Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
NSA PRISM Creates Stir, But Appears Legal
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
gavgavgav
50%
50%
gavgavgav,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/10/2013 | 4:44:01 PM
re: NSA PRISM Creates Stir, But Appears Legal
I agree entirely with the other commenters that legality is completely irrelevant when the laws themselves are overreaching. In the US it should be judged by its constitutionality, while in the rest of the world it should be condemned in the harshest language.

The 4th amendment to the US Constitution states:

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Sometimes the definition of the word "search" is called into question, but there is plenty of precedent for that. The so-called Katz Standard defines a search in this context as occurring when:

1) a person expects privacy in the thing being searched [as I do in my phone, email and other non-public data exchanges]
2) society believes that expectation is reasonable [which is evident by the public outcry].

So how can PRISM and the phone record surveillance programs be constitutional?

Additionally the whole affair drastically weakens the USA's right to condemn other nations regarding privacy, intellectual property theft, human rights and related issues. How does the US now speak to China about the PLA's unit 61398? But then, how does the US combat international computer crime while (reportedly)working with Israel to develop and distribute Stuxnet and related malware into other nations? Can the States decry human rights abuses in Myanmar while failing to close Guantanamo? I know I'm not comparing apples to apples in these examples, but each one weakens America's right to be an international role model and demonstrates a deeply worrying trend away from its very own constitutionality.

Now is the time for the American public and the larger International community to read the documents of the US Founding Fathers (they're not long), understand their intent and get vocal about changing things for the better!
Gavin, CISSP, SSCP, CEH
zerses
50%
50%
zerses,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/10/2013 | 12:57:42 AM
re: NSA PRISM Creates Stir, But Appears Legal
Not according to its authors.
zerses
50%
50%
zerses,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/10/2013 | 12:56:58 AM
re: NSA PRISM Creates Stir, But Appears Legal
I say it is not legal.

The law is specific and this DRAGNET is NOT SPECIFIC.
moarsauce123
50%
50%
moarsauce123,
User Rank: Ninja
6/8/2013 | 4:08:29 PM
re: NSA PRISM Creates Stir, But Appears Legal
Did all this massive surveillance do anything? And how is it necessary to collect records on millions who have done nothing wrong and are not on the path of doing so? This is like burning down an entire house to kill one fly.
moarsauce123
50%
50%
moarsauce123,
User Rank: Ninja
6/8/2013 | 4:06:35 PM
re: NSA PRISM Creates Stir, But Appears Legal
This is exactly what the Patriot Acts were intended to do!
Somedude8
50%
50%
Somedude8,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/8/2013 | 3:36:41 PM
re: NSA PRISM Creates Stir, But Appears Legal
Oh geez, the tinfoil hat crowd is gonna go nuts with this one.
moarsauce123
50%
50%
moarsauce123,
User Rank: Ninja
6/8/2013 | 12:07:09 PM
re: NSA PRISM Creates Stir, But Appears Legal
Legal yes, that is the sad part about it.
DataEquity
50%
50%
DataEquity,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/7/2013 | 8:05:23 PM
re: NSA PRISM Creates Stir, But Appears Legal
and we've already seen how easily these agencies can be hacked
Lorna Garey
50%
50%
Lorna Garey,
User Rank: Ninja
6/7/2013 | 7:08:40 PM
re: NSA PRISM Creates Stir, But Appears Legal
While "goose stepping toward totalitarianism" is a bit histrionic, I never said I think the government is in the right. It's a pretty clear infringement on the 4th amendment, IMO. That said, for the sake of argument, what if the NSA proved that the program did stop four or five other plots like the Boston bombing by using data analysis to connect dots and show the FBI where to look?
muttal
50%
50%
muttal,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/7/2013 | 6:25:59 PM
re: NSA PRISM Creates Stir, But Appears Legal
In addition to Jed's response to Lorna's comment, the fact is that the Tsarnaev brothers were NOT stopped despite this Big Brother snooping. Sometimes, people have a false sense of security, particularly if they think they will not be targets. The fact is, these programs are run by human beings with the same limitations as any other human beings. The false sense of security will be quickly upended when you become the target for some idiotic reason and, by then, it will be too late...
Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Stop Defending Everything
Kevin Kurzawa, Senior Information Security Auditor,  2/12/2020
Small Business Security: 5 Tips on How and Where to Start
Mike Puglia, Chief Strategy Officer at Kaseya,  2/13/2020
Architectural Analysis IDs 78 Specific Risks in Machine-Learning Systems
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  2/13/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
The concept of application security is well known, but application security testing and remediation processes remain unbalanced. Most organizations are confident in their approach to AppSec, although others seem to have no approach at all. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-4230
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-19
IBM DB2 for Linux, UNIX and Windows (includes DB2 Connect Server) 11.1 and 11.5 is vulnerable to an escalation of privilege when an authenticated local attacker with special permissions executes specially crafted Db2 commands. IBM X-Force ID: 175212.
CVE-2019-4429
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-19
IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.6.0 and 7.6.1 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 162886.
CVE-2019-4457
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-19
IBM Jazz Foundation 6.0, 6.0.1, 6.0.2, 6.0.3, 6.0.4, 6.0.5, 6.0.6, and 6.0.6.1 could allow an authenticated user to obtain sensitive information that could be used in further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 163654.
CVE-2019-4640
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-19
IBM Security Secret Server 10.7 processes patches, image backups and other updates without sufficiently verifying the origin and integrity of the code which could result in an attacker executing malicious code. IBM X-Force ID: 170046.
CVE-2020-4135
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-19
IBM DB2 for Linux, UNIX and Windows (includes DB2 Connect Server) 9.7, 10.1, 10.5, 11.1, and 11.5 could allow an unauthenticated user to send specially crafted packets to cause a denial of service from excessive memory usage.