Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-31476PUBLISHED: 2021-06-16
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 10.1.3.37598. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the han...
CVE-2021-31477PUBLISHED: 2021-06-16
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of GE Reason RPV311 14A03. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the firmware and filesystem of the device. The firmware and filesystem contain hard-...
CVE-2021-32690PUBLISHED: 2021-06-16
Helm is a tool for managing Charts (packages of pre-configured Kubernetes resources). In versions of helm prior to 3.6.1, a vulnerability exists where the username and password credentials associated with a Helm repository could be passed on to another domain referenced by that Helm repository. This...
CVE-2021-32691PUBLISHED: 2021-06-16
Apollos Apps is an open source platform for launching church-related apps. In Apollos Apps versions prior to 2.20.0, new user registrations are able to access anyone's account by only knowing their basic profile information (name, birthday, gender, etc). This includes all app functionality within th...
CVE-2021-32243PUBLISHED: 2021-06-16FOGProject v1.5.9 is affected by a File Upload RCE (Authenticated).
Latest Comment: Zero Trust doesn't have to break your budget!
The State of Cybersecurity Incident ResponseIn this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Tweet This
0 Comments
User Rank: Ninja
4/15/2021 | 5:48:17 PM
In addition, all ports (if web-server) should be blocked, except port 443 or 80 in some respects (Windows firewall can do that but there are ofcourse better options - PaloAlto is a good one that we use), not sure why the execution policy (if configured properly) would even allow remove exploits like this to penetrate the initial defenses).
netsh advfirewall firewall add rule name="Require Encryption for Inbound TCP/80" protocol=TCP dir=in localport=80 security=authdynenc action=allow
I would also go to "taskschd.msc" and look at the "Task Scheduler Library" to ensure there are no running "PS" scripts. The user can create a script to run to ensure the setting is always set to "Restricted"
This ensures the system is set to restrict executionpolicy or set it to Restricted.
Also, Windows 10 uses Windows Defender Security Center to protect against these types of Attacks, this could have been overlookewell, lessons learned.
Todd