Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
3 Web Security Takeaways From Wikipedia's Near Miss
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
2/14/2014 | 9:42:37 AM
Re: How did you find the vulnerability
Thse of us in the realm you protect, salute you (and others) for your work! Definitely a growing and important field. 
shahartal
50%
50%
shahartal,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/14/2014 | 3:33:37 AM
Re: How did you find the vulnerability
These was no external activity to prompt the investigation. We regularly identify popular platforms and perform research in order to expose vulnerabilities that might harm all kinds of users. We're no 'protectors of the realm' but we do our best to help secure the Internet.
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
2/13/2014 | 4:48:02 PM
How did you find the vulnerability
Shahar, Were you looking for something specific, or did some activity the investigation? 
shahartal
50%
50%
shahartal,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/13/2014 | 1:58:31 AM
Re: Was anyone actually affected?
The WikiMedia foundation has stated that they found no evidence of a past attack exploiting that vulnerability. Of course, the first thing a clever attacker would do is clean the logs. As for other web sites, I don't know of any other case yet, but as the exploit has been made public on exploit repositories, it's a matter of finding the unprotected ones and simply running a script.
jagibbons
50%
50%
jagibbons,
User Rank: Strategist
2/12/2014 | 9:56:26 PM
Re: Was anyone actually affected?
The false sense of security around the oldie but goodie attack vectors is a very real issue. In the quest to protect against the newest threats, we don't always think about the older variants that are still out there. Security teams can't take anything for granted. Continually test and verify that systems are protected as best as they can be.
Thomas Claburn
50%
50%
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Ninja
2/12/2014 | 7:05:54 PM
Was anyone actually affected?
Did anyone get hacked as a result of this flaw or is that still to come if sites don't patch quickly enough?


Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: "I feel safe, but I can't understand a word he's saying."
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
Data breaches and regulations have forced organizations to pay closer attention to the security incident response function. However, security leaders may be overestimating their ability to detect and respond to security incidents. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-11111
PUBLISHED: 2020-03-31
FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.4 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.apache.activemq.* (aka activemq-jms, activemq-core, activemq-pool, and activemq-pool-jms).
CVE-2020-11112
PUBLISHED: 2020-03-31
FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.4 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.apache.commons.proxy.provider.remoting.RmiProvider (aka apache/commons-proxy).
CVE-2020-11113
PUBLISHED: 2020-03-31
FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.4 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.apache.openjpa.ee.WASRegistryManagedRuntime (aka openjpa).
CVE-2020-10374
PUBLISHED: 2020-03-30
A webserver component in Paessler PRTG Network Monitor 19.2.50 to PRTG 20.1.56 allows unauthenticated remote command execution via a crafted POST request or the what parameter of the screenshot function in the Contact Support form.
CVE-2020-11104
PUBLISHED: 2020-03-30
An issue was discovered in USC iLab cereal through 1.3.0. Serialization of an (initialized) C/C++ long double variable into a BinaryArchive or PortableBinaryArchive leaks several bytes of stack or heap memory, from which sensitive information (such as memory layout or private keys) can be gleaned if...