Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


04:45 PM
Connect Directly

FBI Cracks Terrorist’s iPhone -- Sans Apple

Now there's a new hole in the iPhone 5c, so what happens next?

A highly contentious legal battle between Apple and the FBI officially is over now after the US Department of Justice late yesterday withdrew its lawsuit ordering Apple to unlock an iPhone used by one of the attackers in the San Bernardino shootings.

The FBI was able to access the data in question from the iPhone 5c without the help of Apple, but from a "third party," according to the Justice Department. And so far the feds aren’t saying just how they were able to finally obtain the data, which means there’s a vulnerability Apple now must find and fix on its own if the FBI doesn’t share it with the tech firm.

It's unclear whether the FBI ultimately will share the flaw or technique with Apple. The FBI is under “no obligation” to do so, says David Raissipour, senior vice president of product and engineering at Carbonite.

“What they found is what Apple was afraid of, anyway: that there some some vulnerability ... that circumvents its security,” he says. Ideally, the FBI would share its finding with Apple, he says, but the agency likely doesn’t want to give up its edge in cracking the backlog of other locked iPhone cases.

Since Apple has made it clear it won’t play ball and provide the FBI a backdoor, the FBI had to go it alone, and that means the FBI expands its own capabilities for cracking the devices, says David Maynor, CTO at Errata Security. “Now the FBI is able to expand its 0day capabilities for good reasons.” 

So Apple’s victory of standing tall to the feds’ requests for a backdoor into this specific iPhone may be short-lived. The long-term implications, Maynor says, are that the FBI must “hoard 0day now” to conduct future similar investigations that require getting iPhone data.

Meanwhile, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) argues that if the FBI indeed used a previously unknown vulnerability to crack the phone, it must disclose that to Apple. “Thanks to a lawsuit by EFF, the government has released its official policy for determining when to disclose security vulnerabilities, the Vulnerabilities Equities Process (VEP),” EFF staff attorney Andrew Crocker wrote in a blog post last night. “If the FBI used a vulnerability to get into the iPhone in the San Bernardino case, the VEP must apply, meaning that there should be a very strong bias in favor of informing Apple of the vulnerability. That would allow Apple to fix the flaw and protect the security of all its users. We look forward to seeing more transparency on this issue as well."

Apple says the FBI was out of line in its legal proceeding. “This case should never have been brought,” Apple said in a statement after the FBI’s dismissal of the suit, noting that the FBI’s demands “would have set a dangerous precedent” of backdoors into devices.

“We will continue to help law enforcement with their investigations, as we have done all along, and we will continue to increase the security of our products as the threats and attacks on our data become more frequent and more sophisticated,” the company said. “This case raised issues which deserve a national conversation about our civil liberties, and our collective security and privacy. Apple remains committed to participating in that discussion.”

Just how much a new hole in the iPhone 5c puts users at risk is unclear. “Ideally, it all comes down to risk,” says Chris Pierson, CSO and general counsel at Viewpost. It depends on what weakness was found, how it was exploited, and whether it’s something other attackers could abuse in similarly configured devices, he says.

“If it only applies to that specific phone with that specific operating system and only certain factors at play,” then the widespread risk would be low, Pierson says. “Whether the severity or likelihood of it being found by others, and what it means to the broader population” is the question, he says.

Also unclear is just who was the “third party” that assisted the FBI in cracking the phone. Speculation has run from security experts in the private sector to the NSA.

What happens now with the FBI-Apple relationship in the aftermath of the case? Viewpost’s Pierson says the best thing that could happen next is for the FBI to extend an “olive branch” to Apple and the security industry.

The FBI should initiate a meeting with security industry experts where the FBI could share details of the hack with “cleared members from industry and academia who would be able to provide advice, guidance, and feedback, on what the bureau can do differently and what avenues to take in the future when it happens again,” he says. “These would be just suggestions, not locking” them into anything, he notes.

Related Content:


Interop 2016 Las VegasFind out more about security threats at Interop 2016, May 2-6, at the Mandalay Bay Convention Center, Las Vegas. Click here for pricing information and to register.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Strategist
4/5/2016 | 10:01:57 AM
Yes, there is no surprise in it
User Rank: Apprentice
4/4/2016 | 5:32:53 AM
Re: iphone
Yeah fix it for 24hrs till the company that makes the product/device to accomplish this task makes there tweak aswell.  Its a constant game really
User Rank: Apprentice
4/4/2016 | 5:29:34 AM
For product that is made there is another product made to break that product.  I don't know why its such a big fuss?  It is just a high profile case so the FBI took a unique approach to the situation and the media ate it all up and did the talking for them.  Whats the longest passcode you can make 6 digits? 2 words, Brute Force & Dictionary Attack.  I was gunna offer to help'em but only a fool would truly think the FBI couldnt accomplish that inhouse themselves.
Arda Jeff
Arda Jeff,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/1/2016 | 1:46:19 PM
Re: iphone
Yes, there is no surprise in it. They may simply bypassed the lock screen in iOS. Latest iOS update migh fix this issue
User Rank: Ninja
4/1/2016 | 9:24:40 AM
The iphone's lock screen has consistently been insecure even with any iOS updates. There is no doubt in my mind that it was simply bypassed.
User Rank: Apprentice
3/30/2016 | 1:35:56 PM
Apple Phone
I have said from day 1, hire a white hat hacker, give $5,00 and a case of Mountain Dew and you will have all the data you want off the phone the next morning. I sure hope Apple plugs the leak in their OS.
Joe Stanganelli
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
3/30/2016 | 8:02:24 AM
Not McAfee?
Well, the third party likely wasn't John McAfee -- else he'd be bragging about it all over the news stations.  ;)
User Rank: Apprentice
3/30/2016 | 7:11:56 AM
Suspension of Disbelief
To believe that they could not do this from day one is naive at best.
Data Leak Week: Billions of Sensitive Files Exposed Online
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  12/10/2019
Intel Issues Fix for 'Plundervolt' SGX Flaw
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  12/11/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industry’s conventional wisdom. Here’s a look at what they’re thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-14
There is an improper authentication vulnerability in Huawei smartphones (Y9, Honor 8X, Honor 9 Lite, Honor 9i, Y6 Pro). The applock does not perform a sufficient authentication in a rare condition. Successful exploit could allow the attacker to use the application locked by applock in an instant.
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-14
Some Huawei smart phones have a null pointer dereference vulnerability. An attacker crafts specific packets and sends to the affected product to exploit this vulnerability. Successful exploitation may cause the affected phone to be abnormal.
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
There is an information disclosure vulnerability in certain Huawei smartphones (Mate 10;Mate 10 Pro;Honor V10;Changxiang 7S;P-smart;Changxiang 8 Plus;Y9 2018;Honor 9 Lite;Honor 9i;Mate 9). The software does not properly handle certain information of applications locked by applock in a rare condition...
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
Huawei CloudUSM-EUA V600R006C10;V600R019C00 have an information leak vulnerability. Due to improper configuration, the attacker may cause information leak by successful exploitation.
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
Certain Huawei products (AP2000;IPS Module;NGFW Module;NIP6300;NIP6600;NIP6800;S5700;SVN5600;SVN5800;SVN5800-C;SeMG9811;Secospace AntiDDoS8000;Secospace USG6300;Secospace USG6500;Secospace USG6600;USG6000V;eSpace U1981) have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. An attacker who logs in to the board m...