Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
How Much Security Is Enough? Practitioners Weigh In
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
tdsan
tdsan,
User Rank: Ninja
10/24/2019 | 12:17:08 PM
Accountability and retaining takent should be paramount

"Security talent, especially senior talent, is very hard to find," Nather says. "Unfortunately, a lot of organizations are in the position of competing with security vendors for that talent."
  • I think he meant to say that "...organizations are [not] in the position of competing with the security vendors..." I don't necessarily agree with that especially with the overseas talent coming to America and the existing talent matriculating from all of the various major institutions, schools need to offer more classes from a security standpoint and teachers need to put students in virtual security scenarios where the environment is a virtual synthetic setup (they experience a major hack).

 

Even outsourcing has its limitations, Nather points out. "There won't be anything you can completely outsource because your outsourcer will come back to you and say, 'we don't know what this means,' and 'we need to talk to someone internally who can take care of this.'"
  •  I do agree with that, we won't be able to address every scenario and outcome, however, we can address 90% of them by ensuring the training and talent we have in office are all working togetehr and on the same page (communication), remove the office politics (this needs to come from the top-down) and we as individuals within organization need to take it upon themselves to learn and train while away from the office, that needs to be something that is engrained in the person you hire (continuous learning).

 

"If we as professionals can't agree on what organizations need, how are they supposed to know?" Nather asks. When you don't know the risks you're trying to manage, it's tough to come up with a specific shopping list. Businesses may need to conduct extensive research and perform a security audit to determine exactly what they need and can afford.
  •  I agree with this statement, but executives try to make decision based on what they know or don't know and the friends they have in the market (kickbacks), that needs to be removed. There needs to be a test environment where decisions are made based on the performance of the solution and create a viable application research strategy, identify price and market acceptance (a forum where ideas can be exchanged). Cisco is not the only player, employees need to be open to trying different technologies, train and constant test those solutions (R&D team). Remove the age of adage that individuals are trying to save their job by using something they know, remove that mentality.

 

"It's not that they're incapable, but they have constraints in that environment they might not be able to get around," she says. An airplane manufacturer has influence, Nather continues, but new technology will have to be carefully tested, in one airplane at a time, before it's rolled out. In the public sector, it's difficult to justify upgrading equipment when everything works fine. Public sector technology is designed to maximize taxpayer's dollars, not keep up with security.
  •  Yes, Scada environments have the same thing, but as mentioned earlier, if a test environment was set up, replicate (small version) and determine if the security solution affects how the application performs (place network monitoring tools around and in the application), the user can then determine if the tests affect how the application allowing team members to make any adjustments to alleviate the problems found (consistent and continual testing, ensure the environment is like the one in production, work with the vendors to help resolve the issue).

 

The percentage of those depending on external resources could be admitting there is a limit to how much an organization can know about security, she explains. After all, a business with the expertise to know what it needs to do for security may not have the talent to execute on it. Many companies outsource responsibilities that are hard to hire for, and hard to sustain with skilled workers: security operations monitoring is one example; incident response is another.
  • Look at the big picture, the security team should be an investment (protecting resources), the market for those resources increase, then there should be resources allocated to keep that talent on-site, the NBA, NFL, Hockey and others do it, the security teams are no different.

 

Todd


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Incorporating a Prevention Mindset into Threat Detection and Response
Threat detection and response systems, by definition, are reactive because they have to wait for damage to be done before finding the attack. With a prevention-mindset, security teams can proactively anticipate the attacker's next move, rather than reacting to specific threats or trying to detect the latest techniques in real-time. The report covers areas enterprises should focus on: What positive response looks like. Improving security hygiene. Combining preventive actions with red team efforts.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-31650
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-25
In SoX 14.4.2, there is a floating-point exception in lsx_aiffstartwrite in aiff.c in libsox.a.
CVE-2022-31651
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-25
In SoX 14.4.2, there is an assertion failure in rate_init in rate.c in libsox.a.
CVE-2022-29256
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-25
sharp is an application for Node.js image processing. Prior to version 0.30.5, there is a possible vulnerability in logic that is run only at `npm install` time when installing versions of `sharp` prior to the latest v0.30.5. If an attacker has the ability to set the value of the `PKG_CONFIG_PATH` e...
CVE-2022-26067
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-25
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the OAS Engine SecureTransferFiles functionality of Open Automation Software OAS Platform V16.00.0112. A specially-crafted series of network requests can lead to arbitrary file read. An attacker can send a sequence of requests to trigger this vulnera...
CVE-2022-26077
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-25
A cleartext transmission of sensitive information vulnerability exists in the OAS Engine configuration communications functionality of Open Automation Software OAS Platform V16.00.0112. A targeted network sniffing attack can lead to a disclosure of sensitive information. An attacker can sniff networ...