Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
How to Identify Cobalt Strike on Your Network
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
jamesdeluk
50%
50%
jamesdeluk,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/18/2020 | 6:26:16 PM
Images
Isn't this post missing some images?
SamlServicesUser
50%
50%
SamlServicesUser,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/19/2020 | 6:04:46 PM
Great first steps but missing major vector
While I find this article well written, and certainly helpful to a blue team trying to understand Cobalt Strike beacons better, it neglects to mention the beacon's most useful evasion listener technique; DNS. While the article focuses on TCP and HTTP traffic, which is certainly loud on the network, beacons using DNS over UDP are far more useful to attackers. Take for example a payload ran on a domain-joined Windows server with all inbound an outbound network traffic blocked, outside of the required communication with its domain controller. In this scenario, direct TCP and HTTP shells, reverse and bind, are impossible to access, even if the attacker is on the same network. However, if that payload is a Cobalt Strike's DNS beacon, that isolated domain-joined device will find its communication with its domain controller weaponized as DNS lookups are sent to the attacker, remote on the internet, to establish the C2 channel for command execution and data exhilaration. How that works is beyond the scope of this comment, but I assure you, as someone who uses these a lot, they are highly efficient in evasion and never fail to shock the most capable of blue teams.


Commentary
Ransomware Is Not the Problem
Adam Shostack, Consultant, Entrepreneur, Technologist, Game Designer,  6/9/2021
Edge-DRsplash-11-edge-ask-the-experts
How Can I Test the Security of My Home-Office Employees' Routers?
John Bock, Senior Research Scientist,  6/7/2021
News
New Ransomware Group Claiming Connection to REvil Gang Surfaces
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  6/10/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-24376
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-21
The Autoptimize WordPress plugin before 2.7.8 attempts to delete malicious files (such as .php) form the uploaded archive via the "Import Settings" feature, after its extraction. However, the extracted folders are not checked and it is possible to upload a zip which contained a directory w...
CVE-2021-24377
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-21
The Autoptimize WordPress plugin before 2.7.8 attempts to remove potential malicious files from the extracted archive uploaded via the 'Import Settings' feature, however this is not sufficient to protect against RCE as a race condition can be achieved in between the moment the file is extracted on t...
CVE-2021-24378
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-21
The Autoptimize WordPress plugin before 2.7.8 does not check for malicious files such as .html in the archive uploaded via the 'Import Settings' feature. As a result, it is possible for a high privilege user to upload a malicious file containing JavaScript code inside an archive which will execute w...
CVE-2021-24379
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-21
The Comments Like Dislike WordPress plugin before 1.1.4 allows users to like/dislike posted comments, however does not prevent them from replaying the AJAX request to add a like. This allows any user (even unauthenticated) to add unlimited like/dislike to any comment. The plugin appears to have some...
CVE-2021-24383
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-21
The WP Google Maps WordPress plugin before 8.1.12 did not sanitise, validate of escape the Map Name when output in the Map List of the admin dashboard, leading to an authenticated Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue