Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Cloud's Privileged Identity Gap Intensifies Insider Threats
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
ANON1233933295565
50%
50%
ANON1233933295565,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/16/2013 | 10:22:06 PM
re: Cloud's Privileged Identity Gap Intensifies Insider Threats
It's a good question Tim.- Too often organizations feel that the administrative shared accounts are self-managed via a mirage of trust.- It's like the old Ronald Reagan philosophy, "trust but verify".-

It starts with discovery.- What shared accounts exist?- Then, what individuals have access to them?- If you can't assign unique accounts, then leverage vaulting capability of privileged access management products.- This-requires individuals check these shared account priviliges in, and out, and changes the credentials when done.- Now you have a clear audit trail of who used what.- But, realtime monitoring becomes a requirement.- Knowing what they did is as important as knowing who is doing it.

I believe identity and access intelligence plays a key role here.- This enables organizations to get real time notification when a risk is identified.- Risky applications with risky access privileges with suspect usage require immediate notification to the right people, with immediate remediation.

It's a key problem and requires preventative controls, detective controls, and realtime monitoring.

- Kurt Johnson, Courion Corporation
@kurtvj216:twitter
DarkReadingTim
50%
50%
DarkReadingTim,
User Rank: Strategist
1/15/2013 | 7:48:57 PM
re: Cloud's Privileged Identity Gap Intensifies Insider Threats
What's the best way to provision privileged users in the cloud? How can you be sure you won't get too many users with an overabundance of privileges?
--Tim Wilson, editor, Dark Reading
solcates
50%
50%
solcates,
User Rank: Author
1/15/2013 | 6:37:47 PM
re: Cloud's Privileged Identity Gap Intensifies Insider Threats
As Jonathan Sanders rightly points out, the age old problem of Gǣcontrolling the privileged userGǥ is compounded once you start to adopt a cloud model.

Adding controls like encryption are common to remove the provider from data.- However, one of the problems security professionals find is the one holding the keys, is often the provider themselves. Note that encryption does nothing to protect the data from a privileged user inside the instance itself.- -However, the combination of file-level encryption and database activity monitoring are typically enterprise best practices to protect databases, and file-level encryption in general protects data and can control privileged users.- File-Level encryption also should be driven by access controls that are outside of GǣrootGsGǥ control, to remove the keys to the data kingdom.


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
7 Old IT Things Every New InfoSec Pro Should Know
Joan Goodchild, Staff Editor,  4/20/2021
News
Cloud-Native Businesses Struggle With Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/6/2021
Commentary
Defending Against Web Scraping Attacks
Rob Simon, Principal Security Consultant at TrustedSec,  5/7/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-16632
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-15
A XSS Vulnerability in /uploads/dede/action_search.php in DedeCMS V5.7 SP2 allows an authenticated user to execute remote arbitrary code via the keyword parameter.
CVE-2021-32073
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-15
DedeCMS V5.7 SP2 contains a CSRF vulnerability that allows a remote attacker to send a malicious request to to the web manager allowing remote code execution.
CVE-2021-33033
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
The Linux kernel before 5.11.14 has a use-after-free in cipso_v4_genopt in net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c because the CIPSO and CALIPSO refcounting for the DOI definitions is mishandled, aka CID-ad5d07f4a9cd. This leads to writing an arbitrary value.
CVE-2021-33034
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
In the Linux kernel before 5.12.4, net/bluetooth/hci_event.c has a use-after-free when destroying an hci_chan, aka CID-5c4c8c954409. This leads to writing an arbitrary value.
CVE-2019-25044
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
The block subsystem in the Linux kernel before 5.2 has a use-after-free that can lead to arbitrary code execution in the kernel context and privilege escalation, aka CID-c3e2219216c9. This is related to blk_mq_free_rqs and blk_cleanup_queue.