Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Forensic Approach To Mobile App Vulnerability Research
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
flast_name606
50%
50%
flast_name606,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/1/2012 | 5:03:52 AM
re: Forensic Approach To Mobile App Vulnerability Research
I don't agree that forensics is a "good" way to evaluate mobile platforms or apps for vulnerabilities. I think they are "one" way, but they do not get into the runtime or the binaries or code.

My favorite tools for runtime are cycript for iOS and strace for Android, which are not equivalent tools. strace can really see what files and networks are touched by an Android app that Burp and mac-robber will never see into...
johnhsawyer
50%
50%
johnhsawyer,
User Rank: Moderator
4/1/2012 | 2:27:46 PM
re: Forensic Approach To Mobile App Vulnerability Research
Thank you for the comment. I'm not advocating this approach is the only way--far from it. This is simply a basic, introductory approach to get people started that is easier to explain and teach. It can built upon or be a precursor to advanced methods like runtime analysis and binary reverse engineering.

Plus, I like finding alternative uses of tools to do things outside of what they were designed to do and the application of timeline analysis with mac-robber here is a good example of that.

(I'm sure you know the following, but I'm including it for other readers.) The difference between the tools you mention and those I discuss are akin to the difference between static binary and runtime analysis of executables (like malware) to behavioral analysis of what happens to the system when the executable runs.

There is a learning curve and depth of knowledge that the average system administrator and security professional won't have for more advanced methods so they're less likely to be comfortable with GDB and IDA Pro, but they would be more comfortable with analyzing environmental changes to the filesystem, Registry, event logs, etc. and looking at network traffic (maybe even strace if they have *nix background). That's where this approach allows them to leverage their knowledge to do analysis and can build upon that experience to do more advanced analysis later on.

-jhs


News
Former CISA Director Chris Krebs Discusses Risk Management & Threat Intel
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/23/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
Security + Fraud Protection: Your One-Two Punch Against Cyberattacks
Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  2/23/2021
News
Cybercrime Groups More Prolific, Focus on Healthcare in 2020
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/22/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Building the SOC of the Future
Building the SOC of the Future
Digital transformation, cloud-focused attacks, and a worldwide pandemic. The past year has changed the way business works and the way security teams operate. There is no going back.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-27132
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
SerComm AG Combo VD625 AGSOT_2.1.0 devices allow CRLF injection (for HTTP header injection) in the download function via the Content-Disposition header.
CVE-2021-25284
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
An issue was discovered in through SaltStack Salt before 3002.5. salt.modules.cmdmod can log credentials to the info or error log level.
CVE-2021-3144
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
In SaltStack Salt before 3002.5, eauth tokens can be used once after expiration. (They might be used to run command against the salt master or minions.)
CVE-2021-3148
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
An issue was discovered in SaltStack Salt before 3002.5. Sending crafted web requests to the Salt API can result in salt.utils.thin.gen_thin() command injection because of different handling of single versus double quotes. This is related to salt/utils/thin.py.
CVE-2021-3151
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
i-doit before 1.16.0 is affected by Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) issues that could allow remote authenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via C__MONITORING__CONFIG__TITLE, SM2__C__MONITORING__CONFIG__TITLE, C__MONITORING__CONFIG__PATH, SM2__C__MONITORING__CONFIG__PATH, C__M...