Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Anonymous Says DDoS Attacks Like Free Speech
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Laurianne
50%
50%
Laurianne,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/11/2013 | 7:23:21 PM
re: Anonymous Says DDoS Attacks Like Free Speech
My colleague at Dark Reading, Kelly Jackson Higgins, points out that this same issue came up at the most recent DefCon conference. Read more about it: http://www.darkreading.com/dat...

Laurianne McLaughlin
InformationWeek
Nyuk
50%
50%
Nyuk,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/11/2013 | 7:05:27 PM
re: Anonymous Says DDoS Attacks Like Free Speech
After seeing the faces of IT execs hearing that they are being attacked I'd go further to classify them as terrorism.

Release the drones on them! (At risk of having them taken over. ;-)
jries921
50%
50%
jries921,
User Rank: Ninja
1/11/2013 | 6:35:33 PM
re: Anonymous Says DDoS Attacks Like Free Speech
Good point. Unless the owners of all the machines used agreed to participate in the DDoS attack, the attackers are engaging in what amounts to burglary and hijacking (regardless of what the law may happen to say).
jries921
50%
50%
jries921,
User Rank: Ninja
1/11/2013 | 6:32:12 PM
re: Anonymous Says DDoS Attacks Like Free Speech
Right!

...and setting off Molotov cocktails is covered by the right to keep and bear arms!

I agree that corporate political expenditures aren't free speech either (as the late Justice Hugo Black famously said, "Speech is speech"), but dubious Supreme Court precedents are no excuse.

DDoS attacks are harassment, not speech.
ikeman
50%
50%
ikeman,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/11/2013 | 6:25:41 PM
re: Anonymous Says DDoS Attacks Like Free Speech
Doesn't DDoS imply that several compromised systems were required to make this so-called protest? By doing so, they are implicitly including other people in the protest who may not agree with the protest, and they've hacked their computers...sorry, they need to rethink that argument, unless all the computers involved to create the DDoS attack are all their own computers. Plus, protesting should be one person to one protest ratio, not one person can make thousands of the same protest ratio.
irishutopia
50%
50%
irishutopia,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/11/2013 | 6:21:26 PM
re: Anonymous Says DDoS Attacks Like Free Speech
hmm...an interesting spin on the idea, but wouldn't this lead to everyone throwing down random DDoS attacks in the name of protest?
lgaryHB
50%
50%
lgaryHB,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/11/2013 | 6:17:01 PM
re: Anonymous Says DDoS Attacks Like Free Speech
At the risk of being attacked by Anonymous, I would argue that their premise is cute, but flawed. An Occupy protest sits on public property outside of the established business. Were they to enter the business they are protesting, they would be violating laws on the books, not exercising free speech rights. Also, business is still being conducted inside the premises. DDoS attacks are not by definition staying on the public square, but are entering the established online business site. You cannot knock on the door of an online web page without entering. The attacker might also be violating that business or individual's free speech rights by blocking the web page from being presented in the public internet. And if you were to repeatedly knock on a real business's door thousands of times a second, you would be subject to harassment charges if not trespassing. That is not speech nor is it peaceable assembly.
jerrynesmith
50%
50%
jerrynesmith,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/11/2013 | 6:06:59 PM
re: Anonymous Says DDoS Attacks Like Free Speech
I thought this (DDoS as Freedom of Speech) a ridiculous notion. But I thought the same of corporations' having protected freedom of speech as a person and freedom of speech being spending unlimited money on political campaigns and remaining anonymous.
<<   <   Page 2 / 2


News
A Startup With NSA Roots Wants Silently Disarming Cyberattacks on the Wire to Become the Norm
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  5/11/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
Cybersecurity: What Is Truly Essential?
Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  5/12/2021
Commentary
3 Cybersecurity Myths to Bust
Etay Maor, Sr. Director Security Strategy at Cato Networks,  5/11/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-18178
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-18
Path Traversal in HongCMS v4.0.0 allows remote attackers to view, edit, and delete arbitrary files via a crafted POST request to the component &quot;/hcms/admin/index.php/language/ajax.&quot;
CVE-2020-20214
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-18
Mikrotik RouterOs 6.44.6 (long-term tree) suffers from an assertion failure vulnerability in the btest process. An authenticated remote attacker can cause a Denial of Service due to an assertion failure via a crafted packet.
CVE-2020-20222
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-18
Mikrotik RouterOs 6.44.6 (long-term tree) suffers from a memory corruption vulnerability in the /nova/bin/sniffer process. An authenticated remote attacker can cause a Denial of Service (NULL pointer dereference).
CVE-2020-20236
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-18
Mikrotik RouterOs 6.46.3 (stable tree) suffers from a memory corruption vulnerability in the /nova/bin/sniffer process. An authenticated remote attacker can cause a Denial of Service due to improper memory access.
CVE-2020-20237
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-18
Mikrotik RouterOs 6.46.3 (stable tree) suffers from a memory corruption vulnerability in the /nova/bin/sniffer process. An authenticated remote attacker can cause a Denial of Service due to improper memory access.