Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Understanding IT Risk Management In 4 Steps X 3
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
11/25/2013 | 10:19:58 AM
Re: Talk with Management
That makes a lot of sense, J_Brandt. And your point about how important it is for IT to set the stage in a face to face meeting with management is well taken. Dave's matrix lays out the foundation for that talk and puts the substance of the discussion in the context of an organization's critical issues and needs. 
J_Brandt
50%
50%
J_Brandt,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/24/2013 | 4:41:14 PM
Re: Talk with Management
It's less an elevator speech, and more a requested meeting.  As head of IT you need to understand where the concerns of risk management are.  Risk Management needs to understand the potential issues that go along with any new tech deployment.  It's a mutual need and education relationship.
Susan Fogarty
100%
0%
Susan Fogarty,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/21/2013 | 5:14:17 PM
Re: Calculating the cost of risk
dak3, that's an excellent point. any publicized breach in security can cost a company immeasurable loss in terms of customer trust and loyalty.
dak3
100%
0%
dak3,
User Rank: Moderator
11/21/2013 | 12:53:16 PM
Re: Calculating the cost of risk
The hardest part to quantify is loss of reputation which leads to loss of both current and future clients and - in extreme cases - to loss of the enterprise (e.g., Diginotar).

 

It's not a simple calculation by any means.
Marilyn Cohodas
100%
0%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
11/20/2013 | 9:11:23 AM
Re: Calculating the cost of risk
Downtime losses , seem to me, would be relatively easy to calculate in dollars and cents by estimating  the revenues that a company would be earned during a similar period of time. Or in an organization like a hospital, the number of patients whose care was disrupted and whatever additional costs were incurred to keep their conditions stable and improving. 

Loss of opportunity is a lot more difficult to put a hard number on. I'm open to suggestions! 
Susan Fogarty
50%
50%
Susan Fogarty,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/19/2013 | 2:22:42 PM
Calculating the cost of risk
It's easier to understand risk when you're talking in terms of a bank that has a certain amount of money it needs to insure. Even intellectual property can be quantified in most cases with a monetary value. But how do businesses quantify softer potential losses, like downtime and lost opportunity?
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
11/19/2013 | 12:26:01 PM
Re: Talk with Management
J_Brant. I'm very interested in hearing your strategy for talking to management about Risk Management. How would  you jumpstart the conversation (What your elevator pitch?)  and who within our organizatin would you enlist to help make the case? 
J_Brandt
50%
50%
J_Brandt,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/19/2013 | 12:09:29 PM
Re: Theory V. Practice of IT Risk Management
It is never that easy.  If for no other reason, because it involves lawyers.
J_Brandt
50%
50%
J_Brandt,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/19/2013 | 12:07:15 PM
Talk with Management
A good, simple article to use with management to jump start the conversation on risk management.
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
11/19/2013 | 9:23:13 AM
Theory V. Practice of IT Risk Management
This a very succint definition of risk management for an IT audience along with --what seems to be -- a simple strategy for getting started. But, realistically, can risk management really be that easy to implement? What are the biggest gotchas? What is the low-hanging fruit that put organizations on the path to success? Let's talk about the issues people are facing in the real world. 


Exploits Released for As-Yet Unpatched Critical Citrix Flaw
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  1/13/2020
Major Brazilian Bank Tests Homomorphic Encryption on Financial Data
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/10/2020
Will This Be the Year of the Branded Cybercriminal?
Raveed Laeb, Product Manager at KELA,  1/13/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
[Just Released] How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
[Just Released] How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-3682
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-17
The docker-kubic package in SUSE CaaS Platform 3.0 before 17.09.1_ce-7.6.1 provided access to an insecure API locally on the Kubernetes master node.
CVE-2019-17361
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-17
In SaltStack Salt through 2019.2.0, the salt-api NEST API with the ssh client enabled is vulnerable to command injection. This allows an unauthenticated attacker with network access to the API endpoint to execute arbitrary code on the salt-api host.
CVE-2019-19142
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-17
Intelbras WRN240 devices do not require authentication to replace the firmware via a POST request to the incoming/Firmware.cfg URI.
CVE-2019-19801
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-17
In Gallagher Command Centre Server versions of v8.10 prior to v8.10.1134(MR4), v8.00 prior to v8.00.1161(MR5), v7.90 prior to v7.90.991(MR5), v7.80 prior to v7.80.960(MR2) and v7.70 or earlier, an unprivileged but authenticated user is able to perform a backup of the Command Centre databases.
CVE-2019-19802
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-17
In Gallagher Command Centre Server v8.10 prior to v8.10.1134(MR4), v8.00 prior to v8.00.1161(MR5), v7.90 prior to v7.90.991(MR5), v7.80 prior to v7.80.960(MR2) and v7.70 or earlier, an authenticated user connecting to OPCUA can view all data that would be replicated in a multi-server setup without p...