Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
NSA PRISM Creates Stir, But Appears Legal
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
gavgavgav
50%
50%
gavgavgav,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/10/2013 | 4:44:01 PM
re: NSA PRISM Creates Stir, But Appears Legal
I agree entirely with the other commenters that legality is completely irrelevant when the laws themselves are overreaching. In the US it should be judged by its constitutionality, while in the rest of the world it should be condemned in the harshest language.

The 4th amendment to the US Constitution states:

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Sometimes the definition of the word "search" is called into question, but there is plenty of precedent for that. The so-called Katz Standard defines a search in this context as occurring when:

1) a person expects privacy in the thing being searched [as I do in my phone, email and other non-public data exchanges]
2) society believes that expectation is reasonable [which is evident by the public outcry].

So how can PRISM and the phone record surveillance programs be constitutional?

Additionally the whole affair drastically weakens the USA's right to condemn other nations regarding privacy, intellectual property theft, human rights and related issues. How does the US now speak to China about the PLA's unit 61398? But then, how does the US combat international computer crime while (reportedly)working with Israel to develop and distribute Stuxnet and related malware into other nations? Can the States decry human rights abuses in Myanmar while failing to close Guantanamo? I know I'm not comparing apples to apples in these examples, but each one weakens America's right to be an international role model and demonstrates a deeply worrying trend away from its very own constitutionality.

Now is the time for the American public and the larger International community to read the documents of the US Founding Fathers (they're not long), understand their intent and get vocal about changing things for the better!
Gavin, CISSP, SSCP, CEH
zerses
50%
50%
zerses,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/10/2013 | 12:57:42 AM
re: NSA PRISM Creates Stir, But Appears Legal
Not according to its authors.
zerses
50%
50%
zerses,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/10/2013 | 12:56:58 AM
re: NSA PRISM Creates Stir, But Appears Legal
I say it is not legal.

The law is specific and this DRAGNET is NOT SPECIFIC.
moarsauce123
50%
50%
moarsauce123,
User Rank: Ninja
6/8/2013 | 4:08:29 PM
re: NSA PRISM Creates Stir, But Appears Legal
Did all this massive surveillance do anything? And how is it necessary to collect records on millions who have done nothing wrong and are not on the path of doing so? This is like burning down an entire house to kill one fly.
moarsauce123
50%
50%
moarsauce123,
User Rank: Ninja
6/8/2013 | 4:06:35 PM
re: NSA PRISM Creates Stir, But Appears Legal
This is exactly what the Patriot Acts were intended to do!
Somedude8
50%
50%
Somedude8,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/8/2013 | 3:36:41 PM
re: NSA PRISM Creates Stir, But Appears Legal
Oh geez, the tinfoil hat crowd is gonna go nuts with this one.
moarsauce123
50%
50%
moarsauce123,
User Rank: Ninja
6/8/2013 | 12:07:09 PM
re: NSA PRISM Creates Stir, But Appears Legal
Legal yes, that is the sad part about it.
DataEquity
50%
50%
DataEquity,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/7/2013 | 8:05:23 PM
re: NSA PRISM Creates Stir, But Appears Legal
and we've already seen how easily these agencies can be hacked
Lorna Garey
50%
50%
Lorna Garey,
User Rank: Ninja
6/7/2013 | 7:08:40 PM
re: NSA PRISM Creates Stir, But Appears Legal
While "goose stepping toward totalitarianism" is a bit histrionic, I never said I think the government is in the right. It's a pretty clear infringement on the 4th amendment, IMO. That said, for the sake of argument, what if the NSA proved that the program did stop four or five other plots like the Boston bombing by using data analysis to connect dots and show the FBI where to look?
muttal
50%
50%
muttal,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/7/2013 | 6:25:59 PM
re: NSA PRISM Creates Stir, But Appears Legal
In addition to Jed's response to Lorna's comment, the fact is that the Tsarnaev brothers were NOT stopped despite this Big Brother snooping. Sometimes, people have a false sense of security, particularly if they think they will not be targets. The fact is, these programs are run by human beings with the same limitations as any other human beings. The false sense of security will be quickly upended when you become the target for some idiotic reason and, by then, it will be too late...
Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Exploits Released for As-Yet Unpatched Critical Citrix Flaw
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  1/13/2020
Major Brazilian Bank Tests Homomorphic Encryption on Financial Data
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/10/2020
Will This Be the Year of the Branded Cybercriminal?
Raveed Laeb, Product Manager at KELA,  1/13/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
[Just Released] How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
[Just Released] How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-3682
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-17
The docker-kubic package in SUSE CaaS Platform 3.0 before 17.09.1_ce-7.6.1 provided access to an insecure API locally on the Kubernetes master node.
CVE-2019-17361
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-17
In SaltStack Salt through 2019.2.0, the salt-api NEST API with the ssh client enabled is vulnerable to command injection. This allows an unauthenticated attacker with network access to the API endpoint to execute arbitrary code on the salt-api host.
CVE-2019-19142
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-17
Intelbras WRN240 devices do not require authentication to replace the firmware via a POST request to the incoming/Firmware.cfg URI.
CVE-2019-19801
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-17
In Gallagher Command Centre Server versions of v8.10 prior to v8.10.1134(MR4), v8.00 prior to v8.00.1161(MR5), v7.90 prior to v7.90.991(MR5), v7.80 prior to v7.80.960(MR2) and v7.70 or earlier, an unprivileged but authenticated user is able to perform a backup of the Command Centre databases.
CVE-2019-19802
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-17
In Gallagher Command Centre Server v8.10 prior to v8.10.1134(MR4), v8.00 prior to v8.00.1161(MR5), v7.90 prior to v7.90.991(MR5), v7.80 prior to v7.80.960(MR2) and v7.70 or earlier, an authenticated user connecting to OPCUA can view all data that would be replicated in a multi-server setup without p...