Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Network Security //

Data Center

12/12/2018
07:00 AM
Scott Ferguson
Scott Ferguson
News Analysis-Security Now
50%
50%

Supermicro: Report Clears Company of Hacking Allegations

Following a Bloomberg report that found hackers implanted specialized chips in its motherboards, Supermicro claims an audit has cleared the company of wrongdoing.

In an attempt to clear the company name, Supermicro released the results of an audit that showed hackers did not compromise the firm's hardware by implanting highly specialized chips that would lead to large-scale industrial espionage.

In a December 11 letter sent to customers, CEO Charles Liang and David Weigand, the chief compliance officer, wrote that after articles appeared in Bloomberg, the company contacted a third party to investigate the allegations in the report. Ever since the story broke, Supermicro has denied the charges, and the analysis looks to bolster those claims.

"A representative sample of our motherboards was tested, including the specific type of motherboard depicted in the article and motherboards purchased by companies referenced in the article, as well as more recently manufactured motherboards," according to the letter published Tuesday. "Today, we want to share with you the results of this testing: After a thorough examination and a range of functional tests, the investigations firm found absolutely no evidence of malicious hardware on our motherboards."

A Supermicro board\r\n(Source: Wikipedia)
A Supermicro board
\r\n(Source: Wikipedia)

In October, Bloomberg report that a group of hackers infiltrated Supermicro's supply chain and managed to implant tiny microprocessors on the company's motherboards, which were then installed in servers and shipped to customers such as Apple and Amazon Web Services. (See China Hacks Hardware in Spying Attempt on Apple, Amazon & Others Report.)

This type of hardware hack is nearly impossible to pull off, which led to speculation that a specialized unit within China's People's Liberation Army pulled off the feat.

Almost immediately, the report drew criticism from Apple, AWS, Supermicro and other companies, as well as the US government. (See Bloomberg Hardware Hacking Story Faces Fierce Backlash From Apple & DHS.)

Bloomberg has stood by its reporting.

In an email, Patrick Moorhead, president and principal analyst with Moor Insights & Strategy, noted that, so far, no solid evidence has surfaced that confirms the hardware hacking allegations.

"What was laid out in the Bloomberg article certainly is plausible in theory, but without any of the so-called 'spy chips,' the story has zero merit with me," Moorhead told Security Now. "It's like having a hold up at a bank and no one has any evidence of guns or even any damage being done or anything stolen. This story should be retracted."

While the third-party that did the investigation was not named in the letter, Reuters reported that Nardello & Co conducted the review.

In the letter, the executives note that the complexity of the Supermicro's motherboard designs make it difficult or impossible for someone to tamper with the hardware. Also, the company's notes that no single employee or outside contractor is given unrestricted access to the board designs.

Related posts:

— Scott Ferguson is the managing editor of Light Reading and the editor of Security Now. Follow him on Twitter @sferguson_LR.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Concerns over supply chain vulnerabilities and attack visibility drove some significant changes in enterprise cybersecurity strategies over the past year. Dark Reading's 2021 Strategic Security Survey showed that many organizations are staying the course regarding the use of a mix of attack prevention and threat detection technologies and practices for dealing with cyber threats.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-42556
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-22
Rasa X before 0.42.4 allows Directory Traversal during archive extraction. In the functionality that allows a user to load a trained model archive, an attacker has arbitrary write capability within specific directories via a crafted archive file.
CVE-2021-42840
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-22
SuiteCRM before 7.11.19 allows remote code execution via the system settings Log File Name setting. In certain circumstances involving admin account takeover, logger_file_name can refer to an attacker-controlled PHP file under the web root, because only the all-lowercase PHP file extensions were blo...
CVE-2021-29835
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-22
IBM Business Automation Workflow 18.0, 19.0, 20.0, and 21.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X...
CVE-2021-41171
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-22
eLabFTW is an open source electronic lab notebook manager for research teams. In versions of eLabFTW before 4.1.0, it allows attackers to bypass a brute-force protection mechanism by using many different forged PHPSESSID values in HTTP Cookie header. This issue has been addressed by implementing bru...
CVE-2021-42836
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-22
GJSON before 1.9.3 allows a ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) attack.