Mobile

11/14/2017
11:54 AM
50%
50%

Enterprise Physical Security Drives IoT Adoption

The vast majority of respondents to a new survey are deploying IoT technologies for building safety in the form of security cameras.

Enterprises are adopting Internet of Things devices to improve operational processes and cut costs, but the number one reason is for physical security, according to a survey released today.

Based on responses from 400 IT professionals at US, Canada, and UK enterprises, 32% of respondents point to a need for increased physical security as the top IoT adoption driver, according to the State of IoT 2017-2018 report. Other reasons for adoption cited by participants include improved operational processes (23%), reduced operational costs (21%), and simplified management (20%).

IoT Gets Physical

The Spiceworks research, which was commissioned by Cradlepoint, found the vast majority of survey respondents already use IoT technologies, with 71% deploying them for building security that largely comes in the form of security cameras.

"People have different ideas of what is an IoT device. It can be a security camera, motion detector sensors, or an RFID tag on a hanger in a retail store," says Ken Hosac, vice president of IoT business development at Cradlepoint. "These are block and tackle IoT projects."

Hosac says defensive forms of technology that keep a building or merchandise secure is not only a top motivator for enterprises to deploy IoT devices, but they are also among the easiest things to implement.

Mirai Considerations

But as IoT devices become more ubiquitous, so does the potential threat of a cyber attack on these devices. That notion is not lost on enterprises, with 40% of survey respondents listing cybersecurity as a top concern, according to the report.

Mirai, for example, commandeered vulnerable IoT devices, such as security cameras, to launch botnet-enabled DDoS attacks last year and inspired a number of copycat IoT botnets like Persirai.

Hosac advises enterprises to avoid placing IoT devices on their existing networks. Instead he recommends creating a new, separate network for IoT devices, or a software-defined perimeter network with a virtual network overlay on top of an existing network.

"Enterprises think they can buy antivirus software they use on their desktops and laptops and put it on their IoT devices. But with IoT there is a mix of different types of security that is needed," he says, noting some devices are closed systems where it is impossible to even send a software update to the device.

Related Content:

 

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two days of practical cyber defense discussions. Learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the INsecurity agenda here.

Dawn Kawamoto is an Associate Editor for Dark Reading, where she covers cybersecurity news and trends. She is an award-winning journalist who has written and edited technology, management, leadership, career, finance, and innovation stories for such publications as CNET's ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
WebAuthn, FIDO2 Infuse Browsers, Platforms with Strong Authentication
John Fontana, Standards & Identity Analyst, Yubico,  9/19/2018
Turn the NIST Cybersecurity Framework into Reality: 5 Steps
Mukul Kumar & Anupam Sahai, CISO & VP of Cyber Practice and VP Product Management, Cavirin Systems,  9/20/2018
NSS Labs Files Antitrust Suit Against Symantec, CrowdStrike, ESET, AMTSO
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/19/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: White Privelege Day
Current Issue
Flash Poll
The Risk Management Struggle
The Risk Management Struggle
The majority of organizations are struggling to implement a risk-based approach to security even though risk reduction has become the primary metric for measuring the effectiveness of enterprise security strategies. Read the report and get more details today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-6504
PUBLISHED: 2018-09-20
A potential Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability has been identified in ArcSight Management Center (ArcMC) in all versions prior to 2.81. This vulnerability could be exploited to allow for Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).
CVE-2018-6505
PUBLISHED: 2018-09-20
A potential Unauthenticated File Download vulnerability has been identified in ArcSight Management Center (ArcMC) in all versions prior to 2.81. This vulnerability could be exploited to allow for Unauthenticated File Downloads.
CVE-2018-14796
PUBLISHED: 2018-09-20
Tec4Data SmartCooler, all versions prior to firmware 180806, the device responds to a remote unauthenticated reboot command that may be used to perform a denial of service attack.
CVE-2018-14821
PUBLISHED: 2018-09-20
Rockwell Automation RSLinx Classic Versions 4.00.01 and prior. This vulnerability may allow a remote, unauthenticated threat actor to intentionally send a malformed CIP packet to Port 44818, causing the RSLinx Classic application to terminate. The user will need to manually restart the software to r...
CVE-2018-14827
PUBLISHED: 2018-09-20
Rockwell Automation RSLinx Classic Versions 4.00.01 and prior. A remote, unauthenticated threat actor may intentionally send specially crafted Ethernet/IP packets to Port 44818, causing the software application to stop responding and crash. The user must restart the software to regain functionality.