Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Mobile Security

// // //
10/30/2019
11:50 AM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb

Xhelper Will Be Back Whether You Want It or Not

Researcher says that this Trojan dropper variant of the original Android malware has infected more than 45,000 Android devices over the last six months.

The enterprise's adoption of liberal BYOD policies over the years has led it to the point where the operating system of some connected devices can serve as an attack vector. Android, for example, has some inherent flaws that are just being starting to be exploited by threat actors in this way.

Xhelper is a Trojan dropper variant of the original Android malware that was first seen in March 2019. Mary Ying Tee of Symantec issued a report on it that avers it will reinstall itself after it has been removed. Further, it comes back following a factory reset.

The researcher says that Xhelper has infected more than 45,000 Android devices over the last six months. In the past month alone, there was an average of 131 devices infected each day, and an average of 2,400 devices persistently infected throughout the month. It’s geospecic in what it aims for, going after devices in the US, India and Russia.

This morbid persistence has been evident since the first version of it that was detected. Reddit conversations between users during the first occurrence point out that killing this little bugger is hard and that it may be resurrected by over-the-air updates which could wittingly or unwittingly be spreading the malware code.

Xhelper is not an app, it is an application component that takes actions. Being of this form makes it easier to be stealthy in the actions that it takes. The device’s application launcher won’t show that it is present. The report says that, “Xhelper can’t be launched manually since there is no app icon visible on the launcher. Instead, the malicious app is launched by external events, such as when the compromised device is connected to or disconnected from a power supply, the device is rebooted, or an app is installed or uninstalled.”

Once activated, it decrypts to memory the malicious payload that is embedded in its package. The payload will connect to the attacker’s command and control (C&C) server and wait for a command to download further malware payloads. SSL certificate pinning is used for all communication between the victim’s device and the C&C server, increasing the stealth of the communication.

Xhelper’s functionality has expanded drastically in recent times, according to Symantec. They say that they “strongly believe that the malware’s source code is still a work in progress.” The researchers have seen Xhelper-containing apps installed more frequently on certain phone brands, which leads them to believe that the attackers may be focusing on specific brands. However, they believe it to be unlikely that Xhelper comes preinstalled on devices given that these apps don’t have any indication of being system apps in origin.

Xhelper is a nasty Trojan platform that has seemingly not yet hit its stride where functionality is concerned. It deserves serious attention from those dealing with Android devices in a network.

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Black Hat USA 2022 Attendee Report
Black Hat attendees are not sleeping well. Between concerns about attacks against cloud services, ransomware, and the growing risks to the global supply chain, these security pros have a lot to be worried about. Read our 2022 report to hear what they're concerned about now.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-2597
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-08
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none.
CVE-2017-2631
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-08
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none.
CVE-2017-2657
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-08
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none.
CVE-2017-7527
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-08
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none.
CVE-2021-41615
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-08
websda.c in GoAhead WebServer 2.1.8 has insufficient nonce entropy because the nonce calculation relies on the hardcoded onceuponatimeinparadise value, which does not follow the secret-data guideline for HTTP Digest Access Authentication in RFC 7616 section 3.3 (or RFC 2617 section 3.2.1). NOTE: 2.1...