Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

Consumers Don't Trust Businesses Can Protect Their Data

New data shows fears of irresponsible handling of sensitive data, to a lack of control over their personal digital information breeds distrust among consumers.

High-profile breaches around the globe are putting consumers on edge and instilling a sense of mistrust that financial institutions and other businesses can deal with securing their sensitive information and data, according to two recent reports.

In the past year alone, Equifax suffered a massive breach which exposed the personally identity information of 143 million consumers in the US and Yahoo announced its 2013 breach ultimately affected all of its 3 billion account holders.

"The threat landscape is continually evolving," says Pieter Penning, a PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) Cybersecurity and Privacy Practice partner.

Indeed. Consumers are aware of cybersecurity threats, such as the emergence of ransomware, and remain skeptical that companies can ward them off in an attack or prevent a repeat occurrence post attack, according to reports from PwC and the BAV Group, which surveyed more than 2,000 Americans as part of their Consumer Intelligence Series: Protect.me, and a study by Carnegie Mellon University professor Rahul Telang and his student Sriram Somanchi, who issued a report Security, Fraudulent Transactions and Customer Loyalty: A Field Study.

These concerns could lead to consumers discontinuing their patronization of a business, the reports note.

"For financial firms, we know that they will lose customers if they are not proactive in reaching out to them [post attack]. For the other firms, the long-term implications are still not well documented," Telang says. "Of course, the short-term fallout is that firms incur significant costs in managing their reputation [post attack]."

The findings in the reports reveal consumers' attitudes toward the cybersecurity of the companies they deal with, and what organizations can do to retain their customers before and after a breach:

Majority of consumers worry about cyberattacks. The PwC report finds 69% of consumers believe companies they patronize are vulnerable to hacks and cyberattacks.

Lack control over personal information. Only 10% of PwC survey respondents feel they have complete control over their personal information.

Trustworthiness varies among industries. The cybersecurity of banks are perceived safe, 42%, compared with the marketing and advertising industry, 3%, according to the PwC report.

Willing to walk away. Companies failing to handle their customers' data responsibly may find 87% of their customers will take their business elsewhere, according to the PwC survey.

Businesses should disclose why a cyberattack occurred. Financial firms face a 3%-point increase in customer churn if they fail to explain to customers why the incident or breach happened in the first place, the Carnegie Mellon report states. Without this explanation, customers feel their future transactions remain at risk.

Reach out and compensate. Of all the steps a company can take to retain a customer after a breach, compensation was the highest, 27%, among PwC survey respondents. Carnegie Mellon's Telang also notes that if harm to a consumer is clear, reach out to them in a personal way and compensate them in either money or service to reduce the chance they will discontinue patronizing the business.

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two days of practical cyber defense discussions. Learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the INsecurity agenda here.

 

Related Content:

Dawn Kawamoto is an Associate Editor for Dark Reading, where she covers cybersecurity news and trends. She is an award-winning journalist who has written and edited technology, management, leadership, career, finance, and innovation stories for such publications as CNET's ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Manchester United Suffers Cyberattack
Dark Reading Staff 11/23/2020
As 'Anywhere Work' Evolves, Security Will Be Key Challenge
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/23/2020
Cloud Security Startup Lightspin Emerges From Stealth
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  11/24/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-29378
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-29
An issue was discovered on V-SOL V1600D V2.03.69 and V2.03.57, V1600D4L V1.01.49, V1600D-MINI V1.01.48, V1600G1 V2.0.7 and V1.9.7, and V1600G2 V1.1.4 OLT devices. It is possible to elevate the privilege of a CLI user (to full administrative access) by using the password [email protected]#y$z%x6x7q8c9z) for the e...
CVE-2020-29379
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-29
An issue was discovered on V-SOL V1600D4L V1.01.49 and V1600D-MINI V1.01.48 OLT devices. During the process of updating the firmware, the update script starts a telnetd -l /bin/sh process that does not require authentication for TELNET access.
CVE-2020-29380
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-29
An issue was discovered on V-SOL V1600D V2.03.69 and V2.03.57, V1600D4L V1.01.49, V1600D-MINI V1.01.48, V1600G1 V2.0.7 and V1.9.7, and V1600G2 V1.1.4 OLT devices. TELNET is offered by default but SSH is not always available. An attacker can intercept passwords sent in cleartext and conduct a man-in-...
CVE-2020-29381
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-29
An issue was discovered on V-SOL V1600D V2.03.69 and V2.03.57, V1600D4L V1.01.49, V1600D-MINI V1.01.48, V1600G1 V2.0.7 and V1.9.7, and V1600G2 V1.1.4 OLT devices. Command injection can occur in "upload tftp syslog" and "upload tftp configuration" in the CLI via a crafted filename...
CVE-2020-29382
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-29
An issue was discovered on V-SOL V1600D V2.03.69 and V2.03.57, V1600G1 V2.0.7 and V1.9.7, and V1600G2 V1.1.4 OLT devices. A hardcoded RSA private key (specific to V1600D, V1600G1, and V1600G2) is contained in the firmware images.