Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Chinese Group Built Advanced Trojan by Reverse Engineering NSA Attack Tool
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
DHorse2
100%
0%
DHorse2,
User Rank: Strategist
9/7/2019 | 3:55:17 PM
Rationale
I fact check.Occam's razor applies. Regardless of the code source, those mods and design would occur. A hand wave occurs here by Symantec as their theory is irrational from an IT view. Nornal phased development ans enhancements plus code theft you can date. Got it. Where would evidence of all this story emerge from. It's a narrative and not credible for it.
tdsan
50%
50%
tdsan,
User Rank: Ninja
9/12/2019 | 1:14:46 PM
Re: Rationale
Wow, someone who finally gets it. Symantec is in bed with the NSA and other vendors in the US so it would behoove them to protect their sources.

Symantec said it was unclear how APT3 had obtained the NSA tools. But it ruled out the possibility that the Chinese threat actor had obtained the weapons from the large trove of NSA cyber weapons that hacking outfit Shadow Brokers publicly leaked in 2017.

 Also, shadow brokers appeared in the Summer of 2016, but that is when they were first identified to the public, they don't know when they actually started and when their attacks began. So this notion of code that is very similar but before the ShadowBrokers extracted information from the NSA is preposterous. Also, the black market is where individuals post code (even on Github) so it can be purchased at a later time. The last time I looked, the Chinese had deep pockets. This is more of a marketing campaign to say the least.

Also, there is another group in the NSA called Tailored Access Operations (TAO), there were numerous weapons created at the Ft. Meade, MD facility, so now we know where the Ransomware came from, us.

Ransomware Affected Systems

 

American officials had to explain to close allies — and to business leaders in the United States — how cyberweapons developed at Fort Meade in Maryland came to be used against them. Experts believe more attacks using the stolen N.S.A. tools are all but certain. - "The New York Times"


 

This does not surprise me, since the Iranian Subterfuge Attack (Stuxnet) to the Ransomeware attacks across the globe, it was only a matter of time until the weapons we created were going to be used against us (Shadow Broker Hack). 

From the words of "Bill Dukes" in the movie "Menace II Society", "You know you done f--ked up Right".

T
ifaux
50%
50%
ifaux,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/13/2019 | 2:21:21 PM
Re: Rationale
"Also, the black market is where individuals post code (even on Github)" GitHub; This is true. A surprising amount of resources intended for questionable use. Blatant in some cases, or thinly veiled as "security tools".


COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 5/28/2020
Stay-at-Home Orders Coincide With Massive DNS Surge
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/27/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Can you smell me now?
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-11844
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
There is an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Micro Focus Service Management Automation (SMA) product affecting version 2018.05 to 2020.02. The vulnerability could be exploited to provide unauthorized access to the Container Deployment Foundation.
CVE-2020-6937
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
A Denial of Service vulnerability in MuleSoft Mule CE/EE 3.8.x, 3.9.x, and 4.x released before April 7, 2020, could allow remote attackers to submit data which can lead to resource exhaustion.
CVE-2020-7648
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker before 4.72.2 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads for users who have access to Snyk's internal network by appending the URL with a fragment identifier and a whitelisted path e.g. `#package.json`
CVE-2020-7650
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker after 4.72.0 including and before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads to users with access to Snyk's internal network of any files ending in the following extensions: yaml, yml or json.
CVE-2020-7654
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Information Exposure. It logs private keys if logging level is set to DEBUG.