Mobile

11/17/2017
11:20 AM
50%
50%

Mobile Malware Incidents Hit 100% of Businesses

Attempted malware infections against BYOD and corporate mobile devices are expected to continue to grow, new data shows.

Every business with BYOD and corporate mobile device users across the globe has been exposed to mobile malware, with an average of 54 attempts per company played out within a 12-month period, according to a Check Point report released today.

The study, based on data collected from Check Point SandBlast Mobile deployments at 850 organizations, is the latest sign of growth in mobile malware incidents.

"100% of businesses [facing an attempted attack] was not surprising because the statistics from a year or two ago started to show it was going this way," says Michael Shaulov, head of Check Point's product management for mobile and cloud security. "But the average of 54 [attempts] was surprising. I was expecting two, three, or four."

The report also notes that 94% of security professionals anticipate actual mobile malware attacks to continue to increase, with nearly 66% doubting they can prevent them. 

"We've seen a steady parade of malware specimens over the last several years," says James Plouffe, lead solutions architect at MobileIron. He notes although the 100% mobile malware figure seems high at first blush, it is important to distinguish between organizations that have been exposed to malware versus actually getting infected.

Patrick Hevesi, a Gartner analyst, anticipates a continued rise in mobile malware incidents and breaches. "There are billions of mobile devices for the attackers to try and gain access and some form of monetary gain," he says. "I feel as more and more people continue to make phones and tablets their primary device, the attacks will continue to grow."

Attack Drivers

Most of the malware that BYOD and corporate devices encounter comes from apps at third-party stores, Shaulov says.

Other forms of malicious activity against these devices are also taking place with great frequency. The report reveals 89% of organizations experience a least one man-in-the-middle incident stemming from users connecting to a risky WiFi network. "Attackers are trying to get access to the data transmitted, rather than inject malware," Shaulov says.

Phil Hochmuth, an IDC analyst, says BYOD devices are usually more susceptible to attack than corporate devices because they are not managed by such security measures as an enterprise mobility management platform or mobile threat management platform. These platforms can restrict some of the more liberal permissions and user settings on BYOD devices, he adds.

"We've seen mobile threats become more elaborate and go beyond malware or bad apps," says Hochmuth. "They use a mix of network-based attacks, like spoofed WiFi, or malicious management profiles to steal data. Attacks on the core mobile OS kernel, iOS and Android, are also becoming more sophisticated."

Mobile malware, for example, is also showing up pre-installed on some of the smartphone brands or embedded in apps in app stores like Google Play and Apple's App Store.

And while the report notes 75% of organizations average 35 rooted or jailbroken devices on their networks, Shaulov does not attribute that to the high percentage of companies exposed to malware. "People with jailbroken or rooted devices are power users and these are the guys who know what they are doing and are less susceptible to attacks," he says.

By industry, the Check Point report shows that financial services industry encountered the most mobile malware incidents, 39%, followed by government, 26%.

 [Source: Check Point]

Financial services devices also took the brunt of the various mobile malware types that surfaced, according to the report. Their devices accounted for:

  • 44% of all detected remote access Trojans (mRATs)
  • 40% of rough ad networks that run in the background and click on ads
  • 32% of information stealers

But when it comes to premium dialers, government-issued phones and government employees' BYOD devices were exposed to 43% of this type of malware. "Many of these premium dialers are related to phishing attacks and government employees, in particular, were more susceptible to phishing attacks," Shaulov says.

Related Content:

 

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two days of practical cyber defense discussions. Learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the INsecurity agenda here.

Dawn Kawamoto is an Associate Editor for Dark Reading, where she covers cybersecurity news and trends. She is an award-winning journalist who has written and edited technology, management, leadership, career, finance, and innovation stories for such publications as CNET's ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
PaulChau
50%
50%
PaulChau,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/14/2018 | 3:23:42 AM
Re: Healthcare attacks
Every device becomes vulnerable as long as it is connected to the internet. Anything can be done when it comes to malware unless we install an anti-spam software. Nevertheless, the developers of malwares are very smart when it comes to attacking tech gadgets. They would know how to work their way around and could even get past anti-spam and anti-virus softwares. This is rather worrying but as long as we install expensive and trusted softwares, we can rest at ease.
elenakretova
50%
50%
elenakretova,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/24/2017 | 2:02:07 AM
Re: Healthcare attacks
Thanks for sharing the information on Mobile Malware Incidents hit 100% of businesses
DonHarper
50%
50%
DonHarper,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/23/2017 | 4:42:46 PM
Re: Healthcare attacks
I'd really like to have an answer too !
alexporubay
50%
50%
alexporubay,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/23/2017 | 6:33:25 AM
Re: Healthcare attacks
nice one!
JackDilon
50%
50%
JackDilon,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/21/2017 | 5:59:26 PM
Re: Healthcare attacks
Read about this too. Can't remember where !
iSAFE
50%
50%
iSAFE,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/19/2017 | 10:38:40 PM
Healthcare attacks
Great information.  Thank you.  I have read recently that healthcare was on the top of the list for attacks.  Can you confirm where that industry places in "bullseye" for malware attacks?
Google Engineering Lead on Lessons Learned From Chrome's HTTPS Push
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  8/8/2018
White Hat to Black Hat: What Motivates the Switch to Cybercrime
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  8/8/2018
PGA of America Struck By Ransomware
Dark Reading Staff 8/9/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-3937
PUBLISHED: 2018-08-14
An exploitable command injection vulnerability exists in the measurementBitrateExec functionality of Sony IPELA E Series Network Camera G5 firmware 1.87.00. A specially crafted GET request can cause arbitrary commands to be executed. An attacker can send an HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability...
CVE-2018-3938
PUBLISHED: 2018-08-14
An exploitable stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the 802dot1xclientcert.cgi functionality of Sony IPELA E Series Camera G5 firmware 1.87.00. A specially crafted POST can cause a stack-based buffer overflow, resulting in remote code execution. An attacker can send a malicious POST r...
CVE-2018-12537
PUBLISHED: 2018-08-14
In Eclipse Vert.x version 3.0 to 3.5.1, the HttpServer response headers and HttpClient request headers do not filter carriage return and line feed characters from the header value. This allow unfiltered values to inject a new header in the client request or server response.
CVE-2018-12539
PUBLISHED: 2018-08-14
In Eclipse OpenJ9 version 0.8, users other than the process owner may be able to use Java Attach API to connect to an Eclipse OpenJ9 or IBM JVM on the same machine and use Attach API operations, which includes the ability to execute untrusted native code. Attach API is enabled by default on Windows,...
CVE-2018-3615
PUBLISHED: 2018-08-14
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and Intel software guard extensions (Intel SGX) may allow unauthorized disclosure of information residing in the L1 data cache from an enclave to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis.