Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
The Flaw in Vulnerability Management: It's Time to Get Real
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
JimS980
50%
50%
JimS980,
User Rank: Author
8/16/2019 | 1:20:40 PM
Re: The real problems facing vulnerability management are...
Automation always has it's limits and challenges. Working across and breaking down the organizational silo's  is certainly a big part of the challenge. But failure to develop the conditional logic and overcome the langage barriers between organizations is not a good enough excuse for not moving forward. Certainly the degree of auto remediation is limited to those vulnerabilities that you can ascertain with certaintity and resolve effectively. We recently implemented at a large retailer and we were able to resolve almost 80% of the predefined health checks and vulnerabilities automatically. The remainder required some human intervention. This translated to a significant SLA improvement and huge savings in time and money. Will they ever get to 100% is unlikely or maintain 80% is hard to say, but they have already benefited and arguably will continue to do so to varying and justifiable degree's going forward. 
seven_stones
50%
50%
seven_stones,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/16/2019 | 11:14:47 AM
The real problems facing vulnerability management are...
This article centres mostly around faster remediation and advocates automating this (patch deployment), and cites this as the main problem facing TVM capabilities. Automatic remediation is an extraordinarily bad idea, almost as bad as mayo on chips (french fries). This is basic IT operations 101. It's. A. Terrible. Idea.

No - the 2 main problems:
  • Staff in infosec are unable to speak the same language as IT teams who will address the problem and sign-off on the change request. Mostly they lack an attack mindset. They're not in a position to empathise and effectively justify the change.
  • lets say the aforementioned problem is not a problem, even then the tools used for automation of vulnerability assessment are BAD. I mean really bad. The market is so poorly served by vendors who managed somehow to get their name in the Gartner Magic Quadrant.


COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 4/7/2020
The Coronavirus & Cybersecurity: 3 Areas of Exploitation
Robert R. Ackerman Jr., Founder & Managing Director, Allegis Capital,  4/7/2020
'Unkillable' Android Malware App Continues to Infect Devices Worldwide
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  4/8/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Digitized COVID-19 Prevention
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
Data breaches and regulations have forced organizations to pay closer attention to the security incident response function. However, security leaders may be overestimating their ability to detect and respond to security incidents. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-9499
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-09
Some Dahua products have buffer overflow vulnerabilities. After the successful login of the legal account, the attacker sends a specific DDNS test command, which may cause the device to go down.
CVE-2020-9500
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-09
Some products of Dahua have Denial of Service vulnerabilities. After the successful login of the legal account, the attacker sends a specific log query command, which may cause the device to go down.
CVE-2020-10603
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-09
WebAccess/NMS (versions prior to 3.0.2) does not properly sanitize user input and may allow an attacker to inject system commands remotely.
CVE-2020-10617
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-09
There are multiple ways an unauthenticated attacker could perform SQL injection on WebAccess/NMS (versions prior to 3.0.2) to gain access to sensitive information.
CVE-2020-10619
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-09
An attacker could use a specially crafted URL to delete files outside the WebAccess/NMS's (versions prior to 3.0.2) control.