Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Most Consumers Don't Lock Mobile Phone Via PIN
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
AnhT053
50%
50%
AnhT053,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/27/2014 | 5:31:01 AM
Video clip Recreation
3D animated fun, humor and the latest

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XHhmkBzetM
jamescraig
50%
50%
jamescraig,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/30/2014 | 3:56:52 AM
Consumer Behavior
Consumer behavior is the key of the success of any business. The companies who care fore thye feedback about their machines and electronics can develop better products with the passage of time. 
herman_munster
50%
50%
herman_munster,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/24/2012 | 8:19:15 PM
re: Most Consumers Don't Lock Mobile Phone Via PIN
My co enforces a strict password policy on my phone. Sometimes when I get bored, I intentionally enter the password too many times causing the device to be wiped.

BigJohn11
50%
50%
BigJohn11,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/22/2011 | 1:02:59 AM
re: Most Consumers Don't Lock Mobile Phone Via PIN
David, the time out setting has been a capability for nearly 2 years. So most likely it's your IT team who has not set it to your liking. Options are Simple or complex passwords, require alpha numeric, min password length, min number of complex characters, passcode age, auto lock time 1-5 minutes or no auto lock, password history, grace period for device lock, and max number of failed attempts.
DavidMichael
50%
50%
DavidMichael,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/21/2011 | 3:19:17 PM
re: Most Consumers Don't Lock Mobile Phone Via PIN
I've just switched from a company provided Blackberry to company provided iPhone (both of which had required PIN's). On the Blackberry the PIN requirement only came on after a predefined timeout even on screen lock which is much more convinient than the iPhone which always requires the PIN. I like your suggestion here Duncan. Please take note Apple!
Denver IT Consulting
50%
50%
Denver IT Consulting,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/14/2011 | 10:51:41 PM
re: Most Consumers Don't Lock Mobile Phone Via PIN
This can end up being a nightmare situation for employees and even management staff that do not follow setting up their mobile devices for locking or at least some type of security measure whether it be remote via application or not. Getting authorized access to sensitive documents, emails and other data within the workplace can be easily prevented with measures like this.
Quazzi
50%
50%
Quazzi,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/8/2011 | 3:24:40 AM
re: Most Consumers Don't Lock Mobile Phone Via PIN
Keep in mind that there are applications available that can let you remotely disable and lock, and delete the phone content......assuming this functionality is activated at start-up!
Duncan Murtagh
50%
50%
Duncan Murtagh,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/5/2011 | 1:25:17 AM
re: Most Consumers Don't Lock Mobile Phone Via PIN
On the iPhone a simple solution would be to adjust the way the lock button at the top of the phone works. Right now one click locks the phone and the PIN lock kicks in after whatever number of minutes you've set it to. They could make 2 clicks of that lock bring on the PIN lock.
jrapoza
50%
50%
jrapoza,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/4/2011 | 11:32:27 PM
re: Most Consumers Don't Lock Mobile Phone Via PIN
I do use the PIN on my phone, though it's basically a result of having lost a phone that I didn't lock with a PIN and worrying about what was on the phone (luckily nothing too sensitive).
I can understand the frustration. It can be annoying to have to enter that PIN everytime you need to do something on the phone.
Legitimate Home Jobs
50%
50%
Legitimate Home Jobs,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/4/2011 | 11:31:37 PM
re: Most Consumers Don't Lock Mobile Phone Via PIN
I used to never lock my phone. That is, until a lot of friends kept telling me I was "butt-dialing" them. Now I always lock my phone. :-)


News
US Formally Attributes SolarWinds Attack to Russian Intelligence Agency
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  4/15/2021
News
Dependency Problems Increase for Open Source Components
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  4/14/2021
News
FBI Operation Remotely Removes Web Shells From Exchange Servers
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  4/14/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-25382
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-23
An improper authorization of using debugging command in Secure Folder prior to SMR Oct-2020 Release 1 allows unauthorized access to contents in Secure Folder via debugging command.
CVE-2021-26291
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-23
Apache Maven will follow repositories that are defined in a dependency’s Project Object Model (pom) which may be surprising to some users, resulting in potential risk if a malicious actor takes over that repository or is able to insert themselves into a position to pretend to be t...
CVE-2021-31607
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-23
In SaltStack Salt 2016.9 through 3002.6, a command injection vulnerability exists in the snapper module that allows for local privilege escalation on a minion. The attack requires that a file is created with a pathname that is backed up by snapper, and that the master calls the snapper.diff function...
CVE-2021-31597
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-23
The xmlhttprequest-ssl package before 1.6.1 for Node.js disables SSL certificate validation by default, because rejectUnauthorized (when the property exists but is undefined) is considered to be false within the https.request function of Node.js. In other words, no certificate is ever rejected.
CVE-2021-2296
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-22
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). The supported version that is affected is Prior to 6.1.20. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromi...