Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Advanced Attacks Call For New Defenses
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Bprince
50%
50%
Bprince,
User Rank: Ninja
5/1/2012 | 2:31:03 AM
re: Advanced Attacks Call For New Defenses
I think there is room for both Arkin and Wang's points of view. Both are correct in a sense...
Brian Prince, InformationWeek/Dark Reading Comment Moderator
CiscoJones
50%
50%
CiscoJones,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/1/2012 | 12:36:51 PM
re: Advanced Attacks Call For New Defenses
Just a quick thought.- We need two new operating systems.- One for Dev and Q&A and the other for Prod.- The Prod server has two modes: maintenance and on-line.- When in on-line mode, nothing can be changed and least privilege is strictly enforced with no admin privileges.- Any admin changes will be done when the server is put into maintenance mode which will force all Internet applications (web, ftp, ssh, email, etc...) to shut down.- The Prod server will not allow connections to originate from it to the outside world so browsing, ftp/tftp, file share, etc... clients will not work.- The only way for an admin to move files on or off the server will be through the security hardened console mode.- Logs will be configured in maintenance mode to send to a SIEM in an encrypted tunnel.- This should fix the server issue.- Protecting the clients is going to be tougher.-
macker490
50%
50%
macker490,
User Rank: Ninja
5/1/2012 | 1:10:07 PM
re: Advanced Attacks Call For New Defenses
you got it!! production machines need to be locked down and then certified using a Software Inventory Audit.- If they pass the audit they get a production certificate (x.509 ) which remains valid until the machine requires maintenanace.- as soon as maintenace starts its x.509 certificate is REVOKED .After the maintenance it will be re-certified and a new certificate created.

MSFT AppLocker is a very important concept in this. In AppLocker YOU specify what OS and apps you will allow; anything else is ejected.

remember: the common element in hacking is un-authorized programming, used to compromise the operation of the victim.
sweerek
50%
50%
sweerek,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/1/2012 | 7:03:52 PM
re: Advanced Attacks Call For New Defenses
Even better than no root is no persistence. Boot the machine from ROM (think LiveCD) and then reboot occasionally to insure a pristine machine. -Also, don't 'not allow' but rather not even provide the code/kernel to do those things. In other words, don't lockdown, gut instead. -These and other approaches are old hat to AFRL and form the Three Tenets of CyberSecurity -- see-http://spi.dod.mil/tenets.htm. Wrt clients, the solution is Secure End Nodes, see -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.... -
macker490
50%
50%
macker490,
User Rank: Ninja
5/1/2012 | 1:04:23 PM
re: Advanced Attacks Call For New Defenses
System Intake: where you have web-browsers and e/mail programs taking in data pages all day every day -- and Hackers busy building kits to manufacture polymorphic virus attacks, well yes: you do need to proceed with the idea that you are going to take in some bad code

and that bad code will attempt to direct one of your applications to do something it should never have been allowed to do: update your system

and so: the "sandbox"- -- essentially Problem State a'la System /360, c.1965

way to go, margie [belated applause]

the appearance of executable documents -- i.e. documents containing Java, Visual Basic etc creates a new and worse problem: what occurs if an executable document is moved from its intake area into another directory on the system and is picked up by a user or process that has sensitive privileges?

creating executable documents was a bad idea to begin with but now that we have them we will have to determine what to do when such a document is moved from its intake area

this will turn out to be an ugly problem
sweerek
50%
50%
sweerek,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/1/2012 | 6:58:24 PM
re: Advanced Attacks Call For New Defenses
The best yet weak solution will be some new software or patch. -You cannot have a true sandbox on the same hardware. -Instead, why not use many-many core processors to each run their own environment (OS, apps, etc.) and contain it there. -AFRL created something like this about a decade ago, called the Cyber Sensing Station ---http://spi.dod.mil/docs/CSS_DS.... -It was built for many remote users to have full root / hardware access to servers, yet not exfiltrate data. -Wrt this article and jumping ahead a decade, each environ could run on its own hardware (not VM) yet be bounded inward & outward by hardware. -Just a thought.....


Commentary
Ransomware Is Not the Problem
Adam Shostack, Consultant, Entrepreneur, Technologist, Game Designer,  6/9/2021
Edge-DRsplash-11-edge-ask-the-experts
How Can I Test the Security of My Home-Office Employees' Routers?
John Bock, Senior Research Scientist,  6/7/2021
News
New Ransomware Group Claiming Connection to REvil Gang Surfaces
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  6/10/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-35196
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-21
** DISPUTED ** Manuskript through 0.12.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted settings.pickle file in a project file, because there is insecure deserialization via the pickle.load() function in settings.py. NOTE: the vendor's position is that the product is not intended fo...
CVE-2010-1433
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-21
Joomla! Core is prone to a vulnerability that lets attackers upload arbitrary files because the application fails to properly verify user-supplied input. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to upload arbitrary code and run it in the context of the webserver process. This may facilitate unauth...
CVE-2010-1434
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-21
Joomla! Core is prone to a session fixation vulnerability. An attacker may leverage this issue to hijack an arbitrary session and gain access to sensitive information, which may help in launching further attacks. Joomla! Core versions 1.5.x ranging from 1.5.0 and up to and including 1.5.15 are vulne...
CVE-2010-1435
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-21
Joomla! Core is prone to a security bypass vulnerability. Exploiting this issue may allow attackers to perform otherwise restricted actions and subsequently retrieve password reset tokens from the database through an already existing SQL injection vector. Joomla! Core versions 1.5.x ranging from 1.5...
CVE-2010-0413
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-21
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none.