Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Why I Pulled Out Of The RSA Conference
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
AnnieOhminus
50%
50%
AnnieOhminus,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/8/2014 | 2:53:29 PM
Why no one admits to deals with NSA
How many people realize that the reason no one ever admits to any deals or conversations with the NSA is that it is a felony to do so. Jail time, no trial, no defense allowed. Welcome to the Patriot Act and sedition act.
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
1/8/2014 | 3:44:00 PM
Will the boycott be effective
Dave, I give you and the eight other security researchers credit for taking such a principaled stand -- and especially for taking the time to spell out the reasons behind your decision to boycott RSA. You column adds a lot of needed depth to the discussion about how technology companies and the government should engage when dealing with privacy and security matters that impact public safety. That said, what do you and the other boycotters believe would be the best outcome from your actions?  
Thomas Claburn
50%
50%
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Ninja
1/8/2014 | 4:46:08 PM
Re: Will the boycott be effective
Too bad there's no plausible way to boycott the entire telecom infrastructure. Third-parites are the weak link in communication privacy.
asksqn
100%
0%
asksqn,
User Rank: Ninja
1/8/2014 | 5:15:07 PM
Blowback is warranted
Kudos for taking a stand against unwarranted surveillance and standing up for civil liberties. Perhaps if industry loses enough big name players in the federal government's obsession to turn the US into the old USSR, companies won't be so willing or so easily bought off to participate in the wholesale destruction of the Constitution.
dak3
50%
50%
dak3,
User Rank: Moderator
1/8/2014 | 11:12:44 PM
Re: Will the boycott be effective
I can't speak for the others, and I know it's probably too late for those who've made their plans already to be able to back out without financial hardship, but for me it's enough that the dialog keeps going. Vendors have to learn to take their customers' security as their top priority. After all, if they aren't secure why should we believe their products are?
Whoopty
50%
50%
Whoopty,
User Rank: Ninja
1/9/2014 | 11:51:55 AM
Re: Will the boycott be effective
Kudos to you sir for standing by your opinions, even though I'm sure it's a disappointment that you won't be speaking at the conference - for you and the audience. 

I do wonder though if the RSA would have been willing to say more about its NSA dealings if it wasn't no doubt clamped by secretive legislation?
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
1/9/2014 | 12:03:27 PM
Re: Will the boycott be effective
I imagine there is probably some gag order imposed by the NSA on RSA about disclosing what was in the contract but I'm not not aware of any legislation that would prohibit officials of a private company from defending itself against such such serious and public accusations...  (That's what lawyers, PR firm and spin doctors are for). Whether that would shed any light on the situation is another questions...
Stratustician
50%
50%
Stratustician,
User Rank: Moderator
1/15/2014 | 1:36:42 PM
So if not RSA...
I applaud your moral stance to defend the principal behind data security, that it actually protects data from unauthorized access. When the RSA breach in 2011 happened, it should have sent lots of warning flags and yet I still see those tokens everywhere.  Its as if the industry say "Meh, we'll get over it".  I wonder what it will take for people to seriously consider what the NSA implications mean from an industry perspective when it comes to security solutions.  

Has anyone actually started to migrate off RSA and onto another solution?  What are you considering to move to and why?
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
1/16/2014 | 10:31:05 AM
Re: So if not RSA... >Let's discuss practical options
@Stratustician That's a great question that is worthy of repeating. It  would be great to get a discussing going about the realities of taking a moral position about a product based on a vendor business decision. Is this even possible? 
Stratustician
50%
50%
Stratustician,
User Rank: Moderator
1/20/2014 | 1:27:08 PM
Re: So if not RSA... >Let's discuss practical options
I honestly wish it was a valid way of business, but sadly the reality is that organizations only care about the bottom line often.  From a security perspective, many organizations will argue "They've worked for us until now" as we saw evidenced by the lack of real market change after their breach.  I'd love to think we will see companies take more moral stances about who they conduct business with, but sadly I don't see this becoming the norm.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19589
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-05
The Lever PDF Embedder plugin 4.4 for WordPress does not block the distribution of polyglot PDF documents that are valid JAR archives.
CVE-2019-19597
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-05
D-Link DAP-1860 devices before v1.04b03 Beta allow arbitrary remote code execution as root without authentication via shell metacharacters within an HNAP_AUTH HTTP header.
CVE-2019-19598
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-05
D-Link DAP-1860 devices before v1.04b03 Beta allow access to administrator functions without authentication via the HNAP_AUTH header timestamp value. In HTTP requests, part of the HNAP_AUTH header is the timestamp used to determine the time when the user sent the request. If this value is equal to t...
CVE-2019-19596
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-05
GitBook through 2.6.9 allows XSS via a local .md file.
CVE-2019-19590
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-05
In radare2 through 4.0, there is an integer overflow for the variable new_token_size in the function r_asm_massemble at libr/asm/asm.c. This integer overflow will result in a Use-After-Free for the buffer tokens, which can be filled with arbitrary malicious data after the free. This allows remote at...