Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Mobile

6/18/2014
04:18 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Malicious Google Play Clone Steals Banking Credentials

Google, FireEye disrupt sneaky Android malware operation.

FireEye and Google have dismantled part of a mobile malware operation that stole online banking credentials from Android users via a malicious and stealthy app posing as Google Play.

The malicious Android app has infected at least 200 victims in the past 30 days, and appears to be targeting Korean-speaking victims. So far, only three of fifty-one antivirus programs can detect the malware, which has a Korean-language user interface, according to FireEye. It's tough for AV to spot because the malware is encrypted behind the app's user interface.

The app uses an icon that looks like Google Play's icon, and sits on the mobile device home screen as an attempt to fool or confuse the user into clicking on it rather than on Google Play. Once it's clicked on and activated, it steals the user's text messages, signature certificates, and online banking passwords from the device.

One of the more confounding features of the app -- called Google App Stoy -- is that its "uninstall" function doesn't actually remove the app. Even if the user kills the app services in the back-end, they restart when the Android device is restarted.

(Image: FireEye)
(Image: FireEye)

"It disguises itself and evades detection better than most malware apps pretending to be legitimate ones by preventing users from removing it and encrypting and compressing the real malware until after the app is downloaded and opened," Jinjian Zhai, a mobile security researcher with FireEye who has analyzed the malware, says in an email interview. "Furthermore, it steals SMS, certificate, and bank account information using well-encrypted Gmail SSL protocol, allowing it to further evade detection."

Zhai says FireEye enlisted the help of Google to take down the attackers' Gmail accounts, where they were sending the stolen information from the victims' phones. "Gmail is using the SSL protocol, which can help hackers evade the traditional network detection," Zhai says.

But even with the attackers' Gmail accounts now taken down, the operation could easily retrench, he says. "We can only work with Google to stop the hackers' Gmail. But they still have HTTP servers online. They can also easily change the Gmail account to publish new malware," he says.

[UPDATED 6/19/2014:] This isn't the first time the malware has been spotted, however. Jeremy Linden, senior security product manager at mobile security firm Lookout Security says this malware has been circulating since late 2013. Lookout calls it PlayBanker, but it's also known as FakeKRB or FakeKRBank. "Banking malware has become quite advanced in Korea due to the prevalence of mobile banking in that region. There are several large prominent families that have been extensively covered in the Android malware world. This variant is very similar to previous variants of PlayBanker in its functionality, with the major change being in the obfuscation method. That is, the app hides the malicious code in asset files," Linden says.

That obfuscation has been in use in otehr Android malware variants, he says. "Lookout first saw this approach used in April 2012 when we identified new variants of Legacy Native that used a very similar method to conceal the malicious payload in an otherwise-functional image file. It is clear that the significant potential for financial gain will continue to motivate malware developers in Korea and elsewhere to try new techniques to conceal their activities in the future," he says.

To kill the infection, victims should deactivate the app in the Device Administrator settings and then uninstall it, he says.

Meanwhile, just how victims initially become infected with the new malicious Google Play app is unclear. FireEye's Zhai says his firm received the sample from one of its customers, so didn't get any intelligence on the download lure. "However, the actual infection occurs after the app is downloaded and initially opened, which, when disguised as the official Google Play app, is an easy trick for a user to fall for," he says.

Even having two Google Play-looking icons on a screen can fool a busy or distracted user. "Sometimes the icons are not on the same page," which would make it even more likely the malicious one would be chosen, he says.

The attackers use a dynamic DNS server with SSL-enabled Gmail to gather the stolen information, and change their HTTP servers regularly.

"We have only found evidence in the last 30 days on about 200 victims. The older evidence has been removed by the hacker," he says.

The full technical analysis by FireEye is here.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Mobile Banking Malware Up 50% in First Half of 2019
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/17/2020
7 Tips for Infosec Pros Considering A Lateral Career Move
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/21/2020
For Mismanaged SOCs, The Price Is Not Right
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment:   It's a PEN test of our cloud security.
Current Issue
IT 2020: A Look Ahead
Are you ready for the critical changes that will occur in 2020? We've compiled editor insights from the best of our network (Dark Reading, Data Center Knowledge, InformationWeek, ITPro Today and Network Computing) to deliver to you a look at the trends, technologies, and threats that are emerging in the coming year. Download it today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-7245
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
Incorrect username validation in the registration processes of CTFd through 2.2.2 allows a remote attacker to take over an arbitrary account after initiating a password reset. This is related to register() and reset_password() in auth.py. To exploit the vulnerability, one must register with a userna...
CVE-2019-14885
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
A flaw was found in the JBoss EAP Vault system in all versions before 7.2.6.GA. Confidential information of the system property's security attribute value is revealed in the JBoss EAP log file when executing a JBoss CLI 'reload' command. This flaw can lead to the exposure of confidential information...
CVE-2019-17570
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
An untrusted deserialization was found in the org.apache.xmlrpc.parser.XmlRpcResponseParser:addResult method of Apache XML-RPC (aka ws-xmlrpc) library. A malicious XML-RPC server could target a XML-RPC client causing it to execute arbitrary code. Apache XML-RPC is no longer maintained and this issue...
CVE-2020-6007
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
Philips Hue Bridge model 2.X prior to and including version 1935144020 contains a Heap-based Buffer Overflow when handling a long ZCL string during the commissioning phase, resulting in a remote code execution.
CVE-2012-4606
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
Citrix XenServer 4.1, 6.0, 5.6 SP2, 5.6 Feature Pack 1, 5.6 Common Criteria, 5.6, 5.5, 5.0, and 5.0 Update 3 contains a Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability which could allow local users with access to a guest operating system to gain elevated privileges.