Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-1813PUBLISHED: 2022-05-22OS Command Injection in GitHub repository yogeshojha/rengine prior to 1.2.0.
CVE-2022-1809PUBLISHED: 2022-05-21Access of Uninitialized Pointer in GitHub repository radareorg/radare2 prior to 5.7.0.
CVE-2022-31267PUBLISHED: 2022-05-21Gitblit 1.9.2 allows privilege escalation via the Config User Service: a control character can be placed in a profile data field, such as an emailAddress%3Atext '[email protected]\n\trole = "#admin"' value.
CVE-2022-31268PUBLISHED: 2022-05-21A Path Traversal vulnerability in Gitblit 1.9.3 can lead to reading website files via /resources//../ (e.g., followed by a WEB-INF or META-INF pathname).
CVE-2022-31264PUBLISHED: 2022-05-21Solana solana_rbpf before 0.2.29 has an addition integer overflow via invalid ELF program headers. elf.rs has a panic via a malformed eBPF program.
User Rank: Ninja
6/11/2020 | 12:17:08 PM
From my understanding, most of the printers are behind firewalls; however, if there is lateral/horizontal movement, the end-user or admin has bigger problems that need to be addressed (per the statement made by the speaker). In certain instances, I can see where certain cameras might be affected because they are connected directly to the internet (traffic cameras) and some of their IP Addresses are made public, but I am not sure how many IOT devices are connected directly to the internet. There is a site on the web that indicates a number of devices connected directly to the internet but that is part of another conversation - https://www.shodan.io/explore
I do see limitations in the statements made but it is possible, we just need to remain vigilant. A possible remidy would be to connect using SHA Hash 256 to the OS because the system could determine if the hash was found on the network or a token process where a PIN is used (a number of printers have this capability but most people don't use it).
Todd