Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Security Spending Still Doesn't Follow Attack And Breach Trends
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
AnonymousMan
100%
0%
AnonymousMan,
User Rank: Moderator
7/18/2013 | 10:03:17 PM
re: Security Spending Still Doesn't Follow Attack And Breach Trends
Well said. Perimeter defense is table stakes. Actually, if you include the new solutions targeting "APT" or advanced malware detection (FireEye, Damballa, everyone and their mother now) as network perimeter solutions, then that spending might even go up. Also, you have to consider that many "network perimeter" controls provide direct application and database protection. Is a WAF deployed as part of an F5 in the DMZ being counted as a network perimeter control or application control?

"I'm not going to approve implementing database security control X because Oracle is unbreakable"...said no executive, ever. That was marketing, No one is that stupid.
Hal Elujah
50%
50%
Hal Elujah,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/18/2013 | 5:00:32 PM
re: Security Spending Still Doesn't Follow Attack And Breach Trends
Saying that organizations are spending too much on network security and not enough on database and application security is like saying the bank spends too much on the building and not enough on the safe deposit boxes. But if a bad guy can't get into the building in the first place, isn't the safe already protected?

Likewise, if the perimeter of a network is sufficiently defended, this automatically provides greater protection for servers, applications, and databases.

Extending the metaphor, most banks are robbed by people who entered the building legally, initially posing as customers (a sort of testament to the strength of the outer, or building, defenses). Likewise, many database attacks are attempted by those who got into the network legally, initially posing as visitors (a testament to the strength of the outer network defenses). So, just as safes need to be protected in banks, databases and apps need to be protected within networks. But the bulk of the investment is at the perimeter -- as it should be.


Overcoming the Challenge of Shorter Certificate Lifespans
Mike Cooper, Founder & CEO of Revocent,  10/15/2020
7 Tips for Choosing Security Metrics That Matter
Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer,  10/19/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-27605
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-21
BigBlueButton through 2.2.8 uses Ghostscript for processing of uploaded EPS documents, and consequently may be subject to attacks related to a "schwache Sandbox."
CVE-2020-27606
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-21
BigBlueButton before 2.2.8 (or earlier) does not set the secure flag for the session cookie in an https session, which makes it easier for remote attackers to capture this cookie by intercepting its transmission within an http session.
CVE-2020-27607
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-21
In BigBlueButton before 2.2.8 (or earlier), the client-side Mute button only signifies that the server should stop accepting audio data from the client. It does not directly configure the client to stop sending audio data to the server, and thus a modified server could store the audio data and/or tr...
CVE-2020-27608
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-21
In BigBlueButton before 2.2.8 (or earlier), uploaded presentations are sent to clients without a Content-Type header, which allows XSS, as demonstrated by a .png file extension for an HTML document.
CVE-2020-27609
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-21
BigBlueButton through 2.2.8 records a video meeting despite the deactivation of video recording in the user interface. This may result in data storage beyond what is authorized for a specific meeting topic or participant.