.

If there's good news to be found in all this, it's that there haven't been any attacks based on this technique identified in the wild. The news gets a little better with both Microsoft and Apple announcing that they have patches either released or in beta for their desktop and mobile operating systems (though there hasn't been any news, yet, about Apple patching the software for their Airport WiFi access points).

US-CERT has a vulnerability note on the WPA2 vulnerability and they've thoughtfully included a list of vendors affected by the problem.

So what is an enterprise to do? First, at least temporarily amend your WiFi use rules to include VPN use at all times -- even when connected to wireless networks inside the perimeter. Next, stay on top of your vendors for patches to device and access point software. Some have suggested that companies use this episode as a pass/fail test for vendors: If they don't patch vulnerable systems, and soon, then replace them with vendors that pay more attention to security.

How is your organization reponsing to KRACK? We would like to hear your stories -- let us know in the comment section, below.

Related posts:

— Curtis Franklin is the editor of SecurityNow.com. Follow him on Twitter @kg4gwa.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/21/2020
Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-25596
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. x86 PV guest kernels can experience denial of service via SYSENTER. The SYSENTER instruction leaves various state sanitization activities to software. One of Xen's sanitization paths injects a #GP fault, and incorrectly delivers it twice to the guest. T...
CVE-2020-25597
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. There is mishandling of the constraint that once-valid event channels may not turn invalid. Logic in the handling of event channel operations in Xen assumes that an event channel, once valid, will not become invalid over the life time of a guest. Howeve...
CVE-2020-25598
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
An issue was discovered in Xen 4.14.x. There is a missing unlock in the XENMEM_acquire_resource error path. The RCU (Read, Copy, Update) mechanism is a synchronisation primitive. A buggy error path in the XENMEM_acquire_resource exits without releasing an RCU reference, which is conceptually similar...
CVE-2020-25599
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. There are evtchn_reset() race conditions. Uses of EVTCHNOP_reset (potentially by a guest on itself) or XEN_DOMCTL_soft_reset (by itself covered by XSA-77) can lead to the violation of various internal assumptions. This may lead to out of bounds memory a...
CVE-2020-25600
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. Out of bounds event channels are available to 32-bit x86 domains. The so called 2-level event channel model imposes different limits on the number of usable event channels for 32-bit x86 domains vs 64-bit or Arm (either bitness) ones. 32-bit x86 domains...