Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Mobile

5/24/2011
05:28 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Half Of Lost Or Stolen Mobile Devices Store Sensitive Company Data

Carnegie Mellon, McAfee report finds that one-third of lost mobile device cases resulted in financial loss to the organization

Mobile devices are coming to work in droves, and they're being lost or stolen en masse, too: Four in 10 organizations say some of their mobile devices have been lost or stolen, half of which housed business-critical information, a new study says.

The study includes findings from surveys of senior IT decision-makers and end users worldwide, conducted by Vanson Bourne on behalf of Carnegie Mellon University and McAfee on the mobile security and consumerization of IT. About half of the 1,500 respondents across 14 countries say they are "very" or "extremely" reliant on mobile devices, and nearly seven in 10 organizations say they rely more on these devices now than 12 months ago.

The good news is that 95 percent of organizations have mobile security policies, but the bad news is that only one in three employees are "very aware" of these policies. And 63 percent of these laptops, tablets, external drives, smartphones, netbooks, and USBs are employed for personal use as well as business use. The breakdown: Seventy-two percent use personal laptops for work; 48 percent, personal smartphones; 46 percent, personal USBs; 33 percent, personal external hard drives; 19 percent, personal netbooks; and 10 percent, personal tablets.

Jamie Barnett, senior director of mobility product marketing for McAfee, says mobile devices will be the next frontier for malware and other attacks. The report did not go into any abuse of data on the lost or stolen devices.

"There's a ton of concern both from individual users and IT organizations about mobile devices being lost [or stolen] and what happens to the corporate data on them," Barnett says. Around 75 percent of the end users surveyed for the report say they are somewhat or very concerned about data loss due to theft, while some 54 percent of IT staffers were, she says.

Security policies for these devices are all over the map, Barnett says. "Policies are both set and enforced differently," she says. Among the typical policies are rules for what a device can be used for; how the company monitors the end user's communications on the device; device parameters for accessing the corporate network; and technical specifications, such as encryption and password complexity.

The report says more than one-third of the lost device cases came with a financial loss to the organization, and two-thirds of those companies have upped their device security in the wake of a lost or stolen one.

Around 50 percent of users store passwords, PIN numbers, or credit card information on their mobile devices, and less than half say they do weekly backups of data on their mobile devices.

"We're transitioning from the notion of a lifelong, long-term employee to more of a contractor type of employment: I'm an individual employee coming in with my 'kit' of stuff -- my personal database, my knowledge, my own technology, and my own [mobile] devices. Organizations need to welcome them in with their 'kit,' and then at the end of the relationship let those employees go with their kit intact, but also be able to claw back the corporate data that belongs to the organization."

The full report, "Mobility and Security: Dazzling Opportunities, Profound Challenges" is available here (PDF) for download.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 5/27/2020
10 iOS Security Tips to Lock Down Your iPhone
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  5/22/2020
How an Industry Consortium Can Reinvent Security Solution Testing
Henry Harrison, Co-founder & Chief Technology Officer, Garrison,  5/21/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-13632
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-27
ext/fts3/fts3_snippet.c in SQLite before 3.32.0 has a NULL pointer dereference via a crafted matchinfo() query.
CVE-2020-13253
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-27
sd_wp_addr in hw/sd/sd.c in QEMU 4.2.0 uses an unvalidated address, which leads to an out-of-bounds read during sdhci_write() operations. A guest OS user can crash the QEMU process.
CVE-2020-13630
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-27
ext/fts3/fts3.c in SQLite before 3.32.0 has a use-after-free in fts3EvalNextRow, related to the snippet feature.
CVE-2020-13631
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-27
SQLite before 3.32.0 allows a virtual table to be renamed to the name of one of its shadow tables, related to alter.c and build.c.
CVE-2020-4226
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-27
IBM MobileFirst Platform Foundation 8.0.0.0 stores highly sensitive information in URL parameters. This may lead to information disclosure if unauthorized parties have access to the URLs via server logs, referrer header or browser history. IBM X-Force ID: 175207.